FENOMENA COPY-PASTE DESAIN FESYEN DI INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA (STUDI PERBANDINGAN HUKUM KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL NEGARA AMERIKA SERIKAT, KOREA SELATAN DAN PERANCIS)

Kasvi Arsalova

Abstract

Abstract

This legal research identifies legal problems related to the phenomenon of copy-paste design of fashion that happens in the fashion industry through Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning the Copyright and do a comparison of the legal protection of fashion design in the United States, South Korea, and France. This legal research uses descriptive normative research methods. The result of this legal research is the protection of Copyright that the creators have is already set in the current regulations and a comparison of the legal protection of fashion design can be said to be balanced with a state of the United States and South Korea but are still lagging behind the French.

Keywords: Copyright Protection; Fashion Design; Comparative Law

 

Abstrak

Penulisan hukum ini mengidentifikasi problematika hukum terkait fenomena copy-paste desain fesyen yang terjadi di industri mode melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 28 tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan melakukan perbandingan perlindungan hukum desain fesyen di negara Amerika Serikat, Korea Selatan, dan Perancis. Penulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif bersifat deskriptif. Hasil dari penulisan hukum ini adalah perlindungan Hak Cipta terhadap pencipta sudah diatur dalam peraturan yang berlaku saat ini dan perbandingan perlindungan hukum atas desain fesyen dapat dikatakan seimbang dengan negara Amerikat Serikat dan Korea Selatan namun masih tertinggal dari negara Perancis.

Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hak Cipta; Desain Fesyen; Perbandingan Hukum

Keywords

Copyright Protection; Fashion Design; Comparative Law

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku :
Abintoro Prakoso. 2016. Hukum Perlindungan Anak. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo.

Harris Munandar & Sally Sitanggang. 2008. Mengenal HAKI (Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Hak Cipta, Paten, Merek dan Seluk- beluknya). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Hendra Tanu Atmadja. 2003. Hak Cipta Musik atau Lagu. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Muchsin. 2003. Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum bagi Investor di Indonesia.Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2014. Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Phillipus. M. Hadjon. 1987. Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu.

Jurnal :
H.S Adler. 2009. “Pirating the runway: The potential impact of the design piracy prohibition act on fashion retail”. Hastings Business Law Journal, 5(2). San Francisco: The University of California

K. Raustial & C. Sprigman. 2006. “The Piracy Paradox: Innovation and IntellecualProperty in Fashion Design”. Virginia Law Review, 92(8). Virginia:University of Virginia.

M. Williams. 2007. “Fashioning a new idea: How the Design Piracy Prohibition Act isa reasonable solution to the fashion design problem”. Tulane Journal ofTechnology and Intellectual Property, 10. New Orleans: Tulane University.

S. Beltrametti. 2010. “Evaluation of the Design Piracy Prohibition Act: Is the cure worse than the Disease? An analogy with counterfeiting and a comparison with the protection available in the European community”. NorthwesternJournal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 8(2). Evanston:Northwestern University.

S. Monseau. 2011. “European design rights: A model for the protection of all designers from piracy”. American Business Law Journal, 48(1). The American Business Law Association.

S.Y. Cha. 2010. “A dispute aspect and a legal issue over the fashion design protection”. Journal of Industrial Property Law, 32, Korea Intellectual Property Society.

S.Y. Yook. 2010. “Legal Protection of Fashion Design”. The Journal of Intellectual Property, 5(2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Teri Agins, 1994. “Copy Shops: Fashion knockoffs hit stores before originals”. The Wall Street Journal, at A1. New York City: The Wall Street Journal.

Y.J Kim. 2004. “Analysis of actual condition of counterfeits and anti-counterfeiting strategies of Korean fashion firms”. Journal of Korean Home Economics,42(1). The Korean Home Economics Association.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan:
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 tahun 2000 tentang Desain Industri
Undang-Undang Nomor 28 tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta
French Intellectual Property Code (IPC)
Internet:
https://m.detik.com/wolipop/fashion-news/d-2748756/hak-cipta-sulit-didaftarkan-iniyang-bisa-dilakukan-desainer-cegah-plagiat

diakses pada tanggal 21
November 2019 pukul 15.19 WIB.
http://fashionlawwiki.pbworks.com/w/page/11611162/Copyright%20Protection%20of%20
Design%20in%20the%20US%20v%20Europe#footnote-20 diakses pada tanggal 17
Desember 2020 pukul 12.10 WIB.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.