Who is Involved: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Al Jazeera and CNN Headlines on Yahya Sinwar's Death (Van Leeuwen's Theory)

Zahra Intan Paradita, Maulaya Arinil Haq, Muhammad Fikri Assyamil, Muhammad Zainal Muttaqien

Abstract

The media significantly shapes public opinion and influences societal perceptions of diverse local and worldwide issues. Consequently, news coverage has the potential to shape public discourse significantly. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach to analyze patterns in the reporting of Yahya Sinwar's death by CNN and Al Jazeera, utilizing Theo Van Leeuwen's (2008) framework for critical discourse analysis.Through the application of Van Leeuwen's theory, the study examines how Western and Middle Eastern media providers frame Sinwar's death and represent the social actors involved in his assassination. Van Leeuwen's framework categorizes the representation of social actors into two primary strategies: exclusion, encompassing suppression and backgrounding, and inclusion, which includes Activation/Passivation, Genericization/Specification, Assimilation, Association, Indetermination, Functionalization/Identification, and Personalization/Impersonalization. The analysis highlights distinct differences in the framing strategies of the two media providers. CNN and Jazeera differ in their framing strategies, with CNN emphasizing individual actions and a direct narrative style, while Jazeera uses a context-driven approach, emphasizing collective experiences and connecting individual events to larger systemic issues

Keywords

Critical Discourse Analysis, Yahya Sinwar, Headline News, Social Actors

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdulkareem, M. A., & Qassim, A. (2017). The representation of ISIS in the American newspapers in terms of Van Leeuwen’s social actor approach: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Basra University for Human Sciences, 80, 1–37.

Amalia, H., Juita, N., & Manaf, N. (2019, July). Exclusions and inclusions on Liputan6.com demo news: Critical discourse analysis based on Theo van Leeuwen’s theory. In ICLLE 2019: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Literature and Education, 22–23 August, Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia (p. 304). European Alliance for Innovation. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-7-2019.2289507

Amoussou, F., & Allagbe, A. A. (2018). Principles, theories and approaches to critical discourse analysis. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 6(1), 11–18.

Fisher, H. O. (2023). Media objectivity and bias in Western coverage of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict (Master’s thesis, Södertörn University, School of Culture and Education).

Hall, S., & Liebenberg, L. (2024). Qualitative description as an introductory method to qualitative research for master’s-level students and research trainees. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241242264. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241242264

Henarni, N. H., & Surwandono, S. (2024). Framing Hamas: A comparative discourse analysis of Western and Middle Eastern media. Al-Balagh: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 9(1), 31–54.

Idul, R. (2020, June). Exclusion of social actors in Hassan Rouhani’s international speech (Theo van Leeuwen’s critical discourse analysis). In ISLLCE 2019: Proceedings of the First International Seminar on Language, Literature, Culture and Education, 15–16 November 2019, Kendari, Indonesia (p. 141). European Alliance for Innovation.

Kamaludin, I., & Hamdani, A. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of Theo Van Leeuwen in criminal news on tvOneNews.com. Matapena: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 6(1), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.36815/matapena.v6i01.2637

Kellner, D. (2003). Media culture: Cultural studies, identity and politics between the modern and the postmodern. London, England: Routledge.

Laily, A. I., Mulawarman, W., & Putri, N. Q. H. (2020). Analisis wacana kritis teks berita kampus pada media online Sketsaunmul.co: model Theo van Leeuwen. Adjektiva: Educational Languages and Literature Studies, 3(1), 23–27.

Patalia, S., Anriani, R., & Abdurrakhman, D. (2020). Theo Van Leeuwen’s inclusion theory in economic news theme of trading compasses in November 2018. JLER (Journal of Language Education Research), 3(1), 47–54.

Putri, R. C. S., & Mardiah, Z. (2024). Corpus-assisted CDA of George Floyd’s murder reports on CNN and Al Jazeera. Jurnal Arbitrer, 11(1), 96–108.

Qasim, A., & Abdulsahib, M. (2014). The representation of ISIS in American newspapers in terms of Van Leeuwen’s social actor approach: A critical discourse analysis. Basrah, Iraq.

Rahimian, J., & Jahanbani, Z. (2023). Critical discourse analysis in the narratives of women under domestic violence based on Van Leeuwen’s social actors (2008). Zabanpazhuhi (Journal of Language Research), 15(46), 85–110.

Rasyid, Y., & Anwar, M. (2021). Application of Theo van Leeuwen's critical discourse analysis in Liputan6.com news on the dissolution of BSNP. IJLECR (International Journal of Language Education and Cultural Review), 7(2), 162–169.

Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

Suharni, S., Saidi, S. B., & Medina, S. (2022). Theo Van Leeuwen’s theory of inclusion in criminal news on Facebook: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(2), 48–57.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Wulandari, P. A., & Liliani, E. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of Theo Van Leeuwen inclusion video podcast on the Gritte Agatha YouTube channel. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 2(2), 341–348.

Zurriyati, F., Rahman, F., & Alaqad, M. H. (2023). Language and power: How news media construct a biased structure of information in public discourse during the presidential election. Malikussaleh Social & Political Reviews, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29103

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/prasasti.v10i2.97000

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.