61.png)
Teknik Instruksional Pertanyaan Guru Di Tahap Evaluating Data, Driving A Conclusion, Presenting The Project In Class As Preffered & Discussion Project Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Skor Valid Relationship Concept Map
Sari
This research aimed to calculate the valid relationship score of concept map (CM) using instructional technique of teacher’s questions in the stages of evaluating data, driving a conclusion, presenting the project in class as preferred & discussion project-based learning. This research was a classroom action research. This research was a classroom action research with the research subject of 36 students in X MIPA of Senior High School. The research procedure was including: planning, lesson plan completed with assessment, acting, observing and reflecting. Validity test in this research was using triangulation method that consisted of verification of valid relationship CM score, documentation based on expert CM and interview to present the valuable relation between concepts. Reduction done to choose the data completion, data interpretation and conclusion based on the complete valid relationship data. Data analysis was using descriptive qualitative. The result of this research shows that valid relationship score of expert CM in pre-research, cycle I and cycle II were written as follows. 1.95%-14.98% with 13.89% of the under averaged students’ score and 11.11% of the over averaged students’ score. 3.08%-61.54% with 19.44% of the under averaged students’ score and 11.11% of the over averaged students’ score. 16.58%-32.16% with 11.11% of the under averaged students’ score and 16.67% of over averaged students’ score. Thus, the use of instructional technique of questioning in the stages of evaluating data, driving a conclusion, presenting the project in class as preferred & discussion project-based learning improving the valid relationship CM score on the individual and classical.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Al-Zahrani, M. Y., & Al-Bargi, A. (2017). The Impact Of Teacher Questioning On Creating Interaction In Efl: A Discourse Analysis. English Language Teaching, 10(6), 135. Https://Doi.Org/10.5539/Elt.V10n6p135
Baumgartner, E., & Zabin, C. J. (2008). A Case Study Of Project-Based Instruction In The Ninth Grade: A Semester- Long Study Of Intertidal BiodiVersity. EnVironmental Education Research, 14(2), 97-114. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/13504620801951640
Broggy, J., & McClelland, G. (2008). An InVestigation to Determine the Impact of Concept Mapping on Learning in an Undergraduate Physics Course. HE Academy Communication, 1(4), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.11120/ndir.2008.00040034
Cañas, A. J., & NoVak, J. D. (2006). Re-examining the foundations for effectiVe use of concept maps. Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology; Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping, I, 494–502.
Cañas, A. J., & NoVak, J. D. (2008). Facilitating the Adoption of Concept Mapping Using CmapTools to Enhance Meaningful Learning. Knowledge Cartography, Software Tools and Mapping Techniques, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-149-7_2
Cañas, A. J., NoVak, J. D., & Reiska, P. (2012). Freedom Vs. Restriction of Content and Structure during Concept Mapping - Possibilities and Limitations for Construction and Assessment. Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proc. of the Fifth Int. Conference on Concept Mapping, 2(1), 247–257. RetrieVed from http://eprint.ihmc.us/245/
Cronin, P. J., Dekhers, J., & Dunn, J. G. (1982). A procedure for using and eValuating concept maps. Research in Science Education, 12(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357009
Dack, H., HoVer, S. Van, & Hicks, D. (2015). The Journal of Social Studies Research “ Try Not to Giggle if You Can Help It ” : The implementation of experiential instructional techniques in social studies classrooms $. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.04.002
Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible enVironment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026125427344
Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design? Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386531-1.00002-8
Illeris, K. (2009). Contemporary theories of learning. … Exhibitions for Lifelong Learning. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039426
Jim Vanides, Yue Yin, Miki Tomita, and M. A. R.-P. (2005). Science Classroom. Science Scope, 28(8), 27–31.
Kean, A. C., & Kwe, N. M. (2014). Meaningful Learning in the Teaching of Culture: The Project Based Learning Approach. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.V2i2.270
Bachri, B. S., Pendidikan, T., & Pendidikan, F. I. (1986). MEYAKINKAN VALIDITAS DATA MELALUI TRIANGULASI PADA PENELITIAN KUALITATIF.
Baumgartner, E., & Zabin, C. J. (2008). A case study of project‐based instruction in the ninth grade: a semester‐long study of intertidal biodiVersity. EnVironmental Education Research, 14(2), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620801951640
Bimbingan, B., & Konseling, D. A. N. (2016). METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF DALAM, 2(2).
Cronin, P. J., Dekhers, J., & Dunn, J. G. (1982). A procedure for using and eValuating concept maps. Research in Science Education, 12(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357009
Dack, H., HoVer, S. Van, & Hicks, D. (2015). The Journal of Social Studies Research “ Try Not to Giggle if You Can Help It ” : The implementation of experiential instructional techniques in social studies classrooms $. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.04.002
Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design? Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386531-1.00002-8
Jim Vanides, Yue Yin, Miki Tomita, and M. A. R.-P. (2005). Science Classroom. Science Scope, 28(8), 27–31.
NoVak, J. D., & Cañas, a J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. IHMC CmapTools, 1–36. https://doi.org/Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 ReV 2008-01
Strautmane, M. (2012). Concept Map-Based Knowledge Assessment Tasks and their Scoring Criteria: an OVerView. Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proc. of the Fifth Int. Conference on Concept Mapping, 1, 80–88. RetrieVed from http://eprint.ihmc.us/219/
Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Students’ use of web-based concept map testing and strategies for learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2729.2001.00160.x
Turgut, H. (2008). PROSPECTIVE SCIENCE TEACHERS ’ CONCEPTUALIZATIONS ABOUT PROJECT BASED, 1(1).
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
