61.png)
Penerapan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas Cooperative Learning Tipe Peer Teaching untuk Meningkatkan Keterlibatan Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi
Sari
The research aims to increase students' engagement in Biology learning by applying cooperative learning method specifically peer teaching. The subjects consisted of 32 high school students focusing on Low Achievement (LA) and High Achievement (HA) students. This research is classroom action research (CAR) with 3 Cycles. The research procedure includes the stage of reflection, planning, implementation of action and observation. Behavioral Engagement (BE) data obtained through observation, other data in the form of Psychological Engagement (PE) and Cognitive Engagement (CE) obtained through student engagement questionnaire based on Student Engagement Instrument (SEI). Technique of data validation used is triangulation technique. Technique of analysis data performed by data reduction, data presentation and drawing conclusions based on qualitative descriptive analysis. The results showed that cooperative learning method specifically peer teaching can increase student engagement in biology learning. The average percentage of all BE aspects observed in LA students before the treatment given, Cycle I, Cycle II and Cycle III respectively was 13.72%; 35.24%; 48.26% and 64.24% respectively. Meanwhile BE results of HA students before the treatment given, Cycle I, Cycle II and Cycle III respectively were 22.22%; 48.97%; 56.6% and 64.76% respectively. The results of PE of LA students before the treatment given to Cycle III increased by 3.54% while PE in HA students before the treatment given to Cycle III increased from 3.75%. The result of CE analysis of LA students has increased before the treatment given toward Cycle III that is 2.94% while in HA students increased by 2.95%.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education.
Balgopal, M. M., & Wallace, A. M. (2009). Decisions and Dilemmas: Using Writing to Learn Activities to Increase Ecological Literacy. Journal of Environmental Education, (June 2016). https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.3.13-26
Dharmayana, W. (2012). Keterlibatan Siswa ( Student Engagement ) sebagai Mediator Kompetensi Emosi dan Prestasi Akademik. Jurnal Psikologi, 39(1), 76–94.
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale ( OSE ), 19(4).
Edwards, S. (2015). Active Learning in the Middle Grades. Middle School Journa, (May), 26–32.
Furrer, C. J., Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2014). The Influence of Teacher and Peer Relationships on Students Classroo Engagement and Everyday Motivational Resilience, 113(1), 101–123.
Gregory, A., Allen, J., & Mikami, A. (2014). Effects of A Professional Development Program on Behavioral Engagement of Student in Middle and High School. Psychology in the Schools, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/pits
Grier-reed, T., Appleton, J., Rodriguez, M., Ganuza, Z., & Reschly, A. L. (2012). Exploring the Student Engagement Instrument and Career Perceptions with College Students, 2(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v2n2p85
Hafiz, A., & Wisdiarman. (2014). Pengaruh Metode Peer Tutoring (Tutor Sebaya) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa dalam Mata Kuliah Menggambar Bentuk Pada Jurusan Seni Rupa FBS UNP Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Seni, XV, 80–91.
Herrmann, K. J. (2013). The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention, 14(3), 175– 187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413498035
Huda, M. (2013). Cooperative Learning.
Latipah, E. (2010). Strategi Self Regulated Learning dan Prestasi Belajar : Jurnal Psikologi, 37(1).
Mandernach, B. J. (2015). Assessment of Student Engagement in Higher Education : A Synthesis of Literature and Assessment Tools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 12(2), 1–14.
Maria, U. (2012). Optimalisasi Hasil Belajar IPA Tentang Sistem Gerak pada Manusia Melalui Metode Diskusi dengan Tehnik Pembelajaran Tutor Sebaya. Dinamika, 3(1).
Overby, K. (2011). Student-Centered Learning. College of DuPage, 9.
Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, (July).
Pusporini, N. (2011). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Tutor Sebaya pada Mata Pelajaran Sosiologi. Jurnal Komunitas, 3(1), 103–120.
San, S., Putu, R., & Manik, W. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual Berbantuan Tutor Sebaya Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(3).
Schmidt, K. (2002). Classroom Action Research: A Case Study Assessing Students Perceptions and Learning Outcomes of Classroom Teaching Versus On-line Teaching. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 40(1).
Smit, K., Brabander, C. J. De, & Martens, R. L. (2014). Student-centred and teacher-centred learning environment in pre-vocational secondary education : Psychological needs , and motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(6), 695–712.
Usman, R. (2017). Penggunaan Tutor Sebaya dan Aktivitas Siswa untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pokok Bahasan Analisis Isi Pidato Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 2 Tapung. FKIP Unversitas Terbuka UPBJJ-UT Pekanbaru, 5, 16–27.
Velez, J. J. (2011). Cultivating Change Through Peer Teaching. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2011.01040
Warsono, & Hariyanto. (2014). Pembelajaran Aktif.
Williams, B., & Fowler, J. (2014). Can Near-Peer Teaching Improve Academic Performance? International Journal of Higher Education, 3(4), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n4p142
Zhao, C., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement. Human Sciences Press, 45(2), 115–138.
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
