Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Reviewed from Adversity Quotient: Systematic Literature Review

Ika Dhian Lestari, Dadang Juandi

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explain the findings of a study on students' mathematical problem-solving abilities, which were examined using the Adversity Quotient (AQ) type. This study uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method with the PRISMA protocol for all research articles indexed on Google Scholar, Garuda, ERIC, and Semantic. The sample in this study consisted of 29 publications about students' mathematical problem-solving abilities that were reviewed using the Adversity Quotient (AQ) and were published between 2018 and January 2023 in Indonesia. The findings of this study will be evaluated based on the year of publication, education level, research location, selected material, problem-solving phases used, and the AQ-based description of students' mathematical problem-solving ability. Using the SLR method, it was discovered that research on students' mathematical problem-solving abilities in terms of AQ type received a lot of attention each year, with the majority of this research being conducted at the junior high school education level with the Polya stage on the topic of algebra and on the island of Java. Furthermore, it was discovered that AQ effects students' characteristics in terms of mathematical problem solving abilities qualitatively by synthesizing the results of study on students' mathematical problem solving abilities in terms of AQ type.

Keywords

Mathematical problem-solving ability, Adversity Quotient, Systematic Literature Review

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdiyani, S.S., Khabibah, S., & Rahmawati, N.D. (2019). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMP berdasarkan langkah-langkah Polya ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 7(2), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v7i2.774

Afri, L. D. (2018). Hubungan adversity quotient dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa SMP pada pembelajaran matematika. AXIOM: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Matematika, 7(2).

Ariati, C. & Juandi, D. (2022). Kemampuan penalaran matematis: Systematic Literature Review," Lemma Lett. Math. Edu., 8(2), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.22202/jl.2022.v8i2.5745

Artigue, M., & Houdement, C. (2007). Problem solving in France: Didactic and curricular perspectives. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0048-x

Baharullah, Wahyudin, Usman, M.R., &Syam, N. (2022). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 1039-1051. http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4766

Barham, A. I. (2020). Investigating the development of pre-service teachers’ problem-solving strategies via problem-solving mathematics classes. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.129

Bassok, M. & Novick, L. R. (2012). Problem solving. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 413-432). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0021

Bradshaw, Z., & Hazell, A. (2017). Developing problem-solving skills in mathematics: A lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies.

Brahier, D. J. (2020). Teaching secondary and

middle school mathematics (6th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429052934

Burkhardt, H., & Bell, A. (2007). Problem solving in the United Kingdom. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0041-4

Cai, J., & Nie, B. (2007). Problem solving in Chinese mathematics education: Research and practice. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0042-3

Chabibah, L.N., Siswanah, E., & Tsani, D.F. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita barisan ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 199-210. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i2.29024

Clarke, D., Goos, M., & Morony, W. (2007). Problem solving and Working Mathematically: An Australian perspective. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 475–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0045-0

Common Core State Standards Initiative (2022). English language arts standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/

Dagan, M., Satianov, P., & Teicher, M. (2018). Creating Use of Different Representations as an Effective Means to Promote Cognitive Interest, Flexibility, Creative Thinking, and deeper understanding in the Teaching of Calculus. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 10(3–4), 41–51.

Doko, M.G.D., Sumadji, Farida, N. (2020). Analisis kemmapuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa berdasarkan tahapan Polya materi segiempat. RAINSTEK Jurnal Terapan Sains & Teknologi, 2(3), 228-235. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unikama.ac.id/index.php/jtst/article/download/3563/2865

Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Dekker, T., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., de Lange, J., & Wijers, M. (2007). Problem solving as a challenge for mathematics education in The Netherlands. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(5– 6), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0043-2

Faizah, S., Nusantara, T., Sudirman, & Rahardi, R. (2020). Exploring students’ thinking process in mathematical proof of abstract algebra based on Mason’s framework. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 871-884. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606156.pdf

Febrianti, T., Zakiah, N.E., Ruswana, A.M. (2022). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMP pada materi lingkaran ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). J-KIP (Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan), 3(2), 420-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/j-kip.v3i2.6569

Fitria, R. (2018). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa pada materi aritmatika sosial kelas VII SMP dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2(2), 786– 792.

Goulet-Lyle, M. P., Voyer, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2020). How does imposing a step-by-step solution method impact students’ approach to mathematical word problem solving? ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01098-w

Gözde, A. (2020). Non-routine problem solving performances of mathematics teacher candidates. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(5), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2020.3907

Greiff, S & Fischer, A. (2013). Measuring Complex Problem Solving: An educational application of psychological theories. Journal of Educational Research Online, 5(1), 38–58. http://www.j-e-ro.com/index.php/jero/article/download/338/160

Gusta, W., Gistituati, N., & Bentri, A. (2022). Analisis Adversity Quotient (AQ) terhadap motivasi belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran daring. Pembelajar: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan, dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 64-70.

Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi, N. (2019). TIMSS Indonesia (Trends in international mathematics and science study). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers.

Hakim, F. (2020). Faktor Adversity Quotient dalam Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Pembuktian Matematis Topik Teori Grup. 02(02), 90–98.

Haleva, L., Hershkovitz, A., & Tabach, M. (2021). Students’ Activity in an Online Learning Environment for Mathematics: The Role of Thinking Levels. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(4), 686–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120972057

Hannania, E., Siswono, T.Y.E., & Rahaju, E,B. (2022). Keterampilan pemecahan masalah kolaboratif siswa SMP yang berbeda Adversity Quotient pada materi segiempat. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 5(2), 471-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i2.10353

Hidayat, W. & Sari, V. T. A. (2019). Kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis dan adversity quotient siswa SMP. Jurnal Elemen, 5(2), 242–252.

Hidayat, W. & Sariningsih, R. (2018). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan Adversity Quotient siswa SMP melalui pembelajaran open ended. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(1), 109-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v2i1.1027

Hofifah, F., Siskawati, F.S., & Irawati, T. N. (2023). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMK ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. e-DuMath Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.52657/je.v9i1.1939

Indriyani, F., Nurcahyono, N. A., & Agustiani, N. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Berdasarkan Langkah Ideal Problem Solving. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.33373/pythagoras.v7i2.1296

Iskandar, R. S. F., & Juandi, D. (2022). Study Literature Review: Realistic Mathematics Education Learning on Students’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 6(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjmev6ì1.5739

Jiang, R., Liu, R. de, Star, J., Zhen, R., Wang, J., Hong, W., Jiang, S., Sun, Y., & Fu, X. (2021). How mathematics anxiety affects students’ inflexible perseverance in mathematics problem-solving: Examining the mediating role of cognitive reflection. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12364

Juandi, D., & Tamur, M. (2020). Pengantar Meta Analisis. UPI Press.

Juandi, D. (2021). Heterogenity of problem-based learning outcomes for improving mathematical competence: A systematic literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1722/1/012108

Kemendikbud. (2016). Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud

Khairunnisa, A., Juandi, D., & Gozali, S.M. (2022). Systematic Literature Review: Kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika," Jurnal Cendekia J. Pend. Mat., 6(2), 1846-1856. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1405

Laili, N. (2021). Hubungan Adversity Quotient dan hasil belajar matematika peserta didik dalam pembelajaran jarak jauh di SMP. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.jhass-0301.210

Lame, G. (2019). "Systematic literature reviews: An introduction", in Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED, 1633–1642.

Lestanti, M. M., Isnarto, I., & Supriyono, S. (2016). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari karakteristik cara berpikir siswa dalam Model Problem Based Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v5i1.9343

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 339. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

Lusiana, & Suryani, M. (2014). Metode SLR untuk Mengidentifikasi Isu-Isu dalam Software Engineering. SATIN (Sains Dan Teknol. Informasi), 3(1), 1–11. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp

Mailani, E. (2018). Potret Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) di Sekolah Dasar Kota Medan. Jurnal Pembangunan Perkotaan, 6(2), 102–111.

Maini, N. & Izzati, N. (2019). Analisis kemampuan penyelesaikan masalah matematis siswa berdasarkan langkah-langkah Brainsford & Stein ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Kiprah, 7(1), 27-31. Retrieved from https://ojs.umrah.ac.id/index.php/kiprah/article/download/1175/698

Moru, E. K., & Mathunya, M. (2022). A constructivist analysis of Grade 8 learners’ errors and misconceptions in simplifying mathematical algebraic expressions. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 7(3).

Nada, A., Prayitno, M., & Harun, L. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMA Kelas XI menurut langkah-langkah John Dewey ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient tipe campers. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v2i2.5775

Naimnule, M., Kehi,, Y.J., & Bone, D. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis berdasarkan langkah-langkah Polya ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient tipe quitter, camper dan climber pada siswa kelas VIII SMP. Jurnal Eduscience (JES), 9(2), 428-441 https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v9i2.2957

NCTM. (2017). Principles and Standards—National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://www.nctm.org/standards/

Ningrum, I. A. (2017). Analisis Tingkat Berfikir Kreatif Matematis Peserta Didik Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Kelas Viii Mts Muhammadiyah Bandar Lampung. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4766

Nordstrom, K., & Korpelainen, P. (2011). Creativity and inspiration for problem solving in engineering education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(4), 439-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.560379

Noviyana, H. (2018). Pengaruh model open ended terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMP. JURNAL E-DuMath, 4(2), 1–10.

Nugraheni, L.P., & Marsigit. (2021). Realistic Mathematics Education: An approach to improve problem solving ability in primary school. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(4), 511-518. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i4.19354

Nugroho, M., Kartono, & Isnarto. (2022). Analysis of student mathematics problem solving ability reviewed from Adversity Quotient (AQ) with dynamic assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, UJMER 11(1), 102 – 106. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/56496

Nurhayati, N., Subanji, & Rahardjo, S. (2022). Proses pemecahan masalah Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel berdasarkan Tahapan Mason ditinjau dari tipe Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 615-634. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i1.1239

Nurlaelah, A., & Ilyas, M. (2021). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SD. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 89– 97.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I, II, & III): Combined executive summary. OECD Publishing Paris.

PeranginAngin, R.B., Panjaitan, S., Hutauruk, A., Manik, E., & Tambunan, H. (2021). Arah trend penelitian Pendidikan matematika di Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika (JRPM). Vigotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 3(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.30736/voj.v3i1.340

Permatasari, Z., Sridana, N., Amrullah, & Sarjana, K. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa berdasarkan tingkat Adversity Quotient (AQ). Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 2(2), 437-448. https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v2i2.162

Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton.

Polya, G. (1978). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method second edition. In The Mathematical Gazette (Vol. 30, p. 181). http://www.jstor.org/stable/3609122?origin=crossref

Purnomo, E.A., Sukestiyarno, Y.L., Junaedi, I., & Agoestanto, A. (2022). Analysis of problem solving process on HOTS test for Integral Calculus. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 14(1). 199-214. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1361643

Rahmayantri, A. & Priatna, N. (2022). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa kelas VII dalam menyelesaikan soal aritmatika sosial berdasarkan tipe Adversity Quotient. Edumatsains: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 7(1), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.33541/edumatsains.v7i1.3920

Rahmi, D., Putra, M.A., & Kurniati, A. (2021). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis berdasarkan Adversity Quotient (AQ) siswa SMA. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 85-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v7i2.13306

Rott, B., Specht, B., & Knipping, C. (2021). A descriptive phase model of problemsolving processes. In ZDM - Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01244-3

Rum, A.M. & Juandi, D. (2022). Students’ mathematical literacy: Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Hipotenusa J. Math. Soc., 4(2), 148-164, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18326/hipotenusa.v4i2.8111

Saidah, S., & Aulia, L. A.-A. (2014). Hubungan self efficacy dengan adversity quotient (AQ). Jurnal Psikologi: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan, 2(2), 54–61.

Saniyyah, F., & Triyana, I. W. (2020). Analisis Penalaran Adaptif Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Adversity Quotient ( AQ ). 1(2), 121–129 .

Sari, I., Marwan, & Hajidin. (2019). Students’ thinking process in solving mathematical problems in build flat side spaces of material reviewed from Adversity Quotient. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 2(2), 61-67. : https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v2i2.1468

Schoenfeld. (2007). Problem solving in the United States, 1970–2008: research and theory, practice and politics. Zdm, 39(5–6), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0038-z

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sensemaking in mathematics. In D. A.

Grouws (Ed.). In Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning. MacMillan.

Septianingtyas, N., & Jusra, H. (2020). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis peserta didik berdasarkan Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 657– 672. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.263

Siahaan, E., & Surya, E. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Dalam Pelajaran Matematika. Medan: Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, FMIPA UNIMED.

Şimşek, İ., Uygun, T., & Güner, P. (2020). Problem solving performance and mathematics achievement : the mediating role of eye tracking. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(3), 1111–1124.

Siswanto, R. D., & Ratiningsih, R. P. (2020). Korelasi kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematis dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis materi bangun ruang. ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 96–103.

Supendi, A., & Nurjanah, N. (2020). Society 5.0: Is It High-Order Thinking? International Conference on Elementary Education, 2(1), 1054–1059.

Syaifudin, A. H. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa pada materi program linear kelas XI MIPA 1 MAN 2 Tulungagung Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019. Thesis. UIN Satu Tulungagung.

Szendrei, J. (2007). When the going gets tough, the tough gets going problem solving in Hungary, 1970-2007: Research and theory, practice and politics. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 39(5–6), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0037-0

Temur, Ö. D. (2012). Analysis of prospective classroom teachers’ teaching of mathematical modeling and problem solving. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.822a

Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Putra, G. W., & Iswara, B. (2019). Metode Systematic Literature Review untuk identifikasi platform dan metode pengembangan sistem informasi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems (IJIS), 1(2), 63–77.

Wahyuddin, W., Satriani, S., & Asfar, F. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan menyelesaikan Soal High Order Thinking Skills ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir logis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 521–535.

Yuwono, T., Supanggih, M., & Ferdiani, R. D. (2018). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita berdasarkan prosedur Polya. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 1(2), 137–144.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v13i1.73997

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.