Enhancing elementary students’ computational thinking through problem-based learning in science education
Abstract
The rapid advancement of digital technology has shifted educational priorities toward the development of higher-order thinking skills, including computational thinking. However, the integration of computational thinking into elementary science learning remains limited. This study aims to examine the effect of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) on students’ computational thinking skills in science education. A quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design was employed. The participants consisted of 40 fifth-grade students divided into an experimental group (n = 20) and a control group (n = 20), selected using a saturated sampling technique. The instrument was a descriptive test developed based on four computational thinking components: decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithms. Data were analyzed using normality and homogeneity tests followed by simple linear regression. The findings indicate that PBL has a statistically significant effect on students’ computational thinking skills (p < 0.05), with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.919. These results suggest that PBL is an effective instructional approach for fostering computational thinking skills in elementary science learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
Fulltext PDFReferences
Afana, R. M. N., Jupriyanto, J., & Sari, Y. (2023). The influence of the environmental approach on five-grade students’ critical thinking ability. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 12(2), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v12i2.57345
Angglena, D., Sapta, A., & Nurcahyono, N. A. (2026). The effect of interactive video-assisted problem based learning model on computational thinking skills based on student activeness. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 7(2), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i2.1436
Aytekin, A., & Topçu, M. S. (2026). How unplugged computational thinking shapes students’ creative thinking: evidence from the human nervous and endocrine systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10306-8
Bossér, U. (2024). Transformation of school science practices to promote functional scientific literacy. Research in Science Education, 54(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10138-1
Cateté, V., Lytle, N., Dong, Y., Boulden, D., Akram, B., Houchins, J., Barnes, T., Wiebe, E., Lester, J., Mott, B., & Boyer, K. (2018). Infusing computational thinking into middle grade science classrooms: Lessons learned. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3265757.3265778
Christensen, D., & Lombardi, D. (2024). Computational thinking through the lens of biological evolution learning : enhancing understanding through the levels of biological organization and computational complexity. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-024-00202-3
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative adn mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publication. Inc.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Darmawati, A. A. S. K., Tika, I. N., Artawan, P., & Redhana, I. W. (2025). Meta analysis: Efektifitas problem-based learning dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SD dalam pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(10), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i10.12209
Dinh, H. T.-T., & Nakatsubo, F. (2025). Teacher-child discourse in Vietnamese preschool classrooms: An exploratory case study of teachers’ questions and statements in the planned science activity. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53(4), 1253–1263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01718-5
Dong, Y., Ma, H., Li, H., Jing, B., & Liu, H. (2025). Effects of digital badges on pupils’ computational thinking and learning motivation in computer science. Acta Psychologica, 254(October 2024), 104824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104824
Fakhriyah, F., Masfuah, S., & Mardapi, D. (2019). Developing scientific literacy-based teaching materials to improve students’ computational thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 482–491. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.19259
Farris, A. V, & McLaughlin, G. (2024). Getting a grip on how we talk about computational practices in science in settings of teacher learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1922–1940. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12976
Firneno, T. J., Welsh, G. T., Nimlos, P. J., & Larson, E. L. (2023). “I think”: integrating project-based learning and case study to teach fundamentals of evolutionary tree-thinking. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-023-00192-8
Galamba, A., & Matthews, B. (2021). Science education against the rise of fascist and authoritarian movements: towards the development of a pedagogy for democracy. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16, 581–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-10002-y
Hashim, R., & Alias, H. (2020). Developing high-order thinking in primary school students through qur’anic stories and the hikmah pedagogy of philosophical inquiry. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v8i1.315
Hsu, T., Chang, S., & Hung, Y. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126(June), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
Jupriyanto, J., Sari, Y., Hidayah, R., & Salimi, M. (2025). Nature ’s power: Integrating STEAM in outdoor learning to unlocking enhance 4C skills and science pedagogical knowledge. EduBasic Journal : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 7(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.17509/ebj.v7i1.82364
Killen, H., Coenraad, M., Byrne, V., Cabrera, L., Mills, K., Ketelhut, D. J., & Plane, J. D. (2023). Teacher education to integrate computational thinking into elementary science: A design-based research study. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 23(4), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3618115
Lamanauskas, V. (2022). Natural science education in primary school: some significant points. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(6), 908–910. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.908
Lee, I. A., Rabinowitz, G., Gupta, P., & Chaffee, R. (2026). Decoding agent-based models supports students’ mechanistic and causal reasoning about scientific phenomena. International Journal of STEM Education, 13(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-026-00601-6
Leftwich, A., Brown, M., Publow, M., & Gavrilas, L. (2026). Elementary computer science education legislation : an ECEP state analysis for broadening participation in computing. Frontiers in Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1800422
López, A. C. C., Marín, A. A. L., De las Heras Pérez, M. Á., & Stepanovic, M. B. (2024). The concept of pH and its logarithmic scale: A Micro Bit experience through inquiry, modeling, and computational thinking. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14378
Maharani, S., Yuniahastuti, I. T., Prastyaningrum, I., Susanti, V. D., & Romandoni, H. R. (2024). Computational thinking in elementary school students: A bibliometric review. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 16(2), 1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v16i2.5824
Misir, S. K., & Emir, S. (2023). A Review Of Computational Thinking: Focus on Science Education. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 8(24), 2892–2917. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.701
O’Toole, J. M., McKoy, K., Freestone, M., & Osborn, J.-A. (2020). ‘Scientific literacy’: An exercise in model building. Education Sciences, 10(8), 204. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10080204
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education: Vol. I. OECD Publishing.
Ogegbo, A. A., & Ramnarain, U. (2022). A systematic review of computational thinking in science classrooms. Studies in Science Education, 58(2), 203–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1963580
Paraskevopoulou-Kollia, E.-A., Michalakopoulos, C., Zygouris, N. C., & Bagos, P. G. (2025). Computational thinking in primary and pre-school children: A systematic review of the literature. Education Sciences, 15(8), 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080985
Pearce, J., Stones, A., Reiss, M. J., & Mujtaba, T. (2021). ‘Science is purely about the truth so I don’t think you could compare it to non-truth versus the truth.’ Students’ perceptions of religion and science, and the relationship(s) between them: religious education and the need for epistemic literacy. British Journal of Religious Education, 43(2), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2019.1635434
Poulakis, E., Politis, P., & Roussos, P. (2026). Development and validation of the computational thinking assessment tool DACT. Computers, 15(3), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15030165
Purwati, R., & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Problem-based learning modules with socio-scientific issues topics to closing the gap in argumentation skills. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 18(4), 35–45. https://tojet.net/articles/v18i4/1844.pdf
Saputra, A., Saprudin, S., & Sambiri, U. (2023). The analysis of pre-service physics teachers’ computational thinking skills in designing computer simulations of projectile motion using the scratch application. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 3(4), 629–637. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline2210
Sesigür, A., & Edeer, Ş. (2020). Place-based critical art education: An action research. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 21(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.26209/ijea21n25
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003
Starke, G., De Clercq, E., & Elger, B. S. (2021). Towards a pragmatist dealing with algorithmic bias in medical machine learning. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 24(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10008-5
Sungur, S., & Ozkan, G. (2026). Coding science: The role of block-based programming activities in enhancing computational thinking and science achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10317-5
Vogelzang, J., Admiraal, W. F., & van Driel, J. H. (2020). Effects of Scrum methodology on students’ critical scientific literacy: the case of Green Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(3), 940–952. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RP00066C
Winarto, Putri, A. F., Fahrezy, M., Arti, Y., Kristyaningrum, D. H., Rahayu, R., Ariyatun, & Hayu, W. R. R. (2025). How to improve students’ problem-solving skills and environmental awareness: A study of the impact of worksheet problem-based learning on local potential of landfills Bantul region. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(12), 2025564. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025564
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communication of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.111821
Zhao, H., Yu, J., & Li, G. (2026). Developing a process-oriented classroom observation protocol for assessing high school students ’ computational thinking in science classrooms : a Rasch-based proficiency framework. Frontiers in Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1722422
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
