Mapping socioscientific issues research in science education: Trends, pedagogy, competencies, and gaps (2021-2025)

Rifat Shafwatul Anam, Ahmad Yani

Abstract

Amid increasing global challenges characterized by uncertainty, complexity, and ethical dilemmas, socioscientific issues (SSI) have emerged as a critical framework for advancing science education. This study systematically examines research trends, pedagogical approaches, competencies, and research gaps in SSI studies. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using the PRISMA protocol on 53 open-access articles published between 2021 and 2025 in selected high-impact Scopus Q1 journals. The findings reveal a growing concentration of SSI research within the selected corpus, particularly in recent publications. Qualitative approaches dominate, with studies largely situated in secondary and higher education contexts. Research primarily focuses on environmental and health-related issues, while argumentation, inquiry-based learning, and discussion are the most frequently applied pedagogical approaches. SSI-based learning fosters multidimensional competencies across cognitive, epistemic, and affective domains. However, key gaps persist, including limited thematic diversity, underrepresentation of primary education, insufficient integration of emerging technologies, and a lack of large-scale and longitudinal designs. This study underscores the need for broader implementation, methodological diversification, and technology integration. Limitations related to the bounded corpus and open-access selection are acknowledged, which may affect generalizability.

Keywords

socioscientific issues; science education; systematic literature review; PRISMA; scientific literacy

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References

Agustian, H. Y. (2025). The critical role of understanding epistemic practices in science teaching using wicked problems. Science & Education, 34(1), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00471-2

Bächtold, M., Pallarès, G., De Checchi, K., & Munier, V. (2023). Combining debates and reflective activities to develop students’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(4), 761–806. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21816

Ballard, H. L., Calabrese Barton, A., & Upadhyay, B. (2023). Community-driven science and science education: Living in and navigating the edges of equity, justice, and science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(8), pp. 1613–1626). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21880

Baltikian, M., Kärkkäinen, S., & Kukkonen, J. (2025). Adolescents’ attitudes toward climate change urgency: the role of scientific literacy and socio-scientific engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2573050

Bautista, J. (2025). It can’t just be science: preservice elementary science teachers’ ideas for teaching a social justice science issue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 20(3), 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-025-10253-7

Ben Zvi Assaraf, O., Dawson, V., Eilam, E., Gokpinar, T., Goldman, D., Naugauker, N., Eka Putri, G. A. P., Subiantoro, A. W., Tolppanen, S., White, P., Widdop Quinton, H., & Dillon, J. (2025). Climate change education implementation: the voices of policymakers, professional development providers, and teachers in five countries. International Journal of Science Education, 47(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2314572

Bossér, U., & Lindahl, M. (2021). Teachers’ coordination of dialogic and authoritative discourses promoting specific goals in socioscientific issue-based teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(3), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10061-1

Cagle, S. M., Anderson, A. A., & Kelp, N. C. (2025). Stop the spread: Empowering students to address misinformation through community-engaged, interdisciplinary science communication training. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(3), 721–755. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21971

Christodoulou, A., & Grace, M. (2025). Becoming ‘Wild Citizens’: Children’s articulation of environmental citizenship in the context of biodiversity loss. Science & Education, 34(3), 969–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00558-4

Christodoulou, A., Levinson, R., Davies, P., Grace, M., Nicholl, J., & Rietdijk, W. (2021). The use of Cartography of Controversy within socioscientific issues-based education: students’ mapping of the badger-cattle controversy in England. International Journal of Science Education, 43(15), 2479–2500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1970852

Covitt, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (2022). Untangling trustworthiness and uncertainty in science. Science & Education, 31(5), 1155–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00322-6

Dawson, V. (2024). Teachers’ support in developing year 7 students’ argumentation skills about water-based socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 46(3), 222–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2226334

Dunlop, L., Atkinson, L., & Turkenburg-van Diepen, M. (2021). The environment and politics in science education: the case of teaching fracking. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(2), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10017-z

Durak, B., & Topçu, M. S. (2025). Exploring teachers’ professional development on socioscientific issues and model-based learning: A multiple case study. Science & Education, 34(6), 4451–4490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00628-1

Gandolfi, H. E. (2025). (Re)considering nature of science education in the face of socio-scientific challenges and injustices. Science & Education, 34(6), 3799–3825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00536-w

García-Carmona, A. (2021). Learning about the nature of science through the critical and reflective reading of news on the COVID-19 pandemic. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(4), 1015–1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10092-2

Garrecht, C., & Adler, I. K. (2025). Unclouding judgment: advocating for greater attention to cognitive biases in socioscientific decision-making on climate change. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 21(1), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-025-10275-1

Garrecht, C., Czinczel, B., Kretschmann, M., & Reiss, M. J. (2023). ‘Should we be doing it, should we not be doing it, who could be harmed?’ Science & Education, 32(6), 1761–1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00342-2

Garrecht, C., Reiss, M. J., & Harms, U. (2021). ‘I wouldn’t want to be the animal in use nor the patient in need’ – the role of issue familiarity in students’ socioscientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 2065–2086. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1950944

Garthwaite, K., Birdsall, S., & France, B. (2023). Exploring risk perceptions: a new perspective on analysis. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 18(4), 1195–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10199-8

Gisewhite, R. A. (2023). A whale of a time: engaging in a war of values for youth activism in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 18(4), 1285–1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-022-10140-5

Ha, H., Park, W., & Song, J. (2023). Preservice elementary teachers’ socioscientific reasoning during a decision-making activity in the context of COVID-19. Science & Education, 32(6), 1869–1886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00359-7

Herman, B. C., Poor, S., Clough, M. P., Rao, A., Kidd, A., De Jesús, D., & Varghese, D. (2024). It’s not just a science thing: Educating future STEM professionals through mis/disinformation responsive instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(8), 1925–1974. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21934

Högström, P., Gericke, N., Wallin, J., & Bergman, E. (2025). Teaching socioscientific issues: a systematic review. Science & Education, 34(5), 3079–3122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00542-y

Imaduddin, M., Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2025). Implications of the concept of glocalization for science education for sustainability with a specific view on promoting water literacy. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00695-4

Johnson, V., Butterfuss, R., Harsch, R., & Kendeou, P. (2025). Patterns of belief and trust in climate change information. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(3), 655–683. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21967

Kolstø, S. D., Paulsen, V. H., & Mestad, I. (2024). Critical thinking in the making: students’ critical thinking practices in a multifaceted SSI project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 19(4), 499–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-024-10217-3

Krell, M., Garrecht, C., & Minkley, N. (2024). Preservice biology teachers’ socioscientific argumentation: analyzing structural and content complexity in the context of a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10364-z

Leung, J. S. C., & Cheng, M. M. W. (2023). Prioritizing emotion objects in making sense of student learning of socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(2), 357–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21801

Lymbouridou, C. (2025). Science for ethics in SSI discussions. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 20(3), 389–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-025-10258-2

Miani, L., Bitsaki, C., Metaxas, I., Stavrou, D., & Levrini, O. (2025). Embracing complexity and uncertainties to deal with climate change challenges: An interdisciplinary module for preservice teacher education. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00658-9

Morales-Doyle, D., & Rajski, T. G. (2025). Entangled in the chemical industry. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00674-9

Newton, M. H., & Annetta, L. A. (2025). The influence of extended reality on climate change education. Science & Education, 34(2), 825–845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00518-y

Ottander, K., & Simon, S. (2021). Learning democratic participation? Meaning-making in discussion of socioscientific issues in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1895–1925. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1946200

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Park, W., Erduran, S., & Guilfoyle, L. (2022). Secondary teachers’ instructional practices on argumentation in the context of science and religious education. International Journal of Science Education, 44(8), 1251–1276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2074565

Park, W., Erduran, S., Song, J., & Kim, M. (2023). “It’s a lesson with no correct answer”: design issues in preservice teachers’ use of history of science for lesson planning. International Journal of Science Education, 45(3), 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2154132

Park, W., Lim, I., & Song, J. (2024). Exploring the intersection of disasters and science education with preservice science teachers through a disaster case study. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 19(4), 593–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-024-10225-3

Park, W., Shaby, N., & Newman, R. (2025). ‘We often forget it was a disaster’: Cross-curricular teacher collaboration to develop a curriculum unit on the Titanic disaster. Science & Education, 34(3), 1087–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00540-0

Pimentel, D. R. (2025). Learning to evaluate sources of science (mis)information on the internet: Assessing students’ scientific online reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(3), 684–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21974

Rasa, T., Lavonen, J., & Laherto, A. (2024). Agency and transformative potential of technology in students’ images of the future. Science & Education, 33(5), 1145–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00432-9

Rautio, P., Tammi, T., Aivelo, T., Hohti, R., Kervinen, A., & Saari, M. (2022). “For whom? By whom?”: Critical perspectives of participation in ecological citizen science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17(3), 765–793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10099-9

Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101

Şen, A., & Öztuna Kaplan, A. (2025). Reflections of pre-service science teachers’ understanding of the nature of science on a socioscientific issue. Science & Education, 34(6), 4405–4431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00619-2

Smit, R., Rietz, F., & Büchel, D. (2025). Using the socioscientific issue approach to foster secondary students’ argumentation skills, science self-efficacy beliefs and science interest. International Journal of Science Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2460050

Smith, B. E., Carlone, H. B., Ziegler, H., Janumyan, Y., Conley, Z., Chen, J., & Jen, T. (2025). Youths’ investigations of critical urban forestry through multimodal sensemaking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(3), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10127-7

Steube, M., Wilde, M., & Basten, M. (2024). Does role play manipulate students? Persuasive effects of role play on students’ attitude and behavior regarding a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(7), 1609–1640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21910

Teshera-Levye, J., Alam, I., Corwin, L., & Dauer, J. M. (2025). Developing a conceptual model for students’ scientific civic engagement self-concept. International Journal of Science Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2449220

Tofel-Grehl, C. (2023). “There is no room for me, for a Hawaiian, in science”: Rightful presence in community science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(8), 1879–1911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21849

Tofel-Grehl, C., Hansen, T., Penrod, C., & Ellis, M. (2025). Pixels in a larger picture: A scoping review of the uses of technology for climate change education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(3), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10183-z

Tolbert, S., Hipkins, R., Cowie, B., & Waiti, P. (2025). Epistemic agency, Indigenous knowledge, and the school science curriculum: reflections from Aotearoa New Zealand. International Journal of Science Education, 47(15–16), 1986–2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2356229

Tuncay-Yüksel, B., Yılmaz-Tüzün, Ö., & Zeidler, D. L. (2023). Epistemological beliefs and values as predictors of preservice science teachers’ environmental moral reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(9), 2111–2144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21889

Vicente, J. J., Franco-Mariscal, A. J., & Oliva, J. M. (2025). Enhancing argumentation and decision-making of preservice early childhood education teachers through role-playing on animal experimentation. Science & Education, 34(5), 2957–2989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00529-9

Viciana, H., Astobiza, A. M., Fasce, A., & Hannikainen, I. R. (2025). Scientifically together, politically apart? Science & Education, 34(5), 3615–3638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00587-z

Yavuzkaya, M., Hasslöf, H., & Sjöström, J. (2025). Contextualising an international science curriculum in the anthropocene. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-025-00675-8

Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jdc.v10i1.116867

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.