Analisis gaya belajar siswa Generasi Z dalam perspektif social cognitive theory

Patmisari Patmisari, Siti Irene Astuti Dwiningrum

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan kecenderungan gaya belajar mahasiswa Generasi Z dalam konteks pembelajaran digital serta menjelaskannya melalui kerangka Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah survei kuantitatif deskriptif, dengan pengumpulan data menggunakan instrumen Index of Learning Styles (ILS) yang telah diterjemahkan dan disesuaikan ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Instrumen disebarkan secara daring kepada 309 responden berusia 13–19 tahun di wilayah Solo Raya menggunakan teknik purposive–incidental sampling, dengan analisis data berupa statistik deskriptif berbasis distribusi persentase. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa gaya belajar visual mendominasi (54%), diikuti asimilatif, sedangkan dimensi aktif–reflektif dan sequential–global berada pada kategori rendah. Temuan ini menunjukkan adanya preferensi kuat terhadap pembelajaran berbasis observasi visual, fleksibilitas strategi belajar, dan pemanfaatan lingkungan digital dalam mengakses informasi. Berdasarkan konstruk SCT, gaya belajar Gen Z merupakan hasil interaksi tiga faktor, yaitu personal (preferensi visual, efikasi diri), behavioral (strategi belajar mandiri, observasional), dan environmental (paparan teknologi digital yang intens). Simpulan penelitian menegaskan pentingnya desain pembelajaran adaptif, visual, dan berbasis teknologi dalam mendukung keterlibatan serta optimalisasi potensi belajar Generasi Z.

 

Analysis of Generation Z students' learning styles from a social cognitive theory perspective

 

Abstract: This study aims to map the learning style tendencies of Generation Z students in digital learning environments and explain them through the lens of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). A quantitative descriptive survey method was employed using the Index of Learning Styles (ILS) instrument, which was translated and culturally adapted into Indonesian. Data were collected online from 309 respondents aged 13–19 years in the Solo Raya region using purposive–incidental sampling. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted using percentage distribution. The findings revealed a dominant visual learning style (54%) followed by assimilative tendencies, while the active–reflective and sequential–global dimensions scored low. These results indicate a strong preference for visual observation-based learning, flexible strategies, and technology-driven information access. Within the SCT framework, the learning styles of Generation Z are shaped by reciprocal interactions between personal factors (visual preference, self-efficacy), behavioral factors (self-regulated observational learning), and environmental factors (intensive exposure to digital media). The study concludes that adaptive, visually rich, and technology-integrated instructional designs are essential for enhancing learning engagement and optimizing the educational potential of Generation Z learners.

Keywords

Generasi Z; Gaya Belajar; Social Cognitive Theory; Pembelajaran Digital; Index of Learning Styles

References

Alruthaya, A., Nguyen, T.-T., & Lokuge, S. (2021). The Application of Digital Technology and the Learning Characteristics of Generation Z in Higher Education. Acis 2021 Australasian Conference on Information Systems Proceedings. Arkhipova, M. V., Belova, E. E., Gavrikova, Y. A., Pleskanyuk, T. N., & Arkhipov, A. N. (2019). Reaching generation Z. attitude toward technology among the newest generation of school students. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 726). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90835-9_114 Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2006). Using social cognitive theory to predict students’ use of self-regulated learning strategies in online courses . In 37th Annual Conference of the Northeastern Educational Research Association. Asmyatullin, R. R. (2021). Digital Transformation of the World Market for Educational Services. In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 280). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80485-5_23 Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. Çankaya, İ., Tan, Ç., & Balıkçı, S. (2020). Generation Z Support Autonomous Management in School: Evaluation of Teacher Candidates’ Views. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3311 Capello, M. A., & Al-Khashti, B. (2020). Considerations and new approaches for talent development of gen-Z in oil and gas. Proceedings SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2020-Octob. Chairunisa, H., Sahara, S., Karimah, M., Lubis, W. M., Gultom, D. V., & Limayasi, C. N. (2024). Strategi Komunikasi Pendidikan untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan di Era Gen Z. El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat , 4(5). https://doi.org/10.47467/elmujtama.v4i5.3146 Chen, R. (2023). Generation Z Students Characteristics and Attitude in a Chinese English Language Teaching Classroom. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 2(1), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2/2022458 Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson. Dunn, R. (1993). Learning Styles of the Multiculturally Diverse. Emergency Librarian, 20(4), 24–32. Eishani, K. A., Saa’d, E. A., & Nami, Y. (2014). The Relationship between Learning Styles and Creativity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.655 Elnovreny, J. (2021). TRAINING IN THE USE OF THE QUIZIZZ APPLICATION FOR IMPRESSIVE AND MODERN ONLINE LEARNING FOR THE Z GENERATION. International Journal of Engagement and Empowerment (IJE2), 1(2), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.53067/ije2.v1i2.20 Felder, R. M. (1996). MATTERS OF STYLE. In ASEE Prism (Vol. 6, Issue 4). Felder, R. M. (1999). Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228403640 Felder, R. M., Brent, R., & Prince, M. J. (2011). Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 89–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00005.x Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (n.d.). Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles*. Galingan, R. L. (2019). Modelling Student Satisfaction Through I-E-M Method for Improved Learning Experience of Selected Generation y and Z Engineering Students. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 935–939. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978623 Graf, S., Liu, T.-C., Kinshuk, Chen, N.-S., & Yang, S. J. H. (2009). Learning styles and cognitive traits – Their relationship and its benefits in web-based educational systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1280–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.06.005 Keefe, J. W. (1985). Assessment of learning style variables: The NASSP task force model. Theory Into Practice, 24(2), 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848509543162 Khan, I. A., & Al-Shibami, A. H. (2019). Generation Z’s learning preferences: Impact on organisational learning and development - A study conducted in a vocational institute in UAE. International Journal of Learning and Change, 11(4), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2019.105646 Krosnick, J. A., Lavrakas, P. J., & Kim, N. (2014). Survey research. Kumar, M., & Mamgain, P. (2023). Generation-Z Student Video-Based Learning Pedagogy Preference and Teaching Challenges. In Redefining Virtual Teaching Learning Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119867647.ch9 Manzoni, B., Caporarello, L., Cirulli, F., & Magni, F. (2021). The preferred learning styles of generation z: Do they differ from the ones of previous generations? Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 37, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47539-0_5 Mellman, L., Williams, M. K., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2021). Using Generation Z’s Learning Approaches to Create Meaningful Online Learning (pp. 149–169). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7222-1.ch008 Melo, D. F., & Stockemer, D. (2014). Age and political participation in Germany, France and the UK: A comparative analysis. Comparative European Politics, 12(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2012.31 Mládková, L. (2017). Learning habits of generation Z students. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management Eckm, 2, 698–703. Richard Felder, by M. (2002). LEARNING AND TEACHING STYLES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION. http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSpage.html Tabatabaei, S., Bulgarova, B. A., Volkova, I. I., Barabash, V. V., Kotecha, K., & Patil, S. (2024). Digital citizenship and paradigm shift in generation z’s emotional communication: Social media’s role in shaping Iranian familial bonds. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.5443 Turner, A. M., & Gurenlian, J. R. (2023). A comparison of Generation Z and Millennial dental hygiene students’ preferred learning styles. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12727 Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129106

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.