Analysis of ASA and Wood Characteristics with Variations in Thickness and Infill Density as 3D Printing Phantom Radiology Material

Suharyana Suharyana, Mohtar Yunianto, Ivara Salsabila Putri Aldicia

Abstract

This research was conducted to identify wood filaments and ASA as potential organ phantoms based on material density, CT number, electron density, effective atomic number, and radiation dose parameters. The thickness and density of the samples were varied to determine the effect on each parameter. The sample image was obtained from a CTScan radiology test with the same exposure factor. The potential of samples as organ phantoms varies for each parameter. In wood filament samples, a thickness of 1 cm to 2 cm with a density of 20% can potentially be a lung organ phantom. Meanwhile, at a thickness of 5 cm with a density of 100%, it can potentially act as a phantom for bone, liver and muscle organs. In ASA filament samples with a thickness of 1 cm to 5 cm with a low density of 20%, it has the potential to be a lung organ phantom and at a density of 100% it has the potential to be an adipose tissue phantom.

 

Keywords

radiodiagnostics; phantoms; Acrylic Styrene Acrylonitrile (ASA) ; wood

Full Text:

PDF

References

  1. Morihito, R. V., Chungdinata, S. E., Nazareth, T. A., Pulukadang, M. I., Makalew, R. A., & Pinontoan, B. 2017. Identifikasi Perubahan Struktur DNA Terhadap Pembentukan Sel Kanker Menggunakan Dekomposisi Graf. Jurnal Ilmiah Sains, 17(2), 153-160.
  2. Rifai, A., & Prabowo, Y. 2022. Diagnosis Kanker Paru-Paru dengan Sistem Fuzzy. Krea-TIF: Jurnal Teknik Informatika, 10(1), 19-28.
  3. Irsal, M., & Winarno, G. 2020. Pengaruh Parameter Milliampere-Second (mAs) terhadap Kualitas Citra Dan Dosis Radiasi Pada Pemeriksaan CT scan Kepala Pediatrik. Jurnal Fisika Flux: Jurnal Ilmiah Fisika FMIPA Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, 17(1), 1-8.
  4. Wang, K., Ho, C. C., Zhang, C., & Wang, B. 2017. A Review on the 3D Printing of Functional Structures for Medical Phantoms and Regenerated Tissue and Organ Applications. Engineering, 3(5), 653-662.
  5. Mislan & Mulyono, S. 2022. Potensi 3D Printing Sebagai Media Edukasi dalam Pendidikan Keperawatan. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 1(5), 895-908.
  6. Savi, M., Andrade, M. A., & Potiens, M. P. 2020. Commercial Filament Testing for Use in 3D Printed Phantoms. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 174, 108906.
  7. Ma, X., Buschmann, M., Unger, E., & Homolka, P. 2021. Classification of X-ray Attenuation Properties of Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Materials Using Computed Tomography from 70 to 140 kVp. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 1098
  8. Melinda, T., Hidayanto, E., & Arifin, Z. 2014. Pengaruh Perubahan Faktor Eksposi Terhadap Nilai CT Number. Youngster Physics Journal, 3(3), 269-278.
  9. Guswantoro, T., Supratman, A. S., & Asih, I. S. 2020. Karakterisasi Alginat Sebagai Bahan Setara dengan Jaringan Lunak untuk Radioterapi. EduMatSains: Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika dan Sains, 4(2), 125-138.
  10. Gerber, T. C., Kuzo, R. S., & Morin, R. L. 2005. Techniques and Parameters for Estimating Radiation Exposure and Dose in Cardiac Computed Tomography. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 21, 165-176.
  11. Chang, K. P., Hung, S. H., Chie, Y. H., Shiau, A. C., & Huang, R. J. 2012. A Comparison of Physical and Dosimetric Properties of Lung Substitute Materials. Medical Physics, 39(4), 2013-2020.
  12. Mandala, A. R. D., Hidayat, F.R., Primadian, R., Sutopo, W., Yuniaristanto, dan Prianjani, D. 2022. Perbandingan Metode Trend Line Analysis dan Metode Jaringan Syaraf Tiruan Backpropagation untuk Peramalan Permintaan Koran. Performa: Media Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 21(2), 78-87
  13. Fitriani, A. N. 2021. Selang Kepercayaan Koefisien Korelasi Berdasarkan Empirical Likelihood dan Penerapannya pada Data Rata-Rata Lama Sekolah dan Penduduk Miskin Kota/Kabupaten di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Statistika, 51-56.
  14. Budiwati, T., Budiyono, A., Setyawati, W., & Indrawati, A. 2010. Analisis Korelasi Pearson untuk Unsur-Unsur Kimia Air Hujan di Bandung. Jurnal Sains Dirgantara, 7(2).
  15. CIRS Model 062M. 2022. Electron Density Phantom. https://www.sunnuclear.com/documents/datasheets/gammex/ct_electron_density_phantom.pdf
  16. Gammex (A Sun Nuclear Company). 2015. CT Electron Density Phantom. https://www.sunnuclear.com/documents/datasheets/gammex/ct_electron_density_phantom.pdf.
  17. Gerber, T. C., Kuzo, R. S., & Morin, R. L. 2005. Techniques and Parameters for Estimating Radiation Exposure and Dose in Cardiac Computed Tomography. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 21, 165-176.
  18. ISIS Phantom Cube. (2023). ISIS Phantom Cube - Radiation Products Design. https://www.rpdinc.com/isis-phantom-cube-3574.html

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/ijap.v15i1.110516

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.