EVALUATION OF PATIENT-SPECIFIC QUALITY ASSURANCE (PSQA) USING OCTAVIUS 4D IN IMRT PLANNING FOR NASOPHARYNGEAL CANCER CASES

Endarko Endarko, Rizki Budi Rahayu, Rustika Alifiani, Aditya Prayugo Hariyanto, Levina Almira

Abstract

Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA) is an important procedure for verifying the accuracy of dose planning before administering radiation therapy to patients. This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of dose distribution in three variations of IMRT plans for nasopharyngeal cancer cases in two patients using the PTW Octavius 4D phantom and Verisoft software. Three irradiation plans were created based on variations in the optimization objectives for organ risk at the TPS, namely Plan0 (no optimization), Plan1 (moderate priority optimization for the parotid gland, brainstem, and spinal cord), and Plan2 (high priority optimization for the parotid gland, brain stem, and spinal cord). PSQA measurements were performed using a gamma index with criteria of 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm. The fluence map results showed that all irradiation plans had fluence patterns consistent with the TPS calculations without significant deviations in areas outside the target. The gamma passing rate (GPR) values for the 3%/2 mm criterion were 97.1−99.8% for Plan0, 96.1%−98.6% for Plan1, and 95.5%−99.5% for Plan2, all of which were above the tolerance limit of ≥95% as recommended by AAPM TG-218. For the 2%/2 mm criterion, all plans achieved a GPR above 90%, in accordance with the AAPM TG-119 standard for complex IMRT plans. These results indicate that the linac dose delivery system and MLC movement function consistently and are capable of reproducing the fluence according to TPS calculations. Thus, the use of Octavius 4D as the PSQA standard was effective for verifying the accuracy of IMRT plans in this study, and the 3%/2 mm criterion is recommended as a clinical evaluation parameter.

 

Keywords

PSQA; IMRT; Octavius 4D; Gamma index

References

Fischer-Valuck B. W., Rao, Y. J., and Michalski JM. 2018. Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2018;7(3):297-307, doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.16

Pacelli, R., Caroprese, M., Palma, G., Oliviero, C., Clemente, S., Cella, L., and Conson, M. 2019. Technological Evolution of Radiation Treatment: Implications For Clinical Applications. Seminars in Oncology Volume 46, Issue 3, June 2019, Pages 193-201

Yoganathan, S. A., Mani, K. R., Das, K. J. M., Agarwal, A., and Kumar, S. 2011. Dosimetric Effect of Multileaf Collimator Leaf Width in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Delivery Techniques for Small- And Large-Volume Targets. J Med Phys. 2011 Apr-Jun;36(2):72–77, doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.79690

Zhu, H., Zhu, Q., Wang, Z., Yang, B., Zhang, W., and Qiu, J. 2022. Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Prediction Models Based nn Machine Learning for Novel Dual-Layered MLC Linac. Medical Physics Volume 50, Issue 2 pp. 1205-1214. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16091

Ni, Q., Chen, L., Tan, J., Pang, J., Luo, L., Zhu, J., and Yang, X. 2024. Predicting The PSQA Results of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Based nn Dosiomics Features: A Multi-Center Study. Front. Phys. 12:1387608, doi: 10.3389/fphy.2024.1387608

Listiono, F. I., Noor, J. A. E., Herwiningsih, S., Dwiyono, A. G., Martono, S., Nugroho, R. S., and Petrarizky, A. J. 2025. Implementation of AAPM TG-218 for Patient Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA) in The Case of Thoracic Target Region Using IMRT Technique with EPID ASi-1200“, Indonesian Physical Review, vol. 8, no. 3, p 690 699, 2025, https://doi.org/10.29303/ip r.v8i3.502.

Das, S., Kharade, V., Pandey V, et al. 2022. Gamma Index Analysis as a Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Tool for High-Precision Radiotherapy: A Clinical Perspective of Single Institute Experience. Cureus 14(10): e30885, doi: 10.7759/cureus.30885

Mrčela, I., Gregov, M., Matanić, A., Budanec, M., Murgić, J., Jakšić, B., Prpić, M., Sečan, A. P., and Frobe, A. 2022. Dosimetric Verification of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Treatment Plans for Prostate Cancer Patients. Acta Clin Croat (Suppl. 3) 2022; 61:21-27, doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s3.3

Low, D. A., Harms, W. B., Mutic, S., and Purdy, J. A. 1998. A Technique for The Quantitative Evaluation of Dose Distribution. Med Phys. 1998, 25:656-61, doi: 10.1118/1.598248

Teichert, K. et al. 2019. Targeted Multi-Criteria Optimisation in IMRT Planning Supplemented by Knowledge Based Model Creation. Oper. Res. Heal. Care, vol. 23, p. 100185, 2019.

Shin, H. B., Noh, Y. Y., Kim, H., Kim, C., Sung, K. H., and Kim, D. W. 2024. Correction Method for Depth and Field Size Dependence in Octavius 1000 SRS Patient-Specific QA. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 223 (2024) 111892.

Dogan, N., Mijnheer, B.J., Padgett, K., Nalichowski, A., Wu, C., Nyflot, M. J., Olch, A. J., Papanikolaou, N., Shi, J., Holmes, S. M., Moran, J., and Greer, P. B. 2023. AAPM Task Group Report 307: Use of EPIDs for Patient-Specific IMRT and VMAT QA. Med Phys. 2023;50:e865–e903., doi:10.1002/mp.16536

Deng J., Liu S. Y., Huang Y., Li X., and Wu X. 2024. Evaluating AAPM-TG-218 Recommendations: Gamma Index Tolerance and Action Limits in IMRT and VMAT Quality Assurance Using SunCHECK. J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1–12, 2024.

Ezzell, G. A., Burmeister J. W., Dogan, N., LoSasso, T. J., Mechalakos, J. G., Mihailidis, D., Molineu, A., Palta, J. R., Ramsey, C. R., Salter, B. J., Shi, J., Xia, P., Yue, N. J., and Xiao, Y. 2009. IMRT Commissioning: Multiple Institution Planning and Dosimetry Comparisons, A Report From AAPM Task Group 119. Med. Phys. 36 (11) November 2009.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.