Performance and Pressure Drop Study on Shell and Tube and Double Pipe Heat Exchangers

Teodora Maria Fernandes Brito Da Silva, Kholifahtul Nisa, Puspita Anggraeni, Nurur Rifky Wibowo, Thomas Azziz Alathif

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Heat exchangers are essential equipment in various industrial processes, where hydrodynamic characteristics such as pressure drop play a role in determining performance and operational safety. This study aims to directly compare the pressure drop characteristics and the (DG/μ)av parameter relationship between shell-and-tube and double-pipe heat exchangers at a laboratory scale. Experiments were conducted with varying fluid flow rates in the range of 0.8–1.2 GPM. Pressure drop values were measured using a U-tube manometer, while the (DG/μ)av parameter was calculated based on the physical properties of the fluid at the average operating temperature. The experimental results indicate that increasing the flow rate causes an increase in pressure drop in both types of heat exchangers. However, a direct comparison at the same flow rate conditions shows clear differences in the hydrodynamic characteristics. The double-pipe heat exchanger exhibits a more consistent pressure drop relationship (DG/μ)av, while the shell-and-tube heat exchanger, especially on the shell side, exhibits more fluctuating pressure drop variations due to the complexity of the internal flow pattern. These findings indicate that the geometric configuration of the heat exchanger has a significant influence on the hydrodynamic response under laboratory-scale operating conditions.

Keywords:

Heat Exchanger, Shell and Tube, Double-Pipe, Pressure Drop, Flow Rate.

 

 

Full Text:

PDF

References

[1] A. T. Wahyudi, F. Leestiana, and R. Widodo, “Evaluasi kinerja Heat Exchanger pada Fasilitas Kilang PPSDM Migas dengan Metode Perhitungan Fouling Factor,” 2022.

[2] R. Shanahan, J. T. Kimia, P. N. Malang, J. Soekarno, dan H. No, “Studi Literatur Tentang Efektivitas Alat Penukar Panas Shell And Tube 1-1 Sistem Fluida Gliserin –,” vol. 6, no. 9, hal. 164–170, 2020.

[3] H. L. Amrullah and C. I. Walhawanadana, “Artikel Efisiensi Heat Exchanger ( HE-002 ) Pada Crude Distillation Unit di Pusat Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Minyak dan Gas Bumi ( PPSDM Migas ),” hal. 23–28, 2022.

[4] H. Jouhara, N. Khordehgah, S. Almahmoud, B. Delpech, A. Chauhan, and S. A. Tassou, “Waste heat recovery technologies and applications,” Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog., vol. 6, no. January, hal. 268–289, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tsep.2018.04.017.

[5] D. Ivananda et al., “Analisis Koefisien Perpindahan Panas Alat Double Pipe Heat Exchanger Berbasis Computational Fluid Dynamics,” vol. 9, no. 9, hal. 240–250, 2023.

[6] A. G. Arumsari and P. J. Ginting, “Analysis of Heat Transfer Coefficient of Shell and Tube on Heat Exchanger Using Heat Transfer Research Inch ( HTRI ) Software,” vol. 2, no. 5, hal. 1175–1184, 2023.

[7] Cuneyt Ezgi and Ozgur Akyol, “Thermal Design of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger Used as an Oil Cooler in Ships : A Comparative Case Study,” J. Sh. Prod. Des., vol. 35, no. 1, hal. 12–18, 2019.

[8] M. H. and M. R. T. M. Akhtari, “Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Heat Transfer of α-Al2O3/ Water Nanofluid in Double Pipe and Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers M.,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part A Appl. An Int. J. Comput. Methodol., no. May, hal. 37–41, 2013, doi: 10.1080/10407782.2013.772855.

[9] P. Rahmadhani, E. Naryono, and B. Andy, “Analisis Kinerja Heat Exchanger Pada Lube Oil Complex Iii ( Loc Iii ) Berdasarkan Fouling Factor Dan Pressure Drop Pt . Pertamina Ru-Iv Cilacap,” vol. 11, no. 9, hal. 151–165, 2025.

[10] M. Hidayatulloh,. “Pengaruh Fouling Factor Terhadap Performa Heat Exchanger Tipe Shell and Tube,” vol. 8, no. 1, 2022.

[11] M. Assabil and A. Chalim, “Pertukaran Panas Dalam Shell And Tube Heat Exchanger,” vol. 10, no. 9, hal. 664–673, 2024.

[12] B. Pramudono. "Operasi Teknik Kimia Heat Exchanger". 2022.

[13] B. R. Husda, “Pengaruh Variasi Kecepatan Aliran Fluida Terhadap Tekanan Pada Bangun Ruang Lingkaran Di Ruang Uji Wind Tunnel,” Patria Artha Technol. J., vol. 7, no. 1, hal. 117–121, 2023, doi: 10.33857/patj.v7i1.707.

[14] A. Husen, T. M. I. Akbar, and N. Cholis, “Analisis Pengaruh Kecepatan Aliran Fluida Dingin,” Bina Tek., vol. 16, no. Vc, hal. 1–10, 2020.

[15] D. Pratama, K. Hadiningrum, and R. Fenny, “Studi Awal Pengaruh Temperatur terhadap Karakteristik Aliran Fluida Pada Belokan Pipa 90 0 melalui Simulasi,” vol. 11, no. 2, hal. 68–71, 2019.

[16] A. Hafeez et al., “Analysis of Flow-Induced Vibrations in a Heat Exchanger Tube Bundle Subjected to Variable Tube Flow Velocity,” vol. 17, no. 2, hal. 279–288, 2023.

[17] M. Davoodianidalik, H. Punzmann, H. Kellay, H. Xia, M. Shats, and N. Francois, “Fluctuation-Induced Interaction in Turbulent Flows Fluctuation-Induced Interaction in Turbulent Flows,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 128, no. 2, hal. 24503, 2022, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.024503.

[18] H. J. Ruijie Zhang, Fangfang Tao, H. Jin, S. orgGoogl. Scholar, and Q. G. andSuohe Y. *ORCID, Xiaoyan Guo, Guangxiang He, Lei Ma, Rongyue Zhang, “Effect of Liquid Properties on Frictional Pressure Drop in a,” Processes, 2022.

[19] K. G. Harding, “Fluid flow,” no. August, 2018.

[20] I. Saiful Akmal, Nasrul Za, “Analisa Profil Aliran Fluida Cair Dan Pressure Drop Pada Pipa L Menggunakan Metode Simulasi Computational,” J. Teknol. Kim. Unimal, vol. 1, no. Mei, hal. 97–108, 2019.

[21] J. Sundin, U. Ciri, S. Leonardi, and M. Hultmark, “Heat transfer increase by convection in liquid-infused surfaces for laminar and turbulent flows,” hal. 1–23, 2022, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2022.279.

[22] T. H. Ariwibowo, P. D. Permatasari, N. Ardhiyangga, and S. Triyono, “Studi Eksperimen Karakteristik Shell-And-Tube Heat Exchanger Dengan Variasi Jenis Baffle Dan Jarak Antar Baffle,” J. Ilmu Fis. | Univ. Andalas, vol. 8, no. 2, hal. 87–97, 2017, doi: 10.25077/jif.8.2.87-97.2016.

[23] A. Adhitiya, “Simulasi Performansi Heat Exchanger Type Shell And Tube Dengan Double Segmental Baffle Terhadap Helical Baffle,” vol. 2, no. 3, 2013.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.