Pengaruh Project Based Learning disertai Know Want Learn Chart terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Fluency, Flexibility, dan Originality Peserta Didik Biologi SMA Kelas X

Gardena Smoro Laksmi, Riezky Maya Probosari, Alanindra Saputra, Dewi Widowati




One of the goals of 21st century education is  forming creative students. Based on a survey of Global Creativity Index in 2015, creative thinking level of Indonesian students is low, which is ranked 86th out of 93 countries. Project Based Learning (PjBL) is learning model that is proven to be able to improve students' creative thinking skills but often requires a long duration. KWL Chart function is controling the learning process to be systematic and effective because the tasks performed by students become focus so that it can cover the shortcomings of PjBL. The distribution of values in the PjBL class with the KWL chart (experiment 1) and the PjBL class only (experiment 2) are more diffuse than the control class, it can be seen that the pretest as a covariate has less significance than the significance level of 0.05 which is equal to 0,000. It is stated that the pretest value and the posttest value are linear. There are other aspects outside of research that influence students' creative thinking skills. The obtained Squared R value is 0.560, it means that the difference in model and media integration given in the control class, experiment 1, and experiment 2 only affects 56% of students' creative thinking skills. Other factors outside of research that affect students' creative thinking skills are as much as 44%, even though the time needed for the experiment 1 class is shorter than the experimental class 2.


PjBL; KWL Chart; creative thinking

Full Text:



Bentley, T. (2006). Can We Be More Creative in Thinking About How To Scale Up Educational Innovation? Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 339–344.

Dallman, S., Nguyen, L., Lamp, J., & Cybulski, J. (2005). Contextual factors which influence creativity in requirements engineering. ECIS 2005 Proceedings, (January), 1734–1745. Retrieved from http://20050151.pdf

Dewi, I. A. G. B. P., & Indrawati, K. R. (2014). Perilaku Mencatat dan Kemampuan Memori pada Proses Belajar. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana, 1(2), 241–250.

Grant, M. M. (2009). Understanding Projects in Project-based Learning : A Student ’ s Perspective, (2005), 1–21.

Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three Faces of Intellect. American Psychologist, 14(8), 469–479.

Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. (2015). The Global Creativity Index 2015. Martin Prosperity Institute, 68. Retrieved from

Freeman, G., & Smith, J. Q. (2011). Bayesian MAP model selection of chain event graphs. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 102(7), 1152–1165.

Isabekov, A., & Sadyrova, G. (2018). Project-Based Learning to Develop Creative Abilities in Students, 43–49.

Kumar, K. S., & Akoijam, B. S. (2017). Assessment of Perception and Effectiveness of Concept Mapping in Learning Epidemiology. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 43(February), 94–96.

Noviyana, H. (2017). Pengaruh Model Project BASED Learning Terhadap kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Matematika Siswa. Edumath, 3(2), 110–116.

Purnama, H. S., & Arifin, Z. (2017). Using Computer Based Instruction Tutorial Model with Video Tutorial to Increase The Ability of Creative Thinking By Student, 3(1), 41–51.

Putri, E. F., Jamiah, Y., & T., A. Y. (2017). Strategi Know-Want-Learn Berstruktur Multirepresentasi untuk Mengaktifkan Pengetahuan Awal Dalam Materi Aljabar, 6(10), 1–9.

Rahmazatullaili, Zubainur, C. M., & Munzir, S. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Project Besed Learning. Beta Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 10(2), 8–13.

Silver, E. (1997). Fostering Creativity Through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing.

Sudarisman, S. (2015). Memahami hakikat dan karakteristik pembelajaran biologi dalam upaya menjawab tantangan abad 21 serta optimalisasi implementasi kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Florea, 2(1), 29–35.

Susilowati, E. B., & Purnama, B. E. (2011). Analisis Dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi Pasien Rumah Sakit Umum Nirmala Suri Sukoharjo. Speed Sentra Penelitian Engineering Dan Edukasii, 3(4), 10–17.

Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives, 43.

Treffinger, D. J., Feldhusen, J. F., & Bahlke, S. J. (1970). Developing Creative Thinking: The Purdue Creativity Program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 4(2), 85–90.

Trostle, S. L., & Yawkey, T. D. (1982). Creative thinking and the education of young children : the fourth basic skill, 14(2), 67–71.

Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Lewis, D. J. (1954). Hypotheses and Tests for This Study, 19(4).

Yuniati, S. (2013). Peta Konsep ( Mind Mapping ) Dalam Pembelajaran. Gamatika, III(2), 129–139.

Zouhor, Z., Bogdanović, I., & Segedinac, M. (2016). Effects of the Know-Want-Learn Strategy on Primary School Students ’ Metacognition and Physics Achievement. Journal of Subject Didactics, 1(1), 39–49.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi

BIOEDUKASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi

Print p-ISSN: 1693-265X
Online ISSN: 2549-0605
Published by: Department of Biology Education,Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.