Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik SMA Negeri Mata Pelajaran Biologi Kelas X

Taufiq Satria Mukti, Edi Istiyono


Research development is done by quantitative approach that aims to: (1) Generate tools for the assessment of critical thinking ability; (2) Describe the quality of instruments developed to measure critical thinking skills. The study population is the XIP MIPA class of fourteen SMAN in Kendal District. The sample of the research was determined using purposive sampling technique which represented the school with high, medium, and low ranking criteria. Trial conducted on 201 learners. The test instrument was developed with a reasonable multiple choice form. Four categories of scores on each item correspond to the scoring of the PCM (Partial Credit Model) politomus model. Research data were analyzed using the help of EXCEL application, SPSS 16, QUEST and PARSCALE. The results showed that: (1) The critical thinking test instrument fulfilled the validity of the content of the expert judgment; (2) The test instrument with four categories of fit scores on the PCM model; (3) The test instrument has a high reliability value; (4) The test instrument has good difficulty level criteria; (5) Test instruments can be used to estimate critical thinking skills.


Critical Thinking, Biology Grade X, Politomus Scoring, Partial Credit Model, Multiple Choice Grounded

Full Text:



Adams, R.J dan Khoo, S.T. (1996). Quest : The interactive test analysis system version 2.1. Victoria: The Australian Council for Educational Research.

Akbar, M.N, Firman, H and Rusyati, L. 2017. Developing Science Virtual Test to Measure Students’ Critical Thinking on Living Things and Environmental Sustainability Theme. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics.

Anisa. Aries. 2017. Meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik melalui pembelajaran ipa berbasis potensi lokal jepara. Yogyakarta : UNY/Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA.

Ennis, 1986. A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44-48.

Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J.S Long (Eds), Testing Structural Equatin Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136-162 (Electronic Version).

Hambleton, Ronald K. 1991. Fundamentals Of Item Respon Theory. London : New Dehli.

Hartini dan Sukardjo. 2015. Pengembangan Higher Order Thinking Multiple Choice Test Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis IPA Kelas VII SMP/MTS. Yogyakarta : UNY/Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA.

Huber, C.H and Kuncel, N. R. 2016. Does College Teach Critical Thinking? A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research June, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 431 –468.

Istiyono, Edy. 2013. Pengukuran Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika Peserta Didik SMA di DIY. UNY.

Lane, David and Oswald, Frederick L. 2016. Do 45% of College Students Lack Critical Thinking Skills? Revisiting a Central Conclusion of Academically Adrif. Educational Measurement :Issues and Practice Fall, Vol.35, No.3, pp.23–25.

McPeck, J. 1981. Critical Thinking And Education. New York: St. Martin's.

Mardapi, Djemari. 2016. Pengukuran, Penialian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta : Nuha Medika. Hlm : 12

Moore, Betsy and Stanley, Tood. 2010. Critical Thinking and formative assesment: increasing the rugor in your classromm. Eye Education .

Palm, Torulf. 2008. Performance Assessment and Authentic Assessment: A Conceptual Analysis of the Literature. Practical Assesment, Research & Evaluation. Volume 13, Number 4.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Tahun 2016 Nomor 23 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan

Retnawati, Heri. 2014. Teori Respon Butir dan Penerapannya.Yogyakarta : Parama Publishing Hlm. 32-34.

Stephen P. 1988. Controlling for background belief when developing Multiple-choice CT Test. Educational Measurement : Issues and Practice, Fall.

Sudjana, Nana. 2013. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Hlm. .3

Travis, T. York. 2015. Defining And Measuring Academic Succes. The Pennsylvania State University. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, Vol 20, No 5.

Towle, A. 1989. Modern Biology. Austin: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Hibbard, K.M. t.t. Performance Assessment in The Science Classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies. Hlm 16-31

Wilson, Suzanne M and Peterson, Penelope L. 2006. Theories of Learning and Teaching What Do They Mean for Educators?. National Education Association. USA : Washington, DC.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi

BIOEDUKASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi

Print p-ISSN: 1693-265X
Online ISSN: 2549-0605
Published by: Department of Biology Education,Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta