Pengaruh model pembelajaran multiliterasi terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis ditinjau dari self regulated learning mahasiswa

Milenia Suci Rachmawati, Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo, Roy Ardiansyah

Abstract

As a teacher candidate, it is important for a student to master the 21st century skills, namely the 4C. Critical thinking is one of the directions of 21st century education. As prospective educators, students need to master critical thinking skills which are supported by good self-regulated learning as a provision so that later they are able to conduct meaningful learning in class. This study aims to determine the effect of applying the multiliteracy learning model on students' critical thinking skills in terms of the students' self-regulated learning. The type of research method used is a quantitative experiment with a 2 x 3 factorial design. Based on the results of hypothesis testing using the two-way ANOVA test with different cells, the results are Fobs > Fα  with details, namely Fa > Fα (18,03901 > 3,986269479), Fb > Fα (27,5862 > 3,135917934), and Fab > Fα(139,2992 > 3,135917934). Referring to these results, it can be seen that the multiliteracy learning model has an effect on students' critical thinking skills, self-regulated learning has an effect on students' critical thinking skills, and there is an interaction between the multiliteracy learning model and the level of self-regulated learning on critical thinking skills.

Keywords

multiliteracy learning models, critical thinking skills, self regulated learning, and students

Full Text:

PDF

References

S. Hadi dan Novaliyosi, “TIMSS INDONESIA ( TRENDS IN INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE STUDY ),” 2019, p. 562–569.

Nizam, “Ringkasan Hasil-hasil Asesmen Belajar dari Hasil UN, Pisa, TIMSS, INAP.” Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Kemendikbud, 2016.

I. V. S. Mullis, M. O. Martin, P. Foy, D. L. Kelly, dan B. Fishbein, “TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science,” 2019.

OECD, PISA 2018 Results (Volume I) What Students Know and Can Do, vol. I. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.

R. A. Nugroho, HOTS. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2021.

Sundahry, Y. Fitria, dan R. Rakimahwati, “Pengaruh Strategi Reciprocal Teaching Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas V SD,” EduHumaniora | J. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1, 2019, doi: 10.17509/eh.v11i1.9766.

A. Fisher, “Berpikir Kritis Sebuah Pengantar,” Jakarta: Erlangga, 2009.

R. Hidayanti, Alimuddin, dan A. A. Syahri’, “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gender Pada Siswa Kelas VII.1 Smp Negeri 2 Labakkang,” SIGMA (Suara Intelekt. Gaya Mat., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 71–80, 2020.

Y. Fitria, “Penguatan Pengajaran Guru Sains Level Dasar dengan Strategi Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Literasi Sains,” 2016.

D. T. Tempelaar, “The role of metacognition in business education,” Ind. High. Educ., vol. 20, no. 5, p. 291–297, 2006.

S. Schafersman, “AN INTRODUCTION TO CRITICAL THINKING.” 1991, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://www.freeinquiry.com/critical-thinking.html.

J. Clement, “Introduction to research in cognitive process instruction.” 1979.

D. A. Norman, Perspectives on Cognitive Science. Hillsdale: NJ:Erlbaum, 1981.

R. Hidayah, M. Salimi, dan T. S. Susiani, “CRITICAL THINKING SKILL: KONSEP DAN INDIKATOR PENILAIAN,” J. Taman Cendekia, vol. 01, no. 02, p. 127–133, 2017, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: http://clpsy.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_3887.html.

T. Wiyoko, “Analisis Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa PGSD Dengan Graded Response Models Pada Pembelajaran IPA,” Indones. J. Sci. Educ. (Ijis Edu), vol. 1, no. 1, p. 25–32, 2019.

F. P. H. Sari, I. R. W. Atmojo, dan R. Ardiansyah, “Pengaruh problem based learning berbantuan video animasi terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis pada pembelajaran ipa kelas V SD se-kecamatan laweyan,” JPIJurnal Pendidik. Indones. J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 4, p. 1–6, 2022.

B. Nadeak, C. P. Juwita, dan E. Sormin, “Hubungan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa dengan Penggunaan Media Sosial Terhadap Capaian Pembelajaran pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” J. Konseling dan Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 98–104, 2020, doi: 10.29210/146600.

C. T. Rosidah, “Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berbasis Multiliterasi Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis,” PINUS J. Penelit. Inov. Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 38–43, 2018, doi: 10.29407/pn.v4i1.12368.

J. Jaenudin, W. D. Puspitasari, dan U. Cahyaningsih, “Penerapan Model Multiliterasi Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman,” in Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, FKIP UNMA 2019 “Literasi Pendidikan Karakter Berwawasan Kearifan Lokal pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0,” 2019, p. 550–555.

H. Pamungkas dan A. F. Prakoso, “Self-Regulated Learning Bagi Mahasiswa: Pentingkah?,” J. Pendidik. Ekon., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 69–75, 2020, doi: 10.17977/um014v13i12020p069.

S. B. Ratu, E. S. Taunu, dan M. E. Nggaba, “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Kristen Payeti dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita pada Materi Persamaan Linear Satu Variabel Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Auditorial,” Satya Widya, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 132–140, 2021, doi: 10.24246/j.sw.2021.v37.i2.p132-140.

Budiyono, Pengantar Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Surakarta: UNS Press, 2020.

S. Anwar, “PENGARUH PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN SELF REGULATED LEARNING TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN MATEMATIS,” GeoMath, vol. I, no. 1, p. 54–67, 2020.

Suwarto, “Pengembangan The Two-Tier Diagnostic Tests pada Bidang Biologi secara Terkomputerisasi,” J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 206–224, 2010.

F. Rosyada, K. I. Supardi, K. Kasmui, dan N. Sriwijayanti, “Desain Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier Untuk Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Kelarutan Dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 15, no. 2, p. 2873–2884, 2021, doi: 10.15294/jipk.v15i2.15878.

R. H. Ristanto, M. Miarsyah, dan K. Ekosistem, “Two-Tier Test : Development of Critical Thinking Instruments for Ecosystem Concepts Two-tier Test : Pengembangan Instrumen Berpikir Kritis,” vol. 12, no. 1, p. 48–62, 2022.

B. A. Pratama, B. Subali, dan P. Dwijananti, “Developing Two-Tier Essay for Diagnostic Test Instrument to Identify Student Learning Difficulty,” Sci. Educ. J. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 117–128, 2018, doi: 10.24235/sc.educatia.v7i2.2683.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v11i4.77593

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.