Analisis butir soal dengan AnBuSo pada penilaian sumatif tengah semester genap mata pelajaran IPAS kelas IV SD
Abstract
Accurate assessment of learning outcomes depends heavily on the quality of test instruments, but at the elementary school level, quantitative item analysis is often overlooked. This study aims to evaluate the empirical quality of Mid-Semester Summative Assessment (PSTS) items for Grade IV Science at Ta'mirul Islam Elementary School in Surakarta to ensure the instrument is capable of measuring student competency validly and reliably. The research method used is descriptive quantitative with a content analysis approach. Data were collected through a documentary study of the test scripts and answers from 36 students, which were then processed using AnBuSo and SPSS applications. The results showed that 56% of the test items were declared valid, but the instrument reliability level was relatively low (0.217–0.512) because they were dominated by easy category items (89%). In addition, 78% of the test items had poor discriminatory power, even though the distribution of cognitive levels included 35% of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). The implications of this study emphasize that qualitative validation alone is not sufficient to guarantee assessment quality; periodic psychometric analysis is needed to improve the effectiveness of distractors and the balance of item difficulty levels. These findings recommend the use of simple software such as AnBuSo for teachers to conduct more precise diagnostic evaluations, so that the assessment results can reflect students' scientific abilities objectively and support continuous learning improvement.
Keywords
References
Ait-hroch, A., Gazi, S. El, & Ibrahimi, A. (2025). The constructive alignment of objectives , tasks , and assessment in hybrid language training. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences. https://doi.org/https://10.30574/wjaets
Anwar, Z., Masrifatin, Y., & Rahmania, N. (2024). Analisis Butir Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester MI Menggunakan Rasch Model. 2(2), 151–161.
Arifin, Z. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama RI.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi revisi). Rineka Cita.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education.
Basri, K., Baidowi, B., Junaidi, J., & Turmuzi, M. (2021). Analisis Butir Soal Ulangan Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas VIII SMP. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 1(4), 682–694. https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v1i4.107
Biggs, J., & Biggs, J. (2013). John Biggs. Medical Education, 33(8), 624–625. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00431.x
Budiyono. (2023). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Surakarta: UNSPRESS.
Bujuri, D. A. (2018). Analisis Perkembangan Kognitif Anak Usia Dasar dan Implikasinya dalam Kegiatan Belajar Mengajar. LITERASI (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan), 9(1), 37-50. https://doi:10.21927
Fadila, F., & Fitriyeni. (2024). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka pada Pembelajaran IPAS di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(4), 4357–4366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v7i5.5766
Fitrianawati, M. (2015). Peran Analisis Butir Soal Guna Meningkatkan Kualitas Butir Soal, Kompetensi Guru Dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan PGSD UMS & HDPGSDI Wilayah Jawa, 5(3), 282–295.
Hariati, B. S., Hakim, L., Pratiwi, V., & Ayu, R. C. (2026). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Elemen Dokumen Berbasis Digital Menggunakan ANATES. Jurnal Jendela Pendidikan, 6(01), 46–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57008/jjp.v6i01.1956
Karomah, A. K., Istiyati, S., & Surya, A. (2022). Analisis tingkat kognitif soal pada buku matematika kelas IV kurikulum merdeka. Didaktika Dwija Indria, 201–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/jpiuns.v9i4.82137
Luna, C. (2015). Education Research And Foresight What Kind Of Learning. 1–14.
Magdalena, I., Nurchayati, A., Suhirman, D. P., Fathya, N. N., & Tangerang, U. M. (2023). Implementasi Teori Pengembangan Kognitif Jean Piaget Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Di Sekolah Dasar. ANWARUL Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Dakwah, 3, 960–969. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.58578/anwarul.v3i5.1431
Muhson, A. (2017). Panduan Penggunaan AnBuso 2017. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika, 21(2), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i2.29252
Nasaruddin, W. R. (2026). Analisis Penilaian Proses Dan Hasil Belajar Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Abad Ke-21. Kreatif, 24, 169–180. https://doi.org/https://10.21831/pep.v18i2.2481
Nouraey, P., Al-Badi, A., Riasati, M. J., & Maata, R. L. (2020). Educational Program and Curriculum Evaluation Models: A Mini Systematic Review of the Recent Trends. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 4048–4055. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080930
Nursobah, A. (2017). Perencanaan Pembelajaran MI/SD.Pamekasan : Duta Media Publishing.
Putri, E., & Fatmawati, L. (2024). Analysis of High Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ) in Objective Test Questions for Science Learning Material in Fourth Grade Elementary School. International Journal of Learning Reformation in Elementary Education, 3(03), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.56741/ijlree.v3i03.624
Rahayu, R., & Djazari, M. (2016). Analisis Kualitas Soal Pra Ujian Nasional Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akutansi Indonesia, 0–2.
Rohma, S. N. (2023). Analisis butir dan level kognitif pada soal penilaian tengah semester gasal mata pelajaran bahasa indonesia kelas iv sekolah dasar. Didaktika Dwija Indria, 449. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v11i2.76111
Subandi, I. W., Atmojo, I. R. W., & Ardiansyah, R. (2024). Pengaruh case based learning terhadap hasil belajar kognitif mahasiswa ditinjau dari computational thinking. Didaktika Dwija Indria, 447–452. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/ddi.v13i3.93070
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukardi. (2017). Evaluasi Pendidikan (Prinsip dan Operasionalnya) (pp. 38–39). Bumi Aksara.
Sutinah, C., Mahardhika, R. L., & Kartini, D. (2025). Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam dan Sosial ( IPAS ) Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam dan Sosial ( IPAS ) Fase B dan C. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah Republik Indonesia.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
