Should Indonesia Learn from Malaysia and Singapore’s Cross-Border Insolvency Asset Settlements?

Tata Wijayanta, Sheva Trisanda Adistia, Rado F Leonardus, B.E Hermawan

Abstract

The lack of boundaries between countries characterises the current globalisation. This convenience represents "high risk, high return", with the possibility of greater profits, but there is also a high risk of failure. This risk arises due to unpreparedness to mitigate the consequences of using technology or errors in its application, resulting in bankruptcy and affecting business actors and all assets. In Indonesia, the regulation of the cross-border insolvency mechanism still needs to be clarified, especially for cross-border assets that experienced difficulties in execution. This study examined Malaysia and Singapore's cross-border insolvency asset settlement arrangements as the closest countries to Indonesia. The study shows that Malaysia and Singapore have agreements with other countries formed as a collaborative step for settling bankruptcy cases. Indonesia is required to modify the principle of territorialism, either by forming bilateral or multilateral agreements, even by ratifying the UNCITRAL Cross-Border-Insolvency.

Keywords

Indonesian Bankruptcy Law; Bankruptcy Assets; Cross Border Insolvenc

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adhitya, R. (2021). Analisis Pembentukan Asean Cross Border Insolvency Regulation Sebagai Solusi Permasalahan Kepailitan Lintas Batas di Asean. Kepastian Hukum & Keadilan , 32-42.

Amalia, J. (2019). Urgensi Implementasi UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency di Indonesia: Studi Komparasi Hukum Kepailitan Lintas Batas Indonesia Dan Singapura. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 2(2), 162–172.

Anderson, K. (2000). The Cross-Border Insolvency Paradigm: A Defense of the Modified Universal Approach Considering the Japanese Experience. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 21(4), 679–779. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jil/vol21/iss4/1.

Asmara, T. P. T., Ikhwansyah, I., & Afriana, A. (2019). Ease of Doing Business: Gagasan Pembaruan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Investasi di Indonesia. Bengkulu Law Journal, 4(2), 118–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.4.2.125-143

Aziz, S. N. A., & Basir, S. M. (2017). Perbezaan Rejim Polisi Pelaburan Langsung Asing (FDI) Dalam Kalangan Negara Anggota ASEAN: Cabaran Perundangan Dalam Merealisasikan Komuniti Ekonomi ASEAN Berdasarkan ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement (ACIA). Jurnal Undang-Undang Dan Masyarakat, 2017(S), 1–16.

Casey, A. J., & Macey, J. C. (2022). The Bankruptcy Tribunal. Forthcoming American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 965, 1–21. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4261467

Chen, Q., & Taylor, D. (2020). Economic development and pollution emissions in Singapore: Evidence in support of the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis and its implications for regional sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118637

Dewi, P. E. T. (2021). The Cross-Border Insolvency in Executing Bankrupt Assets Outside Indonesian Jurisdiction: A Comparative Study with Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines. IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 5(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v5i1.64157

Djaya, I., & Utami, V. (2021, May 12). Legal Issue in the Matter of Cross-Border Insolvency in Indonesia Based on Law No. 37 Of 2004 on the Insolvency and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligation. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-3-2021.2306397

Ganindha, R., & Indira, N. P. (2020). Kewenangan Kurator dalam Eksekusi Aset Debitor pada Kepailitan Lintas Batas Negara. Arena Hukum, 13(2), 329–347. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2020.01302.8

Ginting, S. A. P. (2020). An Overview Of The Immediate Execution Of Amar Decisions (Uitvoebaar Bij Voorad ) In Civil Cases in The Kabanjahe State Court. Journal of Law Science, 2(3), 97–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v2i3.1626.

Hanim, L. (2011). Pengaruh perkembangan teknologi informasi terhadap keabsahan perjanjian dalam perdagangan secara elektronik (e-commerce) di era globalisasi. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11, 56–66. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.Edsus.262

Haq, M. B. A., & Wijayanta, T. (2020). Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings: A Comparative Study between the Laws of Indonesia and South Korea. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. , 14(12), 715–729. www.ijicc.net

Harahap, M. Y. (2009). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Sinar Grafika.

Hardjaloka, L. (2015). Kepailitan Lintas Bata Perspektif Hukum Internasional dan Perbandingannya dengan Instrumen Nasional di Beberapa Negara. Yuridika, 30(3), 480–504. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v30i3.1952

Ho, L. C. (2014). The Revised UNCITRAL Model Law Enactment Guide-A Welcome Product? Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, 325(6), 325–340. http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/insolvency/1997Model.html

Lipsey, R. E., & Sjöholm, F. (2011). Foreign direct investment and growth in East Asia: Lessons for Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 47(1), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2011.556055

Maulidya, N. A. D., Turisno, B. E., & Badriyah, S. M. (2023). History of Legal System and Sources of Law in Force in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 5(2), 34–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2023.5.2.4.

Maya Rosmayanti, & Rani Apriani. (2023). Kedudukan Penanaman Modal Asing Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Nasional Berdasarkan Hukum Investasi. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v8i1.8500

Milcheva, S. (2022). Volatility and the Cross-Section of Real Estate Equity Returns during Covid-19. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 65(2), 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-021-09840-6

Mohan, S. C. (2012). Cross-border Insolvency Problems: Is the UNCITRAL Model Law the Answer? International Insolvency Review, 21(3), 199–223. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sol_research/1145

Nasution, S. N., Suhaidi, Harianto, D., & Leviza, J. (2022). Standar Nasional Indonesia Terhadap Produk Barang dalam Kerangka Perdagangan Bebas World Trade Oraganization (Wto) dan Asean-China Free Trade Agreement (ACFTA). Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 1(2), 294–312.

Putri, L. E. (2023). Pengaruh E-Commerce Terhadap Perkembangan Usaha Di Indonesia. Tafidu Jurnal, 2(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.57113/jtf.v2i1.269

Sarda, R., & Annam, S. (2022). The Need for a Robust Legal Framework for Cross Border Insolvencies in India. Commonwealth Law Review Journal, 8, 1–19.

Sefriani, Sefriani. (2019). Ineffectiveness Of The Law on Cross Insolvensi Uncitral Model. Yustisia, Vol. 8 (1), https://dx.doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v8i1.27858

Sufiarina, S. (2019). Buah Simalakama Pengaturan Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan Terhadap Penyelesaian Kepailitan Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 5(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v5i1.88.

Sujayadi, S., Wijayanta, T., & Herliana, H. (2023a). ACTOR SEQUITUR FORUM REI: A THEORITICAL STUDY. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i2.896

Sujayadi, S., Wijayanta, T., & Herliana, H. (2023b). Regulating Court Jurisdiction to Protect Weaker Parties: An Overview of the Indonesian Civil Justice System. Yuridika, 38(2), 305–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i2.43835

Suteki, & Taufani, G. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori, dan Praktik). Surabaya: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tirayo, A. M., & Halim, Y. (2019). Problematik Definisi Harta Pailit untuk Mencapai Kepastian Hukum dalam Pelaksanaan Kepailitan dan PKPU. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 6(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2963

Wijayanta, T. (2015). Undang Undang dan Praktik Kepailitan: Perbandingan Indonesia dan Malaysia. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Wijayanta, T., & AH, M. B. (2021). Cross border insolvency, kerja sama lintas batas antar lembaga peradilan: Perbandingan Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Korea Selatan. Gadjah Mada University Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v13i1.79773

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.