Cartel Indications on Determination of Loan Interest Rate in Fintech Lending

Sukarmi Sukarmi, Ranitya Ganindha, Reka Dewantara

Abstract

The application of information technology platforms that appear in business transactions in Indonesia is a pattern of business models that cannot be avoided. One of the rapidly growing technology companies is an online loan service.The ease of borrowing funds through these services supports business growth. In contrast to the banking sector, which is regulated by a series of strict government regulations and the determination of interest rates that have been determined by looking at economic conditions. The absence of regulation in the legislation makes AFPI set the limit for determining the maximum interest rate, but the determination of interest rates by AFPI is suspected to lead to cartel actions. There is a close relationship between fair business competition and consumer protection. This research is a normative juridical research with a statutory approach and a comparative approach. In this case, the setting of interest rate limits will reduce consumers’ rights to get competitive prices. The existence of conscious parallelism by the AFPI on the LPMUBTI services can be categorized as a price fixing agreement. It is because the determination of the maximum interest rate limit is not regulated through direct government regulations.

Keywords

Cartel, Financial Technology, Peer to Peer Landing, Association

Full Text:

PDF

References

Astuti Lila Ayu Desak, A.A Ngurah Wirasila, 2019, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Transaksi E-commerce Dalam Hal Terjadinya Kerugian, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 6(2), 1-15.

Candrika Radita Putri. (2018). Tanggung Gugat Penyelenggara Peer To Peer Lending Jika Penerima Pinjaman Melakukan Wanprestasi. Jurnal Jurist- Diction, 1(2), 460–475.

Hartanto, R. dan Ramli J.P. (2018). Hubungan Hukum Para Pihak dalam Peer to Peer Lending. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(2), 320–338.

Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Establishment of Legislation.

Law Number 21 of 2011 on the Financial Services Authority.

Law Number 40 of 2007 on the Limited Liability Companies.

Law Number 5 of 1999 on the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3 of 2004 on the Amendments to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 1999 on the Bank Indonesia.

Lubis, A. F. (2009). Hukum Persaingan Usaha Antara Teks dan Konteks. ROV Creative Media.

Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi (13th ed.). Kencana.

Muchlis, R. (2018). Analisis SWOT Financial Technology (Fintech) Pembiayaan Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia (Studi Kasus 4 Bank Syariah di Kota Medan). Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 1(1), 335-357.

Nugroho, S. A. (2012). Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia Dalam Teori dan Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Kencana.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2019). Perkembangan Fintech Lending (Pendanaan Gotong Royong on-Line). https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/ iknb/data-dan-statistik/fintech/Pages/Statistik-Fintech-Lending-Periode- Juli-2019.aspx

Putra, Komang Satria Wibawa dan I Nyoman Budiana. (2019). Perjanjian Kredit Melalui Financial Tecnology Dalam Lalu Lintas Hukum Bisnis. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 2(1), 73–92.

Rachmadi Usman. (2013). Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Regulation of the Bank Indonesia Number 19/12/PBI/2017 on the Implementation of Financial Technology.

Regulation of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Number 3 of 1999.

Regulation of the Business Competition Supervisory Commission Number 4 of 2011 on the Guidelines.

Regulation of the Financial Services Authority Number 77/POJK.01/2016 on the Information Technology-Based Borrowing-Lending Services.

Roy Franedya. (2019). Fintech Patok Bunga 0,4%/Hari, KPPU Selidiki Potensi Kartel. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20190827061346-37-%0A94923/fintech-patok-bunga-08-hari-kppu-selidiki-potensi-kartel%0A

Trinugroho, I., Nugroho, A. A., Harmadi, H., Suyono, J., Juan, M., & Toro, S. (2017). Households, Financial Distress, and Predatory Lending: an Experimental Study. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 21(3), 473-480.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.