Integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector: Dispute Resolution Efforts in Consumer Protection Framework

Lastuti Abubakar, Tri Handayani

Abstract

This study examines and analyzes the legal implications of strengthening the integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector regulations. This study applies a normative juridical approach with descriptive-analytical research specifications. The data are analyzed using qualitative juridical analysis. Results show that: an Integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector is a dispute resolution institution that is in accordance with the characteristics of the financial services sector as an agent of trust and prioritizes consumer protection. It is expected that consumer dispute resolution is faster, cheaper, and fairer for both Business Actors and the consumers; strengthening of regulations on integrated ADR Institutions in the Financial Services Sector aims to create independent, fair, effective, and efficient dispute resolution capable of anticipating developments in the financial services sector that are increasingly complex from a legal perspective, the use of financial technology, and products/services across financial services sectors

Keywords

Integrated Alternative Dispute Resolution; Financial Services Sector; Consumer Protectio

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abubakar, L. (2013). Revitalisasi Hukum Adat Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Membangun Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(2), 319–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2013.13.2.213

Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2019). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM INVESTOR DI PASAR MODAL MELALUI FUNGSI PENJAMINAN PENYELESAIAN TRANSAKSI BURSA. Rechtidee, 14(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v14i1.5369

Aldlaigan, A. H., & Buttle, F. A. (2001). Consumer involvement in financial services: An empirical test of two measures. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19(6), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006022

Budnitz, M. E. (1994). Arbitration of disputes between consumers and financial institutions: a serious threat to consumer protection. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 10(2), 267–342.

Dahlan, N. K. (2018). Alternative Dispute Resolution for Islamic Finance in Malaysia. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005077

Kawiński, M. (2014). Pozasądowe rozstrzyganie sporów a ochrona konsumentów branży ubezpieczeniowej. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego We Wrocławiu. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2014.342.10

Komite Nasional Keuangan Syariah. (2018). Masterplan Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia 2019-2024. Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional/ Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.

Kriese, M., Abor, J. Y., & Agbloyor, E. (2019). Financial consumer protection and economic growth. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(5), 1060–1080. https://doi. org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2018-0229

Lumpkin, S. (2010). Consumer Protection and Financial Innovation: A Few Basic Propositions. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, 2010(1), 1–23.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2016). Tentang Daftar Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id/id/ berita-dan-kegiatan/pengumuman/Documents/DAFTAR LAPS.pdf

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021a). Bahaya Fintech P2PL Illegal. Jakarta. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/data-dan-statistik/direktori/fintech/ Documents/P2PL legal vs ilegal.pdf

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021b). Lampiran II -Daftar Fintech Peer To Peer lending Illegal September 2020. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/ siaran-pers/Documents/Pages/Siaran-Pers-Satgas-Waspada-Investasi-Tutup-126-Fintech-Lending-Ilegal-dan-32-Investasi-Tanpa-Izin-/Lampiran II P2P IlegalSeptember 2020.pdf

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Penjelasan Umum POJK No. 18/POJK.07/2018 Tentang Layanan Pengaduan Konsumen di Sektor Jasa Keuangan, (2018).

Poisto & Hamed Alavi (2016). Abuse of Dominant Market Position by Predatory Pricing; The Valio Case. Hasanuddin Law Review, 2(1), 24-37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1n1.212

PWC. (2019). Financial Services Technology 2020 and Beyond. Civil Engineering Magazine Archive, 89(1), 70–83.

Rahmawati, E., & Abubakar, L. (2019). PERANAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PASAR MODAL: SUATU TINJAUAN ATAS PERKARA PERDATA TERKAIT TRANSAKSI REPO. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 4(1), 130–149.

Rahmawati, E., & Mantili, R. (2016). Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Sektor Jasa Keuangan. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 3(2), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n2.a2

Rinaldi, A., & Fahamsyah, E. (2020). PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN SEKTOR JASA KEUANGAN ATAS PENYALAHGUNAAN DATA PRIBADI PADA APLIKASI KREDIT ONLINE. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 3(1), 964–987. https://doi.org/http:// dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v3i1.8935

Santillln-Salgado, R. J. (2015). Global Regulatory Changes to the Banking Industry after the Financial Crisis: Basel III. SSRN Electronic Journal, 11(2), 83–100. https://doi. org/10.2139/ssrn.2692045

Septyanun, N. R. R. H. (2020). Diseminasi Online Model Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Nasabah Perbankan Akibat Force Majeour Covid-19 di Kota Mataram. Community Engagement & Emergence Journal, 2(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.37385/ceej.v2i1.132

Service Advices Alliance. (2013). Why use ADR? Pros & cons. Retrieved from https://asauk.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Why-use-ADR.pdf

Wibowo, A. M., Sukarmi, S., & Hamidah, S. (2019). ANALISIS YURIDIS KEWENANGAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMBIAYAAN KONSUMEN DI INDONESIA. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v27i1.8957

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v10i1.48684

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.