LEGAL EFFORTS OF TAX MANDATORY OBJECTIVES ON TAX PROVISIONS (Study in the Regional Office of General Directorate of Taxation of South Jakarta I)

Andri Prasetyo Sumbaga, Paisal Halim, Syamsiah Badruddin, Saifullah Bombang, Hardianto Djanggih

Abstract

The focus of this study is on the resolution of objections raised by Taxpayers in the Regional Office of DGT South Jakarta I. The theory used in this study refers to the opinion of Adam Smith in his book Wealth of Nations which states that a good tax collection must fulfill equity and equality requirements, certainty , convenience of payment, and efficiency. This study uses a naturalistic and interpretive qualitative approach that focuses on the process of resolving taxpayers' objections to a tax assessment as a legal effort. Data collection is done through interviews and direct observation on the object of research. The results of interviews and observations prove that the resolution of the objections to the South Jakarta I DGT Regional Office has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of the applicable tax regulations. This was also reinforced by statements made by Taxpayers who filed objections to the Regional Office of DGT South Jakarta I. The settlement of objections was also carried out to fulfill the rights and justice of the Taxpayers even though the decisions issued differed from the wishes of the Taxpayer. Settlement of objections seen from the rhythm of the work is considered effective, but when viewed from the time of completion, there are several applications that can be completed near the deadline. This is due to the large number of application files for reduction or elimination of administrative sanctions that enter, thus affecting the time to settle complaints.

Keywords

Objection Settlement, Tax, Determination Letter

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku

Ibrahim. 2015. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Neuman, W. Lawrence. 2006. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and

Pandiangan, Liberti. 2008. Modernisasi dan Reformasi Pelayanan Perpajakan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Terbaru. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo

Patton, Michael. 2002. Qualitative Evaluation Method. California: SAGE Publications Inc..

Siagian, Sondang P. 1996. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Sukanto, Soerjono. 2004. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Jurnal

Achmad, Suranto, Pujiyono, “Harmonisasi Pengaturan Pajak Daerah Dalam Kerangka Desentralisasi Fiskal Dan Otonomi Daerah (Studi Kabupaten Sukoharjo, Kota Surakarta, Dan Kabupaten Karanganyar)”, Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2015.

Hadiyantina, Shinta, “Konseptualisasi Pengampunan Pajak Dalam Konteks Reformasi Hukum Pajak Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Arena Hukum, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2018.

Ismail, Tjip, “Peradilan Pajak dan Kepastian Hukum di tengah Globalisasi Ekonomi”, Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2010.

Pramono, Widyo, “Penyamaan Persepsi Dan Kerjasama Dalam Pemeriksaan Di Bidang Perpajakan Untuk Mendukung Optimalisasi Penerimaan Negara”, Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016.

Purnawan, Amin, “Rekonstruksi Sistem Pemungutan Pajak Penghasilan (Pph) Badan Berbasis Nilai Keadilan”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 11, Edisi Khusus, 2011.

Nursadi, Harsanto, “Tindakan Hukum Administrasi (Negara) Perpajakan Yang Dapat Berakibat Pada Tindakan Pidana”, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2018.

Rachmawati, Agung dan Sariono, Joko. 2011. “Upaya Hukum Wajib Pajak Atas Surat Ketetapan Pajak Kurang Bayar Yang Ditetapkan Oleh Fiskus Dalam Pemenuhan Hak Wajib Pajak”. Perspektif, Volume 14, No. 4, 2011.

Suhardi, “Penyatuan Hukum Pajak Formal Dalam Sistem Hukum Pajak Nasiona”, Yuridika, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2016.

Sulaiman, “Paradigma Dalam Penelitian Hukum Legal Research Paradigm”, Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 20, No. 2, 2018.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.