Students’ Lived Experience of Using Seesaw Class Application in English I Class

Paskalina Widiastuti Ratnaningsih

Abstract

This paper aims at discovering students’ lived experience in using Seesaw Class application in English I Class. Seesaw Class is an application for teaching-learning in the smartphone. Applications are used as the media for learning in the present era. Seesaw Class application is used to enhance English skills and components during teaching-learning activities. Various features in Seesaw Class application provide more space for students to express their ideas. The method used is a hermeneutic- phenomenology method. It focuses on the description and interpretation of lived experience. The data were gathered with in- depth interview, observation, and document review. The research was validated with triangulation. The research results are divided into empirical themes and transcendent themes. Meaning in each theme is revealed with deep understanding of the research and has the implication in the practice area. The concept discovered in this study is explained in a Venn diagram and has the implication in the theory area.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ozdamli, F. (2011). Pedagogical framework of m-learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, pp. 927-931.

Laanpere, M., Pata, K., Normak, P., & Poldoja, H. (2013). Pedagogy-driven Design of Digital Learning Ecosystems. Computer Science and Information Systems, 11 (1), pp. 419-442.

Sung, Y., Chang, K., Liu, T. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers and Education, 94, pp. 252-275

Chan, N.N., Walker, C., & Gleaves, A. (2015). An exploration of students’ lived experiences of using smartphones in diverse learning contexts using a hermeneutic phenomenological approach. Computers & Education, 82, pp. 96-106.

Hamilton, B.J. (2017). Seesaw: A Space for Sharing, Community Building, Feedback, and Formative Assessment.

Carter, R. & Nunan, D. (2001). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Colpaert, J. (2006). Pedagogy-driven Design for Online Language Teaching and Learning. CALICO Journal, 23 (3), pp.477-497.

Korucu, A.T. & Alkan, A. (2011). Differences between m-learning (mobile learning) and e-learning, basic terminology and usage of m-learning in education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1925-1930.

Schuck, S. (2015). Mobile Pedagogical Framework: a socio-cultural model for mobile learning. Educational Technologies: Now and in the Future.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

Haller, B.C. (2014). Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives in Ecology and Evolution: A Survey. BioScience, 64, pp.907-916.

Chen, C. (1972). Aristotle and Plato’s Theory of Transcendent Ideas. The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter.

Van Mannen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Canada: The University of Western Ontario

Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.