THE POLITENESS OF DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACTS IN SATU JAM LEBIH DEKAT ON TV ONE (PRAGMATIC APPROACH)
Abstract
This study aims to find out the types of directive speech act and politeness strategies used in Satu Jam Lebih Dekat talk show on TVOne. The method used in this article is descriptive method which describe the data systematically, factually, and accurately. The uninvolved conversation observation technique was used in collecting data in which this means that the present writer does not involve in the dialogues. Meanwhile, for data analysis technique, the present writer used pragmatic competence-in-dividing. The main theory of this article is the pragmatic theory of Searle’s Speech Act and Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Strategy. The results indicate that the types of directive speech act of Satu Jam Lebih Dekat program are to please, to request, to ask, to order, to invite, to forbid, to convince, to obligate, to show, to hope, to want, to warn, to advise, and to request. In addition, the politeness strategies are bald on record, positive politeness, negative politeness, and off record. The politeness of directive speech acts supports the effectiveness of talk show because of some factors such as types of directive speech act and politeness strategy.
Keywords: pragmatics, directive speech act, politeness strategy, talk show
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fotouhi, F., & Ziyaei, F. (2015). The role of politeness strategies in writing emails. Iran: Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Scieces, vol. 5, no. 1, hlm 5294-5298.
Gil, J.M. (2012). Face-Threatening speech act and face-invading speech act: an interpretation of politeness phenomena. Argentina: International Journal of Linguistics, vol. 4, no.2, hlm 400-411.
Grice, H.P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. England: Harvard University Press.
Gunarwan, A. (2007). Implikatur dan kesantunan berbahasa: tindak tutur dan kesantunan berbahasa: beberapa tilikan sandiwara ludruk dalam Yassir Nasanius (Peny). PELLBA 18. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Bahasa Dan Buadya Unika Atma Jaya.
Leech, G. (2015). Prinsip-prinsip pragmatik (Terjemahan oleh M.D.D Oka). Jakarta: UI Press.
Mahsun. (2012). Metode penelitian bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Moleong, L.J. (2015). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rahardi, K. (2005). Pragmatik: kesantunan imperatif bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga
Rahardi, K. (2009). Sosiopragmatik kajian imperatif dalam wadah sosiokultural dan konteks situasionalnya. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Santosa, R. (2014). Metode penelitian kualitatif kebahasaan. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech act an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J.R. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spradley, J.P. (2007). Metodologi etnografi. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Sulaiman, M., & Khoshaba, L. (2016). Speech act as a basic of understanding dialogue coherence with reference to English-Arabic Translation. Macedonia: International Jurnal of Social Science and Humanities, vol. 1, no. 1, hlm 68-98
Timberg, B. (2004). Television a history of the TV talk show. USA: University of Texas Press
Tripp, S.E., Guo, J., & Lampert, M. (1990). Politeness and Persuasion in Children’s Control Acts. North-Holland: Journal of Pragmatic, vol. 14, hlm 307-331.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Yuliana, R., Rohmadi, M., & Suhita, R. (2013). Daya Pragmatik Tindak Tutur Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama, Basastra: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Pengajaranya, vol. 2, no. 1, hlm 1-14.
Zhao, Y., & Throssell, P. (2011). Speech Act Theory and Its Application to EFL Teaching in China. Tasmania: The International Journal-Language Society and Culture, issue. 32, hlm 88-95.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.