Keefektifan Cognitive Behavior Theraphy untuk Mengurangi Perilaku Phubbing pada Peserta Didik SMP

lintang Rum Hapsari, Ulya Makhmudah, Ma'rifatin Indah Kholili

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to test the effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) in reducing phubbing behavior in junior high school students. This study uses an experimental method with a single case experimental design, the A-B design. Two male students in class VIII were the subjects of this study—data collection techniques using interview and observation guidelines. Data analysis used a split middle technique, and clinical analysis used a subjective evaluation method. The results of data analysis using the split middle technique, both research subjects, namely GFP and MIZ, experienced a decrease or change in behavior in the intervention phase compared to the baseline phase. The results of the split middle technique data show that the GFP subject has a slope of 0.48 and a change of 1.58. At the same time, the MIZ subject has a change in slope of 0.3 and a change in the level of 1.8. In line with the results of the split middle technique, based on the results of the clinical analysis with subjective evaluation, it was explained that the phubbing behavior of the subject had decreased. It was concluded because of the efforts of the two subjects to reduce phubbing behavior. It can be concluded that cognitive restructuring techniques are effective in reducing phubbing behavior in class VIII SMP students.

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menguji keefektifan cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) untuk mengurangi perilaku phubbing pada peserta didik SMP. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen dengan single case experimental design, rancangan desain A-B. Dua peserta didik laki-laki kelas VIII menjadi subjek dalam penelitian ini. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan pedoman wawancara dan pedoman observasi. Analisis data menggunakan split middle technique serta analisis klinis menggunakan metode evaluasi subjektif. Hasil analisis data menggunakan split middle technique kedua subjek penelitian yaitu GFP dan MIZ mengalami penurunan atau perubahan perilaku di fase intervensi dibanding fase baseline. Hasil dari data split middle technique menunjukkan subjek GFP terdapat perubahan slope 0.48 dan perubahan level 1.58. Sedangkan subjek MIZ  terdapat perubahan slope 0.3 dan perubahan level 1.8. Senada dengan hasil split middle technique tersebut, berdasarkan hasil analisis klinis dengan evaluasi subjektif menjelaskan bahwa perilaku phubbing pada subjek mengalami penurunan. Hal tersebut disimpulkan karena adanya usaha dari kedua subjek untuk mengurangi perilaku phubbing. Maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa teknik cognitive restructuring efektif untuk mengurangi perilaku phubbing pada peserta didik kelas VIII SMP.

Keywords

Cognitive Behavior Therapy; Phubbing Behavior; Middle School

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alford, B.A., & Beck,A.T. (1997). Cognitive Hypnotherapy: An Integrated Approach to the Treatment of Emotional Disorders. London : John Wiley & Sons Ltd .

Arikunto, S (2013). Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science

Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior 63 (2016) 9-18.

Ferris, D. L., Lian, H., Brown, D. J., & Morrison, R. (2015). Ostracism, self-esteem, and job performance: When do we self-verify and when do we self-enhance?. Academy of Management Journal.

Haigh, A. (2015). Stop phubbing. tersedia di http://stopphubbing.com.

Hellen. (2005). Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jakarta : Quantum Teaching.

Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., ... & Babadağ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2)

Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I., & Baumann, A. (2016). Why phubbing is toxic for your relationship: Understanding the role of smartphone jealousy among "Generation Y" users. Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), İstanbul,Turkey..

Nursalim, M. (2013). Strategi dan Intervensi Konseling. Jakarta: Akademia Permata.

Oemarjoedi, A.Kasandra. (2003). Pendekatan Cognitive Behavior dalam Psikoterapi. Jakarta: Kreativ Media

Pathak, S. (2013). McCann Melbourne made up a word to sell a print dictionary : New campaign for Macquarie birthed ’phubbing’.

Prayitno dan Erman, A. (2004). Dasar-dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jakarta: Rieneka Cipta.

Prayitno. (2004). Layanan Konseling Perorangan. Padang : Universitas Negeri Padang Press.

Purwanto, E. A & Sulistyastuti, D. R. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif untuk Administrasi Publik dan Masalah-Masalah Sosial. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Ranie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. (Online, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/) .

Retnawati, D. N. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing

Rofiq, A.A. (2017). Teori dan Praktik Konseling. Surabaya: Raziev Jaya.

Sukmadinata, N.S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya

Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. (2004). Pengendalian diri yang tinggi memprediksi penyesuaian diri yang baik, kurang patologi, nilai yang lebih baik, dan kesuksesan interpersonal. J Pers; 72: 271--324.

T'ng, ST, Ho, KH, & Low, SK (2018). Are you "phubbing" me? Determinants of phubbing behavior and assessment of measurement invariance between gender differences. RIMCIS – International and Multidisciplinary Journal of SocialSciences Vol. 7 No. 2 July 2018 pp. 159-190

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.