Antecedent and Consequence Model of Trust on Online Fashion Retail (Zalora)

Fauzia Nur Laili, Lilik Wahyudi

Abstract

This study has the purpose to understand the antecedents and consequences of trust in online shopping consumers. The model of three (perceived quality, perceived risk, and trust) increase the intention to purchase on the e-commerce platform. "Zalora" as one of the most popular fashion online in Asia has strategies to get their consumer's trust. This study is quantitative research using an online survey method. We share the link address of the survey using social media Whatsapp. We screened the questionnaire that had been filled by 372 respondents and we choose 238 respondents who met the requirements. In this study we use 4 variables perceived quality, perceived risk, trust, and intention to purchase. The results of this study indicate that perceived quality negatively affected perceived risk (-0.277). Perceived risk also negatively affected trust (-0.193). Meanwhile, perceived quality directly has a positive effect on trust (0.726) and trust has a positive effect on the intention to purchase on the Zalora eCommerce platform.

Keywords

Intention to purchase; online shopping; perceived quality; perceived risk; trust

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abbes, I., Hallem, Y., & Taga, N. (2020). Second-hand shopping and brand loyalty: The role of online collaborative redistribution platforms. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52(April 2019), 101885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101885

Agarwal, S., Teas, R. K., & Teas, R. K. (2006). Cross-national applicability of a perceived risk-value model Sanjeev Agarwal and. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420410546952

Akram, U., Ansari, A. R., Fu, G., Junaid, M., Luo, N., Wang, Y., … Kaur, P. (2019). David versus Goliath - Service quality factors for niche providers in online retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 56(June), 119913. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS.2018.8618174

Brengman, M., Brussel, V. U., & Karimov, F. P. (2012). The effect of web communities on consumers ’ initial trust in B2C e-commerce websites. (March 2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211256569

Chen, J., & Shen, X. (2015). Consumers ’ decisions in social commerce context : An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 79, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.07.012

Cheng, J. M. S., Wang, E. S. T., Lin, J. Y. C., Chen, L. S. L., & Huang, W. H. (2008). Do extrinsic cues affect purchase risk at international e-tailers: The mediating effect of perceived e-tailer service quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 15(5), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.11.001

Hair, J. (2010). Overview of Multivariate Analysis Methods.

He, D., Lu, Y., & Zhou, D. (2008). Empirical Study of Consumers’ Purchase Intentions in C2C Electronic Commerce. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13(3), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70046-4

Hosmer, L. T. (1995). TRUST : THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS. 20(2), 379–403.

Jiang, C., Rashid, R. M., & Wang, J. (2019). Investigating the role of social presence dimensions and information support on consumers’ trust and shopping intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51(June), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.06.007

Konuk, F. A. (2018). The role of store image, perceived quality, trust and perceived value in predicting consumers’ purchase intentions towards organic private label food. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43(May), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.04.011

Leonard, L. N. K., & Leonard, L. N. K. (2016). Attitude Influencers in C2C E-Commerce : Buying and Selling ATTITUDE INFLUENCERS IN C2C E-COMMERCE : BUYING AND SELLING. 4417(March). https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2012.11645554

Lu, B., Fan, W., & Zhou, M. (2016). Computers in Human Behavior Social presence , trust , and social commerce purchase intention : An empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.057

Luo, N., Wang, Y., Zhang, M., Niu, T., & Tu, J. (2020). Integrating community and e-commerce to build a trusted online second-hand platform: Based on the perspective of social capital. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153(November 2019), 119913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119913

Lwin, M. A. Y. O., & Williams, J. D. (2006). Promises , Promises : How Consumers Respond to Warranties in Internet Retailing. 40(2), 236–260.

Marakanon, L., & Panjakajornsak, V. (2017). Perceived quality, perceived risk and customer trust affecting customer loyalty of environmentally friendly electronics products. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.012

Mcknight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce : An Integrative Typology. 334–359.

Rahman, F., & Soesilo, P. K. M. (2018). The effect of information exposure of contract manufacturing practice on consumers’ perceived risk, perceived quality, and intention to purchase private label brand. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42(December 2017), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.010

Ribbink, D., Riel, A. C. R. Van, Liljander, V., & Streukens, S. (2002). Comfort your online customer : quality , trust and loyalty on the internet. 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520410569784

Tan, S. J., & Tan, S. J. (2006). Strategies for reducing consumers ’ risk aversion in Internet shopping.

Young Kim, E., & Kim, Y. (2004). Predicting online purchase intentions for clothing products. European Journal of Marketing, 38(7), 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560410539302

Zhao, J. Di, Huang, J. S., & Su, S. (2019). The effects of trust on consumers’ continuous purchase intentions in C2C social commerce: A trust transfer perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50(April), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.014

Zalora website https://www.zalora.co.id/about/ has been accessed 20 March 2021, 10.00 a.m

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v5i1.62101

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.