The effect of Phet Simulation media for physics teacher candidate understanding on photoelectric effect concept

Supurwoko Supurwoko, Cari Cari, Sarwanto Sarwanto, Sukarmin Sukarmin, Suparmi Suparmi


Indonesian new Curriculum for senior high school students required student-centered learning. One of the curriculum implementation constraint was the difficulty of providing learning media. PhET simulations media is one of the options that can help implementation of new curriculum on learning. However, the use of this media in Indonesia still needs to be studied comprehensively. The learning was conducted on students of physics education Study Program in sebelas maret university in 2013. The sample consisted of 62 students that was taking quantum physics course. The method that was used in the research was descriptive qualitative.  The method that was used in learning was demonstration’s method that used PhET media and accompanied by a question and answer and groups discussion. The data was collected using multiple choice test and interview through email. We found that any students still did not understand about photoelectric effect concept. They were confused when asked about the thick material and cross section of the targets as related with the regardless of electrons in the photoelectric effect event. Other than that, the concept of the waves as a particle and its relation with the kinetic energy of the electrons was not understood by most students.

Full Text:



A. Baddeley, (1992). Science. New Series. 255(5044), 556–559.

A. Beiser.1983. Konsep Fisika Modern (Terjemahan). Jakarta. Erlangga

B. K. Given. 2007. Brain Based Teaching. PT Mizan Pustaka. IKAPI.

D. R. Lloyd. 2015. American Journal of Physics Am. J. Phys., Vol. 83, No. 9, 765-772.

F. Paas, J. J. G. van Merriënboer. (1994). Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122–133.

J. Sweller, J. J. G. V. Merriënboer. (1998). Educational Psychology Review. 10(3), 251–296.

J. Sweller. (2004). Instructional Science. 32(1/2), 9–31.

M. Bétrancourt, B. Tversky. 2000. Le Travail Humain, 63, 311–329.

M. E. Yousif, 2015, IJFPS, Vol 5, No 1, pp 18-31, March , 2015.

P. S.Tambade, 2011, Europian Journal of Applied Sciences 3 (4) : 117 – 124. ISSN 2079-2077.

R. E. Mayer, R. Moreno. (2003). Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.

R. E. Mayer. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, 31–48.

S. Feinberg, M. Murphy. (2000). Proceedings of 2000 Joint IEEE International and 18th Annual Conference on Computer Documentation. (IPCC/SIGDOC 2000). 353–360. IEEE.

S. Kalyuga. (2009). Managing cognitive load in adaptive multimedia learning. London: IGI Global.

S. Klassen. 2011. Sci & Educ (2011) 20:719–731.

S. B. McKagan, K. K. Perkins. 2008, PACS numbers: 01.40.Fk,01.40.G-,,

T. Civeleka, E. Ucar, 2012, Social and Behavioral Sciences 47 ( 2012 ) 1780 – 1786


  • There are currently no refbacks.