The Effects of Critical Multiliteracy Learning Models on Mastery of Explanatory Text Concepts

Dadan Setiawan, Tatat Hartati, Rahman Rahman, Isah Cahyani

Abstract

The aims of this study was to determine the ability to master the concept of elementary school students through the implementation of critical multiliteracy learning models. This research was conducted on fifth grade students of elementary school. The research method used in this study was a quasi-experimental method. The participants in this study amounted to 39 students. Data was collected using tests and rubric. Analysis of data in this research using the t test with SPSS version 20.0 program for windows. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the mastery ability of the explanatory text concept of students experienced a significant increase and was included in the sufficient category. This can be seen from the pretest score obtained by students at 34.74 and the posttest results at 64.23. Based on the results of the t test the significance value is 0.00˂0.05 thus it can be concluded that there are significant differences between the mastery of students' concepts before and after being given treatment using critical multiliteracy learning models.

Keywords

Critical Multiliteracy Model; Mastery of Concepts; Explanatory Text

Full Text:

PDF

References

Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Nomor 24, 2016, tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran pada Kurikulum 2013 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.

Kemendikbud. (2014). Buku Guru Bahasa Indonesia Wahana Pengetahuan Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Priyatni, E.T. (2014). Desain Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Mahsun, (2014). Teks dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. 1997a. Text Types in English 1. Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.

Gerot, L. & Wignell. (1995). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Australia: Gerd Stabler.

Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring How Text Work. Newtown: PETA.

Emilia, E. (2012). Pendekatan Genre-Based dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris: Petunjuk untuk Guru. Bandung: Riqi Press.

Knapp, P & Watkins. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sydney: University of New South Wales.

Ting, S., Campbell, Y. M., Law, L., & Poh, H. (2013). Explanations without a purpose ? Genre-based instruction and academic writing, 7(1), 26–39.

Abidin, Y. (2015). Pembelajaran Multiliterasi Sebuah Jawaban atas Tantangan Pendidikan Abad Ke-21 dalam Konteks Keindonesiaan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Freire, P. (2005). Education for Critical Consciousness. London: Continuum.

Altas, B. (2014). A Case Study of Multimodal Presentation of Selected Stage Play Literature in a Multimedia Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1726–1734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.463.

Hesterman, S. (2011). A contested space: The dialogic intersection of ICT, multiliteracies, and early childhood. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2011.12.4.349.

Navehebrahim, M. (2011). Multiliteracies Approach to empower learning and teaching engagement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 863–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.315.

Giampapa, F. (2010). Multiliteracies, Pedagogy and Identities: Teacher and Student Voices rom a Toronto Elmentary School. Canadian Journal Of Education. 33,2 (2010). 407-431.

Alexander, K. P., DePalma, M. J., & Ringer, J. M. (2016). Adaptive Remediation and the Facilitation of Transfer in Multiliteracy Center Contexts. Computers and Composition, 41, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.005.

Silvers, P., Shorey, M., & Crafton, L. (2010). Critical literacy in a primary multiliteracies classroom: The hurricane group. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(4), 379–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798410382354.

Setiawan, D. (2019). Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Multiliterasi Kritis dengan RADEC dalam Kemampuan Menulis dan Penguasaan Konsep Teks Eksplanasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. (Tesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2019).

Susilo, S. & Ramdiati, T. (2019). Penerapan Model Multiliterasi Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Menulis Karangan Persuasi Pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 5 (1), pp. 24-31.

Dafit, F. (2017). Keefektifan Kemampuan Menulis Kreatif Siswa SD Dengan Model Pembelajaran Multiliterasi. Gerakan Aktif Menulis, 5, Hlm. 49-57.

Nurhalimah, S. (2016). Perbandingan Efektivitas Model Multiliterasi Kritis dan Model Menulis Otentik Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Teks Persuasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. (Skripsi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2016).

Iskandar, C. C., Abidin, Y., & Yunansah, H. (2016). Penggunaan Model Multiliterasi Kritis Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Siswa Dalam Menulis Karangan Argumentasi. Jurnal PGSD Kampus Cibiru, 4(3).

Decker, S. L., Roberts, A. M., Roberts, K. L., & Stafford, A. L. (2016). Cognitive components of developmental writing skill, 53(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.

Allison, E., & Goldston, M, J. (2018). Modern Scientific Literacy : A Case Study of Multiliteracies and Scientific Practices in a Fifth Grade Classroom, 27, 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9723-z.

Iyer, R., & Luke, C. (2010). Multimodal, Multiliteracies: Text and Literacies for the 21st Century. Dalam Pullen & Cole (Eds.). Multiliteracies and Technology Enhanced Education: Social Practice and the Global Classroom. New York: Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v3i1.32550

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.