The Comparison of Cooperative Learning Model Viewed from Students’ Emotional Intelligence

Ahmad Junaedi, Budiyono Budiyono, Isnandar Slamet

Abstract

This research aimed to know the different influence of each learning model, emotional Intelligence, and interaction between those two elements toward the students’ achievement in mathematic. This is an experimental study within the 3x3 factorial design. The populations of this study were VII grade students of State Junior High Schools (SMP) in Surakarta city in academic year of 2016/2017. The samples of this study were students of SMPN 8 Surakarta, SMPN 16 Surakarta, and SMPN 20 Surakarta which were taken by stratified cluster random sampling. The instruments to collect the data were achievement test, questionnaire and documentation. The technique to analyze the data was variance analysis of two ways with different cell. Based on the result, it can be concluded that: (1) TGT model produced the same good result as well as TAI model, TGT model produced the better achievement than the direct learning, and TAI model produced the better achievement than direct learning in the algebra material. (2) Students having high emotional intelligence are better than students having low and medium emotional intelligence in term of achievement in mathematics. The students having medium emotional intelligence are as low as students having low emotional intelligence in term of achievement in algebra material. (3) In each category of emotional intelligence, TGT model produced higher achievement than TAI model and direct learning model, TAI and direct learning model produced the equal result in algebra material. (4) In each learning model, students’ achievement of those who have high emotional intelligence are higher than those who have medium and low emotional intelligence, and students who have low and medium intelligence produced the equal achievement in algebra material.

Keywords

TGT, TAI, Learning Achievement and Emotional intelligence.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Birknerova, Z. 2011. Social and Emotional Intelligence in School Environment. (Asia: Asian Social Science), 7(10): 241-248.

Duxbury, J. G., & Tsai, L. (2010). The effects of cooperative learning on foreign language anxiety: A comparative study of Taiwanese and American universities. (Amerika: International Journal of Humanities and Social Science), 2 (16), 1-18.

Fitria, K Eksperimentasi Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Model Kooperatif Tipe Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar Se Kecamatan Depok (Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, 2009).

Goleman, D. 2003. Working with Emotional Intelligence (terjemahan). (Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama).

Johnson, M.C. & Wang, A. 2003. Emotional Intelligence and Academic Performance of College Honors and Non-Honors Freshmen. Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council, 10(1): 105-114.

Nurhadi, 2004. Pembelajaran Kontekstual dan Penerapannya dalam KBK. (Indonesia: Universitas Negeri Malang, Surabaya).

Nwadinigwe, I.P. & Azuka-Obieke, U. 2012. The Impact of Emotional Intelligence on Academic Achievement of Senior Secondary School Students in Lagos, (Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS), 3(4): 395-401.

Onyekuru, B. U. 2015. Field Dependence-Field Independence Cognitive Style, Gender, Career Choice and Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students in Emohua. Local Government Area of Rivers State Journal of Education and Practice, 6 (10), 76 – 85.

Suparno, P. (2004). Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. (Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius`)

Salmani, M. A. & Nodoushan. (2007). Is Field Dependence or Independence a Predictor of EFL Reading Performance? (Tesl Canada Journal/Revue Tesl Du Canada), 24 (2), 82-108,

Sudjana, N. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. (Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo).

Slameto. (2003). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. (Jakarta. Rineka cipta).

Slavin, Robert E. 2005. Cooperative Learning (Cara efektif dan menyenangkan pacu prestasi seluruh peserta didik). (Bandung: Nusa Media).

Stefy E.N. 2012. Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran number head togedher (NHT) dan Think Pair Shere (TPS) Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau dari Tingkat Kecerdasan Emosional siswa SMP Negeri di Kabupaten Sukoharjo. (Tesis Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surakarta. Tidak diterbitkan).

Ulfa, N. F. (2016). The Experimentation of Learning Model Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) and Think Talk Write (TTW) Viewed from the Adversity Quotient on The Topic of function in Eighth-grade of State Junior High School In Boyolali Regency in Academic Year 2015/2016. (Indonesia: UPT)

Wenno, H. (2014). Direct Instruction Model to Increase Physical Science Compentence of Students as One Form of Classroom Assesment. (International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education), 3 (3), 169-174.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.