Profile of Doctoral Student’s Motivation in Science Education Program: A Mini Research

Arina Zaida Ilma, Ananda Aprilia, Dwi Purbowati, Susdarwati Susdarwati, Putri Anjarsari, Widodo Setiyo Wibowo, Norma Bastian, Rita Bekti Utami

Abstract

The evolving landscape of higher education and its potential implications for the careers of doctoral graduates is growing. This research aims to analyze the motivation profiles of doctoral students in a Science Education program. Survey data was collected from students enrolled in the Science Education Doctoral Program at Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta in the 2024/2025 academic year. Ten question surveys with qualitative open-ended questions were developed in this research. Findings highlight intrinsic, integrated, and identified motivational factors and their potential implications for educational practices in doctoral programs in science education. The recommendations provided institutions to design more effective support strategies to ensure the academic success and contribution of doctoral students to the advancement of science education in Indonesia.

Keywords

doctoral student, motivation, science education

Full Text:

PDF

References

OECD, Education at Glance 2024: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024.

W. Hussar and T. Bailey, “A Publication of the National Center for Education Statistics at IES Projections of Education Statistics to 2028 Forty-seventh Edition,” Inst. Educ. Sci., no. 47, 2020.

L. Colucci-Gray, A. Perazzone, M. Dodman, and E. Camino, “Science education for sustainability, epistemological reflections and educational practices: From natural sciences to trans-disciplinarity,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 127–183, 2013.

I. Zogla, “Science of pedagogy: Theory of educational discipline and practice,” J. Teach. Educ. Sustain., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 31–43, 2018.

J. G. Bagaka’S, N. Badillo, I. Bransteter, and S. Rispinto, “Exploring student success in a doctoral program: The power of mentorship and research engagement,” Int. J. Dr. Stud., vol. 10, pp. 323–342, 2015.

A. Sverdlik, N. C. Hall, L. McAlpine, and K. Hubbard, “The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being,” Int. J. Dr. Stud., vol. 13, pp. 361–388, 2018.

J. Posselt, “Normalizing Struggle: Dimensions of Faculty Support for Doctoral Students and Implications for Persistence and Well-Being,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 988–1013, 2018.

J. Stubb, K. Pyhältö, and K. Lonka, “Conceptions of research: the doctoral student experience in three domains,” Stud. High. Educ., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 251–264, 2014.

I. Skakni, “Doctoral studies as an initiatory trial: expected and taken-for-granted practices that impede PhD students’ progress,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 927–944, 2018.

J. Amani, H. Myeya, and M. Mhewa, “Understanding the Motives for Pursuing Postgraduate Studies and Causes of Late Completion: Supervisors and Supervisees’ Experiences,” SAGE Open, vol. 12, no. 3, 2022.

K. Kovács, B. Dobay, S. Halasi, T. Pinczés, and I. Tódor, “Demands, resources and institutional factors in the work of academic staff in Central and Eastern Europe: results of a qualitative research among university teachers in five countries,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, no. January, pp. 1–13, 2023.

T. Urdan and K. Bruchmann, “Examining the Academic Motivation of a Diverse Student Population: A Consideration of Methodology,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 114–130, 2018.

R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 61, no. April, p. 101860, 2020.

Cally Guerin, A. Jayatilaka, and D. Ranasingh, “Why start a higher degree by research ? An exploratory factor analysis of motivations to undertake doctoral studies,” High. Educ. Res. Dev., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 89–104, 2015.

J. C. Shin, S. J. Kim, E. Kim, and H. Lim, “Doctoral students’ satisfaction in a research-focused Korean university: socio-environmental and motivational factors,” Asia Pacific Educ. Rev., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 159–168, 2018.

P. S. Smith and C. L. Plumley, “K-12 science education in the United States: A landscape study for improving the field,” no. December, p. 52, 2022.

Y. Li, K. Wang, Y. Xiao, and J. E. Froyd, “Research and trends in STEM education: a systematic review of journal publications,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020.

A. Z. Ilma, I. Wilujeng, A. Widowati, M. Nurtanto, and N. Kholifah, “A Systematic Literature Review of STEM Education in Indonesia (2016-2021): Contribution to Improving Skills in 21st Century Learning,” Pegem Egit. ve Ogr. Derg., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 134–146, 2023.

A. Z. Ilma, I. Wilujeng, and Z. K. Prasetyo, “Literature Review of Science Learning Activities with Integrated STEM Education,” vol. 2022, pp. 8–14, 2022.

J. Filgona, J. Sakiyo, D. M. Gwany, and A. U. Okoronka, “Motivation in learning,” Asian J. Educ. Soc. Stud., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 16–37, 2020.

J. M. Blaney, J. Kang, A. M. Wofford, and D. F. Feldon, “Mentoring relationships between doctoral students and postdocs in the lab sciences,” Stud. Grad. Postdr. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 263–279, 2020.

M. A. Xu and G. B. Storr, “Learning the concept of researcher as instrument in qualitative research,” Qual. Rep., vol. 17, no. 21, pp. 1–18, 2012.

R. Ceglie, “Initial Motivations of Doctoral Education Students,” J. Adv. Educ. Res., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 20–31, 2019.

D. Litalien, F. Guay, and A. J. S. Morin, “Motivation for PhD studies: Scale development and validation,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 41, pp. 1–13, 2015.

M. Offerman, “Profile of the Nontraditional Doctoral Degree Student,” in New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, no. 129, 2011.

A. S. Douglas, “Engaging doctoral students in networking opportunities: a relational approach to doctoral study,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 322–338, 2023.

Y. Kotera, E. Taylor, D. Fido, D. Williams, and F. Tsuda-McCaie, “Motivation of UK graduate students in education: self-compassion moderates pathway from extrinsic motivation to intrinsic motivation,” Curr. Psychol., vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 10163–10176, 2023.

J. Gu, J. S. Levin, and Y. Luo, “Reproducing ‘academic successors’ or cultivating ‘versatile experts’: influences of doctoral training on career expectations of Chinese PhD students,” High. Educ., vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 427–447, 2018.

A. Baptista, L. Frick, K. Holley, M. Remmik, and J. Tesch, “The doctorate as an original contribution to knowledge: Considering relationships between originality, creativity, and innovation,” Front. Learn. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 55–67, 2015.

T. S. M. Meerah et al., “Measuring Graduate Students Research Skills,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 60, pp. 626–629, 2012.

R. Logue-Conroy, J. Harty, J. Y. Lee, L. Markovitz, and J. O’Gara, “Doctoral students’ academic and professional network development: A collaborative autoethnography of students engaged in fatherhood research.,” Int. J. Dr. Stud., vol. 16, pp. 611–631, 2021.

B. Etmanski, D. Walters, and D. Zarifa, “Not What I Expected: Early Career Prospects of Doctoral Graduates in Academia,” Can. J. High. Educ., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 152–169, 2017.

C. P. Matas, “Doctoral Education and Skills Development: An International Perspective Educación doctoral y desarrollo de competencias: Una perspectiva internacional,” Rev. Docencia Univ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 163–191, 2012.

D. Bienkowska and M. Klofsten, “Creating entrepreneurial networks: Academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education,” High. Educ., vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 207–222, 2012.

E. Phillips and C. Johnson, How to Get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors 7e. United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill Education, 2022.

J. Sjaastad, “Sources of Inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1615–1636, 2012.

S. Berry, “Student support networks in online doctoral programs: Exploring nested communities,” Int. J. Dr. Stud., vol. 12, pp. 33–48, 2017.

E. Löfström and K. Pyhältö, “What Are Ethics in Doctoral Supervision, and How Do They Matter? Doctoral Students’ Perspective,” Scand. J. Educ. Res., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 535–550, 2020.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v8i1.106959

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.