USING TALKING CHIPS TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ PARTICIPATION IN EFL CLASSROOM

Fitria Hardiyanti, Dewi Rochsantiningsih, Endang Setyaningsih

Abstract

This classroom action research is aimed at identifying whether the use of Talking Chips improves student’s participation in English class, and identifying the strengths and weaknesses of Talking Chips when it is implemented. The research was conducted in a cycle at the tenth grade of a senior high school in Surakarta, Central Java, from February through June 2013. The data were collected through observation, questionnaire, field notes, photographs and interview. The data were analyzed using constant comparative method. The research findings show that the implementation of Talking Chips improves the students’ participation in English class. The improvement includes: 1) Students were active and brave to speak aloud and most of them answered questions voluntarily, 2) Most of the students asked the teacher confidently and they even gave comment to their classmates’ answer, 3) Some students were able to answer teacher’s questions spontaneously, 4) Students enjoyed working in a group and gave contribution to the discussion, 5) Most of the students looked confident when speaking English in front of the class although they need a long preparation, and 6) Students were more focused on the task and classroom activity.

Keywords

Talking Chips; students’ participation; EFL classroom

Full Text:

PDF

References

Barkley, Elizabert E., Cross, K. Patricia,

Major, C.H. Collaborative Learning

Technique. (2005). San Francisco:

Jossey-Bass.

Chickering, A.W. & Gamson, Z.F. (1987).

Seven Principles of Good Practice in

Undergraduate Education. American

Association of Higher Education

Bulletin, 3-7.

Education Broadcasting Corporation. (2004). What are the Benefits of

Cooperative and Collaborative Learning? Concept to Classroom.

Retrieved from http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/con cept2class/coopcollab/index_sub3. html

Jackson J. (2002). Reticence in second language case discussions: Anxiety and aspirations. System, 30(1), 65-84.

Kagan, Dr. Spencer & Kagan, Miguel.

(2009). Kagan Cooperative

Learning. San Clemente: Kagan Publishing.

Mustapha, S.M. & Abd Rahman, N.S.N. (2011). Classroom Participation Patterns: A Case Study of Malaysian

Undergraduate Students.

International Journal for Educational Series, 3[2], 2011.

Retrieved from www.educare-

ijes.com/articles.php?mod=detail&id =9094

Silberman, Melvin L. (1996). Active

Learning: 101 Strategies to Teach

Any Subject. Allyn and Bacon.

Tatar, S. (2005). “Why Keep Silent? The Classroom Participation Experiences

of Non-Native-English-Speaking

Students”. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5, 284-293.

Tsui ABM. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. M. Bailey, & D. Nunan (eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 145–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yule, George. (2006). The Study of Language: 3rd Edition. New York:

Cambridge University Press

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.