A Content Analysis on The English Textbook “The Bridge English Competence 2” Used by The Eighth Year of Junior High School

Yuliarti Inggit Utami, A. Handoko Pudjobroto, Dewi Sri Wahyuni

Abstract

This research aims to investigate whether or not the language skills materials in “The Bridge English Competence 2” textbook are compatible with indicators in language skills of School based Curriculum and investigate whether or not the exercises in “The Bridge English Competence 2” textbook are communicative. The writer used a descriptive method. In collecting the data, she used document as data source. The data were analyzed by these steps: (1) Finding out the kinds of skill and communicative exercise available on the textbook, (2) Classifying them, (3) Analyzing them, (4) Counting and adding them, (5) Giving percentage from the total number, (6) Judging whether or not the data are appropriate with the indicators in School-based Curriculum or not, and (7) Drawing conclusion and proposing suggestions. The result of the analysis shows that the percentage of the appropriateness of the skills developed in the textbook “The Bridge English Competence 2” is 56.57% (listening: 57.60%; speaking: 60%; reading: 37.50%; writing: 87.50%). It means that the textbook is compatible with the School-based Curriculum in developing listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills. The textbook is a good textbook to support the complete material in English teaching-learning process for the students of junior high schools. Meanwhile, the percentage in developing the communicative exercises is 62.5%, meaning that it is good.

Keywords

content analysis; English textbook “the bridge english competence”

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agung Swasono Teguh Prakoso. 2010. Unpublished manuscript, Thesis: A Content Analysis on “English in Focus” An English Textbook for the Grade VII Junior High School. English Department. SebelasMaret University.

Anonim. 2006. Standarisi untuk Satuan Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Badan Standar

Arif Sadiman (Ed.). 1993. Metode dan Analisa Penelitian. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ary, Donald, Jacobs, Lucy C. Razaviech, Asghar. 1982. Pengantar Penelitian Dalam Pendidikan. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Brown, H. Douglas. 1994. Teaching by Principles Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York: Prentice Hall Regents.

Brown, Lewis and Harcleroad. 1964. A-V Instruction: Material and Methods. New York: McGraw Hill.

Brumfit, C.J. amd Johnson, K. 1998.The Communicative approach to Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

IbnuPriyono. 2004. Unpublished manuscript, Thesis. A Content Analysis on “English for the Junior High School

Book 1 for the First Year”.English Department.SebelasMaret University.

Jordan, R.R. 1997. English for Academic Purposes.A Guide and Resource Book for Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Krashen, Stephen. D and Terrell, Tracy. D. 1995. The Natural Approach. Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Great Britain: Phoenix ELT.

Mulyasa E. 2007. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT RemajaRosdakarya.

Nunan, David. The learner-Centered Curriculum. 1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richard, Jack. C and Rodgers, Theodore S. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. United States of America: Cambridge University Press.

Savignon, Sandra. J. 1997. Communicative Competence Theory and Classroom Practice: Texts and Contexts in Second Language Learning. Pennsylvania:: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

NasionalPendidikan. Retrieved from http://ktsp.files.wordpress.com/2006/ 11/bahasa inggris.pdf in March, 4 2012

Suharsimi Arikunto. 1998. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta:PTRinekaCipta.

Sutrisno Hadi. 1987. Metode Penelitian.

Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Wina Sanjaya. 2008. Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.