Improving Students’ Ability in Writing Recount Text Using Peer Correction

Reski Novitasari, Martono Martono, Teguh Sarosa

Abstract

This article discusses the implementation of Peer Correction technique to improve the students’ ability in writing a recount text at a senior high school in Wonogiri. This research aimed to know how Peer Correction technique can be implemented effectively to improve the students’ writing ability and to what extent the improvement can be achieved. The qualitative data were collected through observation, questionnaire, and interview. While quantitative data were obtained from the students’ tests. The findings submitted that: 1)Peer Correction can be implemented effectively because of the students’ learning awareness during the correction process which help them to get a better reflection related with their own future written tasks and it must be supported with an adequate feedback especially face-to face feedback, 2) it could improve the students’ writing competence viewed from the improvement in the five aspect namely grammar, content, vocabulary, mechanic, and organization, 3) it also makes a better classroom dynamic during the writing class. As the finding of this research has not yet investigated the effect on self-evaluation, further researches might be in a longer period are highly recommended.

Keywords

peer correction; writing skill; recount text

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bartels, N. (2003). Written peer response in L2 writing. English Teaching Forum,4: 34-38.

Carson, J. & Nelson, G. L. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language

Writing, 3,17-30.

Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press

Ferris, D.R & Hedgcock, J.S (2005). Teaching ESL Composition. Purpose, Process, and Practice. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Publisher London

Hansen, J. and Liu, J (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59: 31-38.

Harmer, J. (2005). The Practice of English Language Teaching. London:

Pearson-Longman

Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kemmis, S. (1988). Action Research: Educational Research, Methodology,

and Measurement. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

McCarthey, S. J. (1992). The teacher, the author, and the text: variations in form and content of writing conferences. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 24(1), 51–82.

Mangelsdorf, K. (1989). Parellels between speaking and writing in second language acquisition. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 134-145). New York: Longman.

Richards, J. C and Renandya, W. A (2002).

Methodology in Language Teaching.

Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT

Journal, 59: 23-30.

Sagor, Richard. (2005). The Action Research Guidebook: A Four-Step Process for Educators and School Teams. California: Corwin Press.

Topping, K.J., Smith, E.F., Swanson,I., and Elliot, A. (2000). Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students, Assement & Evaluation in Higher Education. 25(2). pp. 149-169

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.