Correlation Between Cohesive Devices Mastery and Learning Motivation Toward Reading Comprehension

Arining Tyas Utomo, Muh. Asrori, Hefy Sulistyawati

Abstract

The aims of the research are to investigate whether there is a positive correlation between (1) cohesive devices mastery and reading comprehension; (2) learning motivation and reading comprehension; (3) cohesive devices mastery, learning motivation simultaneously toward reading comprehension. The method used in this research is correlation. The study was conducted at a senior high school in Sukoharjo. The population of the research consists of 253 students. The sample is 34 students taken by cluster random sampling. The instruments in collecting the data are questionnaire and objective test. The technique of analyzing the data are simple and multiple linear regression and correlation. The result of the research shows that there is a positive correlation between (1) cohesive devices mastery and reading comprehension; (2) learning motivation and reading comprehension; (3) cohesive devices mastery, learning motivation simultaneously toward reading comprehension. Based on the research result, it can be concluded that cohesive devices mastery and learning motivation give contribution in the improvement of reading comprehension.

Keywords

cohesive devices; learning motivation; reading comprehension

Full Text:

PDF

References

Baker, Linda and Allan W. Dimensions of Children’s Motivation and Their Relation to Reading Activity and reading Achievement. 1999. Reading research Quarterly, 34,452-477.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2000. Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy Second Edition. San Francisco: Longman

Brown, H. Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practice. San Francisco: Longman.

Elliot, Stephen. N. et.al 2000. Educational Pshychology; Effective Learning. Madison: Brown and Benchmark Publisher.

Gascoine, Carolyn. 2005. Toward and understanding of the relationship between L2 reading comprehension and grammatical competence. The Reading Matrix, 5, 1-14.

Halliday, M., and Hasan, R., 1976. Cohesion in English. London. Longman.

Hallonen, Jane S and Santrock, John W. 1999. Psychology: Applied and Application 3rd. New York: Mc Graw-Hill College.

Malthy et.al. 1995. Educational Psychology, An Australian and New Zealand Perspective. Singapore: John Willey and Son.

Nunan, David. 1998. Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

Nuttal, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford: McMilla Heinmann.

Slavin, Robert E. 1997. Educational Psychology; Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Snow, Catherine E. 2002. Reading for Understanding: toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. New York: Rand Corporation.

Sukamto, Stephanus. Cohesive Devices Recognition Skills-Building Exercises. 2007. Celt. Vol 7, No. 1, p

-50.

Wallace, C. 1996. Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.