The Correlation Between Studeerest And Structure nts’ Learning IntMastery and Students’ Reading Skill
Abstract
The objective of this research is to find out whether there is a correlation between (1) students‟ learning interest and students‟ reading skill; (2) students‟ structure mastery and students‟ reading skill; and (3) students‟ learning interest, students‟ structure mastery simultaneously, and students‟ reading skill. This correlational study involved 36 students at one of state senior high school in Sukoharjo. The technique of choosing the sample was cluster random sampling. Data were collected through questionnaire and test. Single and Multiple Regresssion and Correlation were used to analyze the data. The result of the data analysis shows that: (1) there is a positive correlation between students‟ learning interest and students‟ reading skill; (2) there is a positive correlation between students‟ structure mastery and students‟ reading skill; and (3) there is a positive correlation between students‟ learning interest, students‟ structure mastery simultaneously, and students‟ reading skill. It means that students‟ learning interest and students‟ structure mastery cannot be neglected in teaching reading skill.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Brown, H. Douglas. 2004. Language Assesment:Principles and Classroom Practice. San Francisco: Pearson Education.
Chang, Shih-Chuan. 2011. “A Contrastive Study of Grammar Translation Method and Communicative Approach In Teaching English Grammar”. English Language Teaching Vol. 4, No. 2; June 2011
Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. 2011. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Eidswick, J. (2009). The influence of interest on reading comprehension in EFL students. Annual Research Report of the Language Center, 12, 25-38. Kwansei Gakuin University.
Erfort, Michael. 2014. Reading Skill. Cape Peninsula: University of Technology.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Hidi, Suzanne. 2001. Interest, Reading, And Learning: Theoretical And Practical Considerations. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2001.
Hidi, S. & Renninger, K. A. 2006. The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127. Lawrence Erlbaurn Associates, Inc.
Hornby, A.S. 2005. Oxford Advanced Leamer's Dictionary (Seventh Edition) .Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jung, Jookyoung. 2013. “Second Language Reading and the Role of Grammar”. Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, Vol. 9, No. 2.
Lȕck, Kerstin. 2008. “Web-based Foreign Language Reading: Affective and Productive Outcomes”. CALICO Journal, 25(2), p-p 305-325.
Palmer, F. R. 1971. Grammar. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books Limited
Perfetti, Charles A. 2001. “Reading Skill”. Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Science. Elsevier Science Ltd.
Purwanto. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif untuk Psikologi dan Penelitian, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sudjana, Nana & Ibrahim. 2009. Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan, Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 2008. Membaca Sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.
Thornbury, Scott. 1999. How to Teach Grammar. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Widodo, Handoyo Puji. 2006. “Approach and Procedures for Teaching Grammar”. Vol.5, No.1; May 2006.
Witherington, H. Carl. 1982. Educational Psychology (Revised Edition). Boston, Massachusetts: Ginn and Company.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.