The Use of Teaching Factory-Based Learning Models to Optimize Social Science Learning Outcomes Among Vocational School Students

Sarjoko Sarjoko, Indah Widyastuti, Suharno Suharno, A.G Tamrin, Budi Tri Cahyono

Abstract

This study explores the use of a teaching factory-based learning model to optimize Natural and social sciences learning outcomes in Vocational High Schools. Teaching Factory emerged as an innovative solution that bridges vocational education and the industrial world by integrating real production experiences into learning. This model not only equips students with technical skills but also prepares them to face the complexities of the world of work. This study uses a mixed methods approach with the Exploratory Sequential Design method, starting with a qualitative exploration to understand learning phenomena, followed by a quantitative method to test qualitative findings. Data was collected through participatory observation, in-depth interviews, document analysis, and learning experiments. The results of the study show that the Teaching Factory has excellent potential to increase the relevance of science learning, develop students' practical skills, and motivate students. However, its implementation faces challenges such as limited resources and a lack of institutional support. This research emphasizes the importance of the Teaching Factory as an effective learning model in vocational education, with implications for curriculum development, teacher training, and industry collaboration.

Keywords

Mixed Methods; Science Social; Teaching Factory

Full Text:

PDF

References

Albrecht, J. R., & Karabenick, S. A. (2018). Relevance for Learning and Motivation in Education. Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1380593

Bamrungsin, P., & Khampirat, B. (2022). Improving Professional Skills of Pre-Service Teachers Using Online Training: Applying Work-Integrated Learning Approaches through a Quasi-Experimental Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074362

Cahyono, B. T. (2022). Study Management to Improve the Motivation of Educators Through Merdeka Belajar. Al-Fikrah : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, X(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31958/jaf.v10i1

De Prada Pérez De Azpeitia, F. I. (2016). Infrared thermography: An amazing resource for teaching physics and chemistry. Revista Eureka, 13(3), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev

Diwangkoro, E., & Soenarto, S. (2020). Development of teaching factory learning models in vocational schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1456(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1456/1/012046

Farida, I., Setiawan, R., Maryatmi, A. S., & Juwita, M. N. (2020). The Implementation of E-Government in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0 in Indonesia. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 22(2), 340–346. http://ijpsat.ijsht-journals.org

Ferns, S., Russell, L., & Kay, J. (2016). Enhancing industry engagement with work-integrated learning: Capacity building for industry partners. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 17(4), 363–375.

Fischer, E., & Hänze, M. (2019). Back from "guide on the side" to "sage on the stage"? Effects of teacher-guided and student-activating teaching methods on student learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 95(March 2019), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.03.001

García-Carmona, A. (2020). From Inquiry-Based Science Education to the Approach Based on Scientific Practices: A Critical Analysis and Suggestions for Science Teaching. Science and Education, 29(2), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00108-8

Gerritsen-van Leeuwenkamp, K. J., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Kester, L. (2019). Students' perceptions of assessment quality related to their learning approaches and learning outcomes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63(July 2018), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.005

Hatmojo, Y. I., & Ikhsannudin, W. (2024). Development of Teaching Factory Learning Model in Industrial Automation in Vocational High Schools. Jurnal Edukasi Elektro, 8(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.21831/jee.v8i1.68772

Hernández-Leo, D., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Derntl, M., Pozzi, F., Chacón, J., Prieto, L. P., & Persico, D. (2018). An integrated environment for learning design. Frontiers in ICT, 5(MAY), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00009

Jing, Z., Turi, J. A., Lu, S., & Rosak-Szyrocka, J. (2023). Sustainability through Factory-Based Learning in Higher Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065376

Kailani, A., & Rafidiyah, D. (2020). Opportunities and Challenges in the Implementation of Ten Revitalization Strategies of Vocational Schools in Indonesia: School Principals' Voices. International Journal of Educational Best Practices, 4(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.31258/ijebp.v4n2.p60-77

Luederitz, C., Schäpke, N., Wiek, A., Lang, D. J., Bergmann, M., Bos, J. J., Burch, S., Davies, A., Evans, J., König, A., Farrelly, M. A., Forrest, N., Frantzeskaki, N., Gibson, R. B., Kay, B., Loorbach, D., McCormick, K., Parodi, O., Rauschmayer, F., … Westley, F. R. (2017). Learning through evaluation – A tentative evaluative scheme for sustainability transition experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005

Mavrikios, D., Georgoulias, K., & Chryssolouris, G. (2018). The Teaching Factory Paradigm: Developments and Outlook. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.029

Priniski, S. J., Hecht, C. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2018). Making Learning Personally Meaningful: A New Framework for Relevance Research. Journal of Experimental Education, 86(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1380589

Putri Irna Amalia, & Murniawaty, I. (2020). Economic Education Analysis Journal, Economic education analysis journal. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 9(3), 831–843. https://doi.org/10.15294/eeaj.v14i1.20589

Saputro, I. N., Soenarto, S., Sofyan, H., Riyanita, M. C., Rebia, P. S., & Listiana, A. (2021). The Effectiveness of Teaching Factory Implementation in Vocational Education: Case Studies in Indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(11), 1841–1856. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.091104

Schwab, K. (2018). the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0) a Social Innovation Perspective. Tạp Chí Nghiên Cứu Dân Tộc, 7(23), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.25073/0866-773x/97

Starrett, A., Yow, J., Lotter, C., Irvin, M. J., & Adams, P. (2021). Teachers connecting with rural students and places: A mixed methods analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103231

Subekti, S., Ana, A., Barliana, M. S., & Khoerunnisa, I. (2019). Problem-solving improvement through the teaching factory model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/2/022044

Syauqi, K., Munadi, S., & Bruri Triyono, M. (2022). Sustainable Partnership Strategy: Case Studies in Vocational High Schools and Partner Industries. Qualitative Report, 27(8), 1483–1498. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5481

Toyon, M. A. S. (2021). Explanatory sequential design of mixed methods research: Phases and challenges. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(5), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i5.1262

Tri Cahyono, B., Prihatin, R., Sukmawati, F., Budhi Santosa, E., & Author Budi Tri Cahyono, C. (2023). Development of Authentic Assessment with Project Based Learning Approach in Primary School Students. Qalamuna, 15(1), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v15i1.3987

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/teknodika.v24i1.116643

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.