Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Teknodika (p-issn:1693-9107 & e-issn: 2656-6621) merupakan jurnal penelitian teknologi pendidikan yang menerbitkan kajian, analisis, dan penelitian tentang perancangan, pengembangan, pengelolaan, pemanfaatan, evaluasi dalam bidang Teknologi Pendidikan yang berkaitan dengan peningkatan kinerja dan memfasilitasi belajar di lembaga pendidikan formal, non-formal dan informal serta lembaga-lembaga pelatihan. 

Adapun topik yang masuk kategori ini meliputi:
Media Pembelajaran
Model Pembelajaran
Sumber Belajar
Pendidikan Jarak Jauh
E-Learning & Online learning
Analisis Kurikulum
dan topik lain yang relevan

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Teknodika menerima manusrip artikel yang belum pernah diterbitkan sebelumnya. Artikel yang diterima akan ditelaah oleh setidaknya dua penelaah, dan dewan editor. Penulis diharapkan memperbaiki manuskrip sesuai hasil telaah dari tim editor. Editor akan memproses artikel untuk dipublikasi sesuai ketentuan. Keputusan Editor tidak dapat di ganggu gugat.

Teknodika memiliki proses dua tahap peninjauan. Tahap pertama adalah tinjauan editorial awal oleh salah satu editor utama, menghasilkan keputusan untuk mengirim ulasan sejawat (tahap 2) atau penolakan editorial. Proses peninjauan editorial biasanya memakan waktu sekitar 1-2 minggu tetapi bisa lebih lama pada periode tertentu. Jika artikel diteruskan ke tahap 2, Mitra Bestari akan ditugaskan untuk mengelola proses peninjauan. Di sini, dua atau lebih anggota mitra bestari akan ditugaskan untuk meninjau artikel. Peninjau yang dipilih untuk mengulas artikel dipilih berdasarkan pengalaman, keahlian, dan minat mereka yang selaras dengan fokus artikel.

Teknodika menggunakan proses 'double blind review'. Artinya, pengulas tidak diberi nama dan afiliasi institusional penulis, dan penulis tidak diberi nama-nama pengulas yang ditugaskan untuk artikel mereka. Oleh karena itu penting agar penulis menghapus semua informasi pengidentifikasian dari artikel termasuk menghapus referensi dalam teks yang akan memungkinkan pengulas untuk mengidentifikasi penulis, misalnya referensi untuk penulis yang sebelumnya diterbitkan. Nama, afiliasi institusional, dan referensi dapat ditambahkan jika artikel tersebut diterima untuk publikasi.

Artikel akan ditinjau berdasarkan kriteria seberapa baik: judul artikel merepresentasikan isi artikel, abstrak dan kata pengantar menggambarkan esensi artikel, pendahuluan mencerminkan pentingnya permasalahan tersebut diteliti, metode penelitian dan pendekatan pemecahan masalah dijelaskan secara rinci, data dan interprestasi data yang ditampilkan layak (rasionable) dan jelas, pembahasan sesuai dengan esensi artikel, Tabel dan Gambar memperjelas isi artikel, pembahasan dan analisis relevan dengan hasil penelitian, kontribusi terhadap ilmu pengetahuan, referensi yang digunakan relevan, originalitas, dan sistematika penulisan.

Jika artikel Anda dianggap cocok untuk dikirim untuk mitra bebestari, Anda biasanya akan diberi tahu tentang hasil dari proses peer review dalam waktu 1 bulan dari waktu pengajuan. Hasil telaah mitra bestari menjadi pertimbangan editor untuk menerima atau menolak artikel untuk dipublikasi. Apabila artikel diterima untuk publikasi akan dilakukan pemeriksaan unsur plagiasi menggunakan Turnitin.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Fee

Contributors in Teknodika will be charged IDR 200,000 for the publication process. Fees are paid when articles are accepted for publication by the editorial team

 

Publication Ethics

Plagiarism Checker

The article that can be reviewed by editor board after completing the attachment of plagiarism checker and stated that article at least 80% is the origin. The following are the tools of checker:

  1. Plagiarism
  2. Duplicity-Checker 
  3. Turnitin
  4. Plagiarism Checker
  5. Other tools of plagiarism

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

Master Program of Educational Technology Sebelas Maret University as publisher of TEKNODIKA takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. 

Publication decisions

The editor of the TEKNODIKA is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.