Sic Utere Tuo Ut Alienum Non Laedas: State Responsibility and Environmental Obligations in the Context of Climate Change

Diah Apriani Atika Sari, Marsudi Triatmodjo, Harry Purwanto

Abstract

The principle of Sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas requires the state to avoid environmental damage and to prevent harmful activity on its territory. UNFCCC laws restrict states from emitting excessive greenhouse gases. Avoiding environmental damage is crucial to protecting against losses and mitigating global warming in the context of climate change. This study aimed to examine of the interplay between the principle of Sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas, the duty to refrain from environmental degradation, and the responsibility of tackling climate change. The results show that the state caused increasing sea levels, melting glaciers and polar ice, and unpredictable hydrological cycles due to enormous greenhouse gas emissions.  Climate change was less important than the sovereign right to develop and explore natural resources.  International legislative tools like the Climate Change Convention slowed climate change. International law requires environmental protection under sic utere tuo ut alienum non-laedas. Climate change conventions did not accept this principle. In Anglo-Saxon law, sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas—the principle of no harm—required state accountability for international law infractions and restitution.  The state was held accountable under international law for excessive greenhouse emissions under strict liability.


Keywords

Climate Change; Sic Utere Tuo Ut Alienum Non Laedas; State Responsibilty.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adolf, Huala. (2015). Aspek-Aspek Negara Dalam Hukum Internasional. Keni Media

Barboza, Julio. (2011). The Environment, Risk and Liability in International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers

Crawford, James. (2013). State Reponsibility: The General Part. Cambridge University Press

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie. (2018). International Environmental Law. Cambridge University Press

Kiss, Alexandre., & Shelton, Dinah. (2007). Guide to International Environmental Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers

Koivurova, Timo. (2014). Introduction to International Environmental Law. Routledge

Mayer, Benoit. (2018). The International Law on Climate Change. Cambridge Univeristy Press

Naghtzaam, G. et.al. (2020). International Environmental Law: A Case Study Analysis. Routledge

Nanda, Ved P., & Pring, G., (2013). International Environmental Law and Policy for the 21st Century. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers

Orakhelashvili, Alexander. (2019). Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law. Routledge

Pramudianto, Andreas. (2017). Hukum Lingkungan Internasional. Raja Grafindo Persada

Rajaman, Lavanya., & Peel, Jacqueline. (2021). International Environmental Law. Oxford University Press

Robertson, Michai. (2018). Climate Change Loss and Damage Response as a Peremptory Norm of General International Law. Global Governance Institute

Robertson, Michai. (2018). Climate Change Loss and Damage Response as a Peremptory Norm of General International Law. Global Governance Institute

Rudy, May. (2006). Hukum Internasional 1. Refika Aditama

Sands, Philippe. (2018). Principles of International Environmental Law. Cambridge University Press

Shaw, Malcolm N. (2017). International Law. Cambridge University Press

Shue, Henry. (2014). Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford University Press

Thontowi, Jawahir., & Iskandar, Pranoto. (2006). Hukum Internasional Kontemporer. Refika Aditama

Weatherall, Thomas. (2022). Duality of Responsibility in International Law: The Individual, the State, and International Crimes. Brill Nijhoff

Mackielo, Andrea, L., (2009) "Core Rules of International Environmental Law," ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law. Vol. 16: 1

Shabnam. (2002). "Sic Utere Tuo Ut Alienum Non Laedus- The Property Use Domain of the Maxim for Environmental," Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, Volume 9, Issue 6

Summary for Policy Maker. (2022). Sixth Assessment Report of IPCC (AR6). Working Group II

Judgement International Court of Justice. Corfu Channel Case. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Nothern Ireland v. Albania. 1949.

Reports of Arbitral Tribunal, Lake Lanoux Case. France v. Spain. 1957.

Reports of International Arbitral Awards. Rainbow Warrior Case. New Zaeland v. France. 1990.

Reports of International Arbitral Awards. Trail Smelter Case. United State v. Canada. 1941.

Reports of Judgment, Advisory Opinions and Orders. 1996. The Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons.

Kyoto Protocol to the United Conventions Framework Convention on Climate Change. 1998.

United Conventions Framework Convention on Climate Change. 1992.

United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. Stockholm Declaration: Declaration on the Human Environment. 1972.

United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. 1982.

United Nations General Assembly. (A/61/10). Draft Principles on the Allocation of Loss in the Case of Transboundary Harm Arising Out of Hazardous Activities. 2006.

https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_10_2006.pdf

United Nations General Assembly. A/56/10. Draft articles on Prevention of Transboundary Harm from Hazardous Activities. 2001.

United Nations General Assembly. Resolutions 1629 (XVI). Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. 1961.

United Nations General Assembly. Resolutions 56/83. Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. 2001.

United Nations General Assembly. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. A/Conf.151/26 (Vol.I). 1992.

United Nations. Paris Agreement. 2015.

https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf

https://www.mongabay.co.id/2023/02/10/menolak-tenggelam-warga-pulau-pari-resmi-gugat-holcim-di-pengadilan-swiss/

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.