Enhancing Consumer Protection in the Indonesian Financial Service Sector through the Utilization of Standardized Contracts

Lastuti Abubakar, Tri Handayani

Abstract

The Financial Services Sector is a pioneer in developing standard contract regulations. This standard contract complements Contract Law that did not initially regulate standard contracts. This study aims to analyze the development of standard contract regulation in the Indonesian financial services sector. It examines aspects that require strengthening so that standard contracts can become a protecting consumer tool in the financial services sector. This study uses a normative juridical approach with a descriptive-analytical research specification. The results show that: 1) The development of standard contract regulations in the POJK on Consumer Protection used by Financial Service Business Actors (PUJK) contains the principles and prohibitions on including exoneration clauses and undue influence. This provision fills the legal vacuum regarding standard contracts that still refer to the freedom of contract principle and Book III of the Civil Code and other related regulations. The use of the standard contracts encourages PUJK to comprehend the importance of consumer protection; 2) OJK should strengthen regulatory aspects by issuing guidelines on standard contract formats and contain correct interpretations of the scope of undue influence and supervise the standards contract both directly and indirectly that have been implemented by PUJK.

Keywords

Consumer Protection; Financial Service Sector; Standard Contract

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2017). Telaah Yuridis Terhadap Implementasi Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Bank Dalam Aktivitas Perbankan Indonesia. Jurnal De Lega Lata, 2(1).

Anna Maria Tri Anggraini, Simanjuntak, M., Safari, A., Halim, R. E., & Riyadi, S. (2022). Consumer Protection in the Retail and Financial Services Sectors against the Practice of Exoneration Clauses. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 7(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.29244/jcs.7.2.83-96

Cornelius, K. B. (2018). Standard form contracts and a smart contract future. Internet Policy Review, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.14763/2018.2.790

Dari-Mattiacci, G., & Marotta-Wurgler, F. (2022). Learning in Standard-Form Contracts: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Legal Analysis, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laad001

Davies, P. S. (2019). THE BASIS OF CONTRACTUAL DUTIES OF GOOD FAITH. Journal of Commonwealth Law, 1, 1–34. www.judiciary.uk/wp-

Departemen Statistik (DSta) Bank Indonesia. (2016). Suku Bunga. Metadata; Informasi Dasar Suku Bunga.

Friedman, & Lawrence M. (1987). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russel Sage Foundation.

Handayani, F. (2022). DESIGN AND LEGAL ASPECT OF CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY: A LITERATURE REVIEW. Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions, 1(3), 509–536. https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v1i3.35

Herlien Budiono. (2008). Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan. Citra Aditya.

I Gst. Agung Rio Diputra. (2018). Pelaksanaan Perancangan Kontrak dalam Pembuatan Struktur Kontrak Bisnis. Jurnal Acta Comitas, 3(3), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i03.p1 3

Irakli, T. (2017). The Principle of Freedom of Contract, Pre-Contractual Obligations Legal Review English, EU and US Law. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(4), 62. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n4p62

Kadek Desy Pramita, & Kadek Diva Hendrayana. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Investor Sebagai Konsumen dalam Investasi. JURNAL PACTA SUNT SERVANDA, 2(1), 1–7. https://ejournal2.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JPSS

Lastuti Abubakar & Tri Handayani. (2018). Perkembangan Transaksi Di Sektor Jasa Keuangan dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Pembaharuan Hukum Kontrak Nasional. Buletin Kebanksentralan, 15(1), 64.

Mahendar, F., & Budhayati, C. T. (2019). Konsep Take It Or Leave It Dalam Perjanjian Baku Sesuai Dengan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Alethea, 2(2), 97–114. https://ejournal.uksw.edu/alethea

Mariam Darus Badrulzaman. (2015). Hukum Perikatan dalam Hukum Perdata Buku Ketiga – Yirisprudensi, Doktrin serta Penjelasan. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Muliatno, M. N., Kenotariatan, A. M., Miru, A., & Kenotariatan, M. (2020). Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Dalam Kontrak Baku Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Gorontalo Law Review, 3(2).

Panggabean, R. M. (2010). Keabsahan Perjanjian dengan Klausul Baku. Jurnal Hukum, 4(17).

Poernomo, S. L. (2019). Standar Kontrak dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.v19.109-120

Prasnowo, A. D., Badriyah, S. M., Kata, A., Keseimbangan, A., Perjanjian Baku, ;, & Pihak, P. (2019). Implementasi Asas Keseimbangan Bagi Para Pihak dalam Perjanjian Baku. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 8(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01

Rachmanto, A. D. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Akibat Perjanjian Baku Dan Klausula Baku Pasca Keberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(4), 826. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no4.1805

Samantha Kiel. (2019). Consumer Protection Models and Theories.

Saputra, A. F. (2022). Partnership Consultation: An Alternative Solution to the Nonexistent Collective Bargaining Right in the Indonesian Ride Hailing Gig Economy Sector. Yuridika, 37(1), 93–124. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i1.34599

Sektor, D. I., Keuangan, J., Dan, B. E., & Konsumen. (2015). Modul Workshop Perlindungan Konsumen.

Wiwin Dwi Ratna Febriyanti. (2022). Abuse of Circumstances (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) in Developing Contract Law in Indonesia. US-China Law Review, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6605/2022.02.003

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.