Autocratic Legalism: the Making of Indonesian Omnibus Law

Zainal Arifin Mochtar, Idul Rishan

Abstract

The Indonesian House of Representatives’ approval of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation marks a significant enhancement of the business climate and a step forward for labor market flexibility, which should, over time, improve the country’s international competitiveness. But, the Constitutional Court delivered shocking news by declaring that the omnibus Job Creation Law, is partly unconstitutional on November 2021. This study aims to reveal two things. First, procedural injustice in the making of Indonesian Omnibus Law on Job Creation. Second, the root of autocratic legalism and its prevention. The study is a doctrinal legal research with qualitative analysis. It has identified that (1) five violations of procedural justice in the making of the omnibus law reflect autocratic legalism in Indonesia; and (2) three factors contribute to the phenomenon. The three contributing factors are (i) the co-optation of the ruling party in the parliament, (ii) the violations of the law and constitution, and (iii) the undermined judicial independence. Indeed, the cartelization in political parties should be ended. Therefore, citizens need to conduct strengthened collective control. In addition, the independence of the Constitutional Court should be preserved.

Keywords

autocratic legalism; omnibus law; political parties

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alexander, L. (2018). Law and Politics: What Is their Relation? Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 42(1), 356. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3449352

Ambardi, K. (2008). The Making of the Indonesian Multiparty System: A Cartelized Party System and Its Origin. Dissertation at the Ohio State University.

Barros, R. (2002). Constitutionalism and Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606298

Black, H. C. (1910). Black Law Dictionary. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.

Butt, S. (2015). The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004250598

Cody, S. (2021). Dark Law: Legalistic Autocrats, Judicial Deference, and the Global Transformation of National Security. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law & Public Affairs, 6(4), 671.

Corrales, J. (2015). The Authoritarian Resurgence: Autocratic Legalism in Venezuela. Journal of Democracy, 26(2), 41.

Cui, Y., & Lu, C. (2018). Are China's unit labour costs still competitive? A comparison with ASEAN countries. Asian‐Pacific Economic Literature, 32(1).

Dixon, R., & Landau, D. (2021). Abusive Constitutional Borrowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893765.001.0001

Galligan, D. J. (1997). Due Process and Fair Procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gerschewski, J. (2021). Erosion or decay? Conceptualizing Causes and Mechanisms of Democratic Regression. Democratization, 28(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2020.1826935

Ginsburg, T., & Huq, A., Z. H. (2018). How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. London: University of Chicago Press.

Ginsburg, T., & Moustafa, T. (2018). Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (2012). Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000287

Huq, A. Z., & Ginsburg, T. (2017). How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy. UCLA Law Review, 65, 143. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2901776

Kompas. (2020). Survei Litbang Kompas: 59,7 Persen Responden Anggap Pembahasan UU Cipta Kerja Tak Demokratis. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/10/26/09433601/survei-litbang-kompas-597-persen-responden-anggap-pembahasan-uu-cipta-kerja?page=all, 26/10/2020.

Kosař, D., & Šipulová, K. (2018). The Strasbourg Court Meets Abusive Constitutionalism: Baka v. Hungary and the Rule of Law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 10(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-017-0065-y

Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishing Group.

Mahy, P. (2021). Indonesia's Omnibus Law on Job Creation: Reducing Labour Protections in a time of COVID-19. Labour, Equality and Human Rights (LEAH) Research Group, Working Paper, (23).

Massicotte, L. (2013). Omnibus Bills in Theory and Practice. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 36(1), 15.

Mochtar, Z. A. (2012). Penataan Lembaga Negara Independen Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945. Dissertation at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Posner, R. A. (2003). Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

Power, T., & Warburton, E. (2021). Demokrasi di Indonesia: dari Stagnasi ke Regresi?. Jakarta: Public Virtue and Kurawal Foundation.

Przeworski, A., & Simpser, A. (2014). Ruling against Rules. In T. Ginsburg & A. Simpser (Ed.), Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107252523.003

Ramadhan, R., Daulay, M. H., & Disyacitta, F. (2022). Reviewing the prospects of forest decentralization in Indonesia after the Omnibus Law. International Forestry Review, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1505/146554822835224793

Rishan, I. (2020). Risiko Koalisi Gemuk Dalam Sistem Presidensial Di Indonesia`. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art1

Rishan, I., & Nika, I. (2022). Inkompatibilitas Metode Omnibus Law Dalam Penyederhanaan Regulasi. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(1), 166–188. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss1.art8

Riyanto, S., et al. (2020). Ringkasan Eksekutif Kertas Kebijakan Catatan Kritis Terhadap UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja. Faculty of Law Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Rousseau, J.J. (1994). Discourse on Political Economy and The Social Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Samadhi, W. P. (2021). The Absence Popular Control: Disorientasi Perkembangan Kapasitas Politik Kolektif Aktivis Pro Demokrasi Pasca 1998. Dissertation at the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Scheppele, K. L. (2018). Autocratic Legalism. The University of Chicago Law Review, 85(2), 549.

Sethi, A. (2021). The “Method and Madness” of Authoritarian Constitution Making in Democratic Regimes. Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie: Diritto, Istituzioni, Società, 3(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3942280

Soraya, B. A., Permatasari, D. A., & Yukamujrisa, N. (2021). Peran Hukum Dalam Menghadapi Perubahan Sosial dan Kejahatan Dunia Maya. Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/jolsic.v1i1.50137

Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Designing Democracy: What Constitutions Do. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tushnet, M., Fleiner, T., & Saunders, C. (2013). Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law. London: Routledge.

Unger, R. M. (1983). The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Harvard Law Review, 96(3), 561–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341032

Wiratraman, H. P. (2021). Political Cartels and the Judicialization of Authoritarian Politics in Indonesia. Symposium |Constitutional Struggles in Asia | Part II |, 2.

Wyrzykowski, M. (2019). Experiencing the Unimaginable: the Collapse of the Rule of Law in Poland. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(2–3), 417–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-019-00124-z

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v11i1.59296

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.