Depiction of Public Interest Theory Based on the Welfare Economic Concept on Indonesia Regulation

Grace Sharon, Bintang Aulia Hutama, Aghnia Risqa Hudiyarahma, Levina Yustitianingtyas

Abstract

The theory of public interest has become a long debate, and the philosophical meaning is commonly discussed in various research. Generally, it is equated with the needs or interests of the wider community. Public interest has become an interchangeable term in various concepts, from individual needs as intended in natural law to the development of the latest theory of Utilitarianism. The state as the holder of sovereignty and authority has the obligation to carry out the public interest. However, the meaning of this concept is limited in Indonesia, as stated in several laws, one example is the public interest that is always associated with land regulation. It is undeniable through a conventional concept that the subject of land is understood as an asset that has economic value. However, with the development of the economic concept of existing assets, it is found that the concept of public interest is lagging. Therefore, this research has two main objectives: (1) to provide an overview for the elaboration of the concept of interests that are limited by existing laws and regulations in Indonesia, and (2) to take the essence of the economy for the benefit of the public.

Keywords

economic welfare; philosophical meaning; public interest;

Full Text:

PDF

References

A. C. Pigou. (1932). The economics of welfare. Retrieved from http://files.libertyfund.org/files/1410/0316_Bk.pdf

Ahiakpor, J. C. W. (1999). Retard the Development of. The Independent Review, v, 355–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/135704

Alexander, E. R. (2009). The Public Interest in Planning: From Legitimation to Substantive Plan Evaluation. Planning Theory, I(3), 226–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/147309520200100303

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. (2013). Memperkenalkan Gagasan Konstitusi Ekonomi. Jurnal Hukum Prioris Vol. 3 No. 2. Retrievied from https://www.trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/prioris/article/view/360. ISSN: 2548-6128

Asshiddiqie. (2002). Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia Di Masa Depan. Jakarta. Pusat Studi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Baujard, A. (2013). Welfare economics. Groupe D’analyse Et De Théorie Économique Lyon St Étienne Wp, 1–20. Retrieved from https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00906907

Chakim, M. L. (2011). Uji Materiil MK thd 3 UU (UU Air, UU Minerba, n UU Ketenagalistrikan) (pp. 1–10). pp. 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.lutfichakim.com/2011/12/analisis-penafsiran-pasal-33-uud-1945.html

Cho, Sungjoon. (2006). Toward a New Economic Constitution: Judicial Disciplines on Trade Politics. Chicago Kent College of Law. Retrieved From http://ssm.com/abstract=929709

Dictionary, the C. E. (n.d.). the Cambridge English Dictionary. Retrieved from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/value

Dictionary, T. L. (n.d.). The Law Dictionary (Black’s Law Dictionary). Retrieved from https://thelawdictionary.org/value/

Dworkin, Ronald. (1973). Legal Research, Daedalus, spring.

Elliott, J. E. (2010). Marx and schumpeter on capitalism’s creative destruction: a comparative restatement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95(1), 45–68. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1885348 Accessed:

Felber, C., & Die. (2014). Die Gemeinwohl-Ökonomie. Retrieved from https://www.hanser-elibrary.com/doi/pdf/10.3139/9783552062993.fm

G Kitay Michael. (1985), “Land Acquisition in Developing Countrie”s, Policies and procedures of public sector, with survey and case studies from Korea, India, Thailand, and Equador, Oelgeschlager. Gunn&Hain, Boston. Publishers, Inc.

Hantke-domas, M. (2003). The Public Interest Theory of Regulation : Non-Existence or Misinterpretation ? 165–194.

Hantono, D., & Pramitasari, D. (2018). Aspek Perilaku Manusia Sebagai Makhluk Individu dan Sosial Pada Ruang Terbuka Publik. Nature: National Academic Journal of Architecture, 5(2), 85-93.

Hertog, J. Den. (1999). General theories of regulation. Economic Institute/ CLAV, Utrecht University, 223–270.

Hossain, F. M. A., & Ali, K. (2014). Relation between Individual and Society. (August), 130–137.

Hutagalung, Ari Sukanti. (2002), Penyelesaian sengketa Tanah menurut Hukum Yang Berlaku, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol. 8 Maret, Jakarta.

Irshad, C. (2016). Five Theories of Welfare Economics. Retrieved from https://www.grin.com/document/336546

Johnston, J. (2017). The public interest : A new way of thinking for public relations ? Public Relations Inquiry, 6(I), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X16644006

Jundiani. (2015). Aktualisasi Antinomi Nilai-Nilai Filosofis Pasal 33 UUD 1945. de Jure, Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum. Volume 7 Nomor 2.

Konstitusi, M. (2012). PUTUSAN Nomor 50/PUU-X/2012. Retrieved from http://jdihn.go.id/files/148/putusan_sidang_50 PUU 2012-telah baca 13Feb2013.pdf

Land Procurement concerning implemetntation of development for the public interest Presidential Decree Number 55 of 1993 (IND.). https://jdih.esdm.go.id/storage/document/Keppres%20No.%2055%20Thn%201993.pdf

Land Procurement concerning implemetntation of development for the public interest Presidential Regulation Number 36 of 2005 (IND.). http://perundangan.pertanian.go.id/admin/p_presiden/Perpres-36-05.pdf

Land Procurement concerning implemetntation of development for the public interest Presidential Regulation Number 65 of 2006 (IND.). https://jdih.esdm.go.id/storage/document/Perpres%20No.%2065%20Thn%202006.pdf

Land Procurement for the public interest law number 2 of 2012, (DPR) (IND.). https://jdih.esdm.go.id/storage/document/UU%20No.%202%20Thn%202012.pdf

Lexico. (n.d.). Lexico Powered By Oxford. Retrieved from https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/value

M, Wiering., & Winnubst, M. (2017). Environmental Science & Policy The conception of public interest in Dutch fl ood risk management : Untouchable or transforming? Environmental Science and Policy, 73, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.002

Magnar, K., Junaenah, I., & Taufik, G. A. (2004). Tafsir MK Atas Pasal 33 Uud 1945 : ( Studi Atas Putusan MK Mengenai Judicial. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7, 1–180. Retrieved from https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/109597-ID-tafsir-mk-atas-pasal-33-uud-1945-studi-a.pdf

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2004). Putusan 001-021-022/PUU-I/2003. Retrieved from https://mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/Putusan001PUUI2003

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2005). Putusan 008/PUU-III/2005.

Manan Bagir. (1995). Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Konstitusi Suatu Negara, Bandung. Mandar Maju.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta. Pranada Media Group.

Muwahid. (2015). Implikasi Yuridis Kekaburan Makna Kepentingan Umum Dalam Undang-Undang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Kepentingan Umum. Al-Hikmah Junral Studi Keislaman. Volume5.

Perpustakaan Lemhanas RI. (n.d.). Page 16 - Perpustakaan Lemhannas RI (p. 16). p. 16. Retrieved from http://lib.lemhannas.go.id/public/media/catalog/0010-121500000011655/swf/4270/files/basic-html/page16.html

Revocation of Rights to Land and Objects Law Number 20 of 1961, (DPR) (IND.). https://www.atrbpn.go.id/Publikasi/Peraturan-Perundangan/Undang-Undang/undang-undang-nomor-20-tahun-1961-918

Rothbard, M. N. (1995). Economic Thought Before Adam Smith (Volume I). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

S.W. Maria Sumardjono. (2008). Tanah dalam Perspektif Hak Ekonomi, Sosial, Budaya. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Shailes, K. (n.d.). Pigovian Welfare Economics (With Evaluation). Retrieved from http://www.economicsdiscussion.net/welfare-economics/pigovian-welfare-economics-with-evaluation/21051

Shank, G. (2002). Qualitative Research. A Personal Skills Aproach. New Jersey. Merril Prentice Hal.

State Administrative Court Law Number 9 of 2004, (DPR) (IND.). https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/fulltext/2004/9TAHUN2004UU.html

Sukarno. (1964). Camkan Pancasila: Pancasila Dasar Falsafah Negara. Jakarta. Departemen Penerangan RI.

Sukarno. (1964). Dibawah Bendera Revolusi, Jilid Pertama. Jakarta. Panitya.

The Basic Agrarian Rules Law Number 5 of 1960, (DPR) (IND.). http://www.jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/fullText/1960/5TAHUN~1960UU.HTM

Wattimena, R. A. . (2013). Pemikiran christian felber tentang ekonomi kesejahteraan publik. Respons Jurnal Etika Dan Sosial, 8, 213–256. Retrieved from http://ejournal.atmajaya.ac.id/index.php/response/article/view/752

Wiering, M., & Winnubst, M. (2017). Environmental Science & Policy The conception of public interest in Dutch fl ood risk management : Untouchable or transforming? Environmental Science and Policy, 73, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.