E-COURT AS THE PREVENTION EFFORTS AGAINST THE INDONESIA JUDICIAL CORRUPTION

Susanto Susanto

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the use of E-Court to eliminate judicial corruption activities. Actions or policies permitted by law and which are not permitted. Corruption in the administration sector is closely related to the relationship between justice seekers and individual administrative staff. The issues raised in this study are How is the systematic E-Court in Suppressing Judicial Corruption in Case Administration Management in Courts in JABODETABEK and How to Improve Administrative Management of Courts in the Future. This study uses an empirical method approach with descriptive analytical research specifications. This is because this study seeks to describe the facts of the E-Court System Effectiveness in the field of suppressing Corruption in the Court's administrative management sector and the factors faced so that it can finally describe the concept of implementing a clean court management system with technology and improvement efforts. The concept of public services must be well understood by the judiciary, because until now there are still many complaints about legal services originating from the justice seeker community. The functionalization of E-Court is not optimal because there are still many justice seekers who still do not know the existence and use of the system. The E-Court system is expected to support the realization of judicial principles that are fast, simple and inexpensive in managing case administration

Keywords

E-Court, Court Administrative System, Corruption.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Books:

Atikah, I. (2018). Implementasi E-Court dan Dampaknya Terhadap Advokat Dalam Proses Penyelesaian Perkara di Indonesia.

BPKP. (1999). Strategi Pemberantasan Korupsi Nasional, Pusat Pendidikan dan Pengawasan BPKP, Jakarta, Cet I.

Djamal, (2009), Hukum Acara Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) di Indonesia, Bandung : Pustaka Reka Cipta.

Mochtar, K.2002. Konsep-Konsep Hukum dalam Pembangunan, Bandung, Alumni.

Syprianus Aristeus, 2008, Eksaminasi Terhadap Putusan Hakim Sebagai Partisipasi Publik, Jakarta, BPHN.

Journals:

Baskoro, B. D. (2013). Perseteruan KPK dengan POLRI Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42(3), 336-345.

Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2010). Judicial mafia: The courts and state illegality in Indonesia. In The state and illegality in Indonesia (pp. 189-213). BRILL.

Najicha, F. U., & Hermawan, S. (2019, October). Law in the Globalization and Its Influence on Economic Development and Environmental Preservation based on Pancasila and the Indonesian Constitution of 1945. In 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019). Atlantis Press.

Muhamad Iqbal, Susanto, Moh Sutoro. (2019). Efektifitas Sistem Administrasi E-Court dalam Upaya Mendukung Proses Administrasi Cepat, Sederhana dan Biaya Ringan di Pengadilan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Universitas Riau, 8(2)(302-315)

Raharjo, A., Angkasa, A., & Bintoro, R. W. 2015 . Akses Keadilan Bagi Rakyat Miskin (Dilema dalam Pemberian Bantuan Hukum oleh Advokat). Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 27(3).

Susanto, S. (2018). Kedudukan Hasil Audit Investigatif Pada Kekayaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara Persero Dalam Hukum Pembuktian Pidana di Indonesia. JURNAL CITA HUKUM, 6(1), 139-162.

Sudrajad, T. 2009. Perwujudan Good Governance Melalui Format Reformasi Birokrasi Publik Dalam Perspektif Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 9(2).

Tejomurti, K., Hadi, H., Imanullah, M. N., & Indriyani, R. (2018). Legal Protection for Urban Online-Transportation-Users’ Personal Data Disclosure in the Age of Digital Technology. Padjadjaran Journal of Law, 5(3), 485-505.

Wibowo, B. R. (2012). BATAS KEWENANGAN ARBITRATOR DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DAGANG MELALUI ARBITRASE. Jurnal Magister Hukum, 3(1).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i1.41127

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.