JAPANESE CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REFORM : WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF OUTSIDE DIRECTORS ?
Abstract
The topic of outside directors’ functions has been attracting significant attention for many years now, especially in the discussions about corporate governance reform in Japan. Over the last two decades, most listed Japanese companies have voluntarily introduced outside directors into their boardrooms, in line with the gradual change in an overall corporate governance system toward a monitoring board model moving away from the more traditional management board model. It appears the recent trend is for companies to add outside directors to their boards of directors to increase corporate values. In the midst of transforming the management board model into the monitoring board model, closely reexamining the functions of outside directors is necessary. What can be concluded from the lessons learned from recent corporate scandals and the discussions concerning the functions of outside directors is: (1) outside directors should be truly independent from the company’s management; and (2) outside directors need access to the company’s corporate information in order to prevent corporate scandals and to provide appropriate advice to the company’s management. This paper aims at considering how to make outside directors more effective and their roles more substantial, based on the history of corporate governance reform in Japan.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Books:
Aoki, Hidetaka, 2017, ‘企業統治と会計不正 企業のガバナンス改革は有効か? (Tr.:Corporate Governance and Accounting Fraud, Is Corporate Governance Reform Effective?)’, in Hideaki Miyajima, ‘企業統治と成長戦略 (Tr.: Corporate Governance and Growth Strategy).
Aronson, Bruce E, 2012, ‘The Olympus Scandal and Corporate Governance Reform: Can Japan Find a Middle Ground between the Board Monitoring Model and Management Model?’
Aronson, Bruce E, 2015, ‘The Toshiba Corporate Governance Scandal: How Can Japanese Corporate Governance be Fixed?’
Aronson, Bruce E, 2017, ‘Case Studies in Independent Directors in Asia” in Dan W. Puchniak, Harald Baum and Luke Nottage “Independent Directors in Asia’
Asian Corporate Governance Association (ACGA), 2006, “ACGA White Paper on
Corporate Governance in Japan”
Eberhart, Robert N., 2012, ‘Corporate Governance Systems and Firm Value: Empirical
Evidence from Japan’s Natural Experiment’
Japan Revitalization Strategy revised in 2014
Kanda, Hideki, 2018, ‘会社法(第20版)(Tr.: Companies Act 20th edition)’
Keidanren,Nippon,2009,‘より良いコーポレート・ガバナンスを目指して(主要論点の中間整理)(Tr.: Toward Better Corporate Governance (Interim Discussion Paper on Key Issues)’
Kojima, Minako, 2013, ‘コーポレート・ガバナンスにおける監査役制度の強化 (Tr.: Enhancement of Auditor System in Corporate Governance’, in Hideyuki Kobayashi and Hitoshi Takahashi, ‘コーポレート・ガバナンスにおけるソフトローの役割 (Tr.: The Role of Soft Law in Corporate Governance’, Chapter 12.
Miyajima, Hideaki and Keisuke Nitta, 2011, ‘株式所有構造の多様化とその帰結–株式持ち合いの解消・「復活」と海外投資家の役割 (Tr.: Diversification of Shareholding Structure and its Consequences – Dissolution and “Revival” of Cross-Shareholdings and Roles of Foreign Investors)’ in Miyajima, ‘日本の企業統治 (Tr.: Japan’s Corporate Governance)’
Miyajima, Hideaki, 2017, ‘日本の企業統治の進化をいかにとらえるか 危機後の再設計に向けて(Tr.: How do we Capture the Developments of Japanese Corporate Governance? Toward the Redesign after the Crisis)’, in Hideaki Miyajima, ‘日本の企業統治 (Tr.: Japan’s Corporate Governance)’
Olympus, 2012, ‘臨時株主総会決議ご通知 (Tr.: Notice concerning the Results of the Extraordinary Shareholders General Meeting)’.
Osano, Hiroshi and Keiichi Hori, 2011, ‘「メイン寄せ」による規律付けと実証分析 (Tr.: Discipline through “Main-yose” and Empirical Research)’, in Miyajima ‘日本の企業統治 (Tr.: Japan’s Corporate Governance)’
Saito, Takuji, 2011, ‘日本企業による社外取締役の導入の決定要因とその効果 (Tr.: Reasons to Introduce Outside Directors into Japanese Companies and its consequences)’, in Miyajima ‘日本の企業統治 (Tr.: Japanese Corporate Governance)’
Suruga Bank, Ltd, 2018, ‘第三者委員会の報告書の受領と今後の当社の対応について (Tr.: Receipt of Investigation Report from the Third Party Committee and the Bank’s Response Policy)’, Section 1., SURUGA Bank Ltd. (2018), ‘第三者委員会報告書 (Tr.: The Third-party Committee Report)’,
Tanaka, Kazuhiro, 2014, ‘「良心」から企業統治を考える 日本的経営の倫理 (Tr.: Think of Corporate Governance from the viewpoint of “Conscience”, Ethics in Japanese Management)’.
Tanaka, Wataru, 2017, ‘企業統治改革の現状と展望 (Tr.: Current Situations and Prospects of Corporate Governance Reform)’ in Miyajima, ‘企業統治と経営戦略 (Tr.: Corporate Governance and Management Strategy)’
The Corporate Law Subcommittee (Corporate Governance) of Legislative Council, 2018, ‘The Minutes of 18th Meeting’
The Director Office of the Civil Affairs Bureau of the Ministry of Justice, 2018, ‘会社法制(企業統治等関係)の見直しに関する中間試案の補足説明 (Tr.: Supplementary Explanation on the Intermediate Draft for reviewing the Corporate Law (Corporate Governance and other related)’
The Third-Party Investigative Committee, 2011, ‘調査報告書 (Tr.: The Investigative Report (full version))’
The Working Committee on Corporate Law (Corporate Governance and others related) under the Legislative Council of the Ministry of Justice, 2017, ‘社外取締役を置くことの義務付け等に関する論点の検討 (Tr.: The Consideration of Issues on Obligating appointment Outside Director and Others)’
The Working Committee on the Corporate Governance under the Legislative Council of the Ministry of Justice, 2019, ‘会社法制(企業統治等関係)の見直しに関する要綱案 (Tr.: The Draft Proposal on Corporate Law (Corporate Governance and Other Related))’
Journals:
Aronson, Bruce E, 2003, ‘Reconsidering the Importance of Law in Japanese from the Daiwa
Bank Shareholder Derivative Case’, Cornell International Law Journal, Volume 36
Internet:
The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (“METI”) formulated the Practical Guidelines for Corporate Governance Systems (“CGS Guidelines”), https://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2017/pdf/0331_005b.pdf
Tokyo Stock Exchange (2018), “東証上場会社における社外取締役の選任状況及び「社外取締役を置くことが相当でない理由」の傾向について (Tr.: Outside Director Appointments in Listed Companies at TSE and Trend for Unsuitabiltiy to Appoint an Outside Director)”, http://www.moj.go.jp/content/001266173.pdf
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.