GOVERNMENT-OWNED ENTERPRISES (GOEs) IN INDONESIA’S COMPETITION LAW AND PRACTICE
Abstract
In the competition law discourse, one of the controversial issues is the position of Government-Owned Enterprises (GOEs). There are basically two main views regarding the status of GOEs in the competition law. First, GOEs should be granted privileges, even excluded from the scope of business competition law. Secondly, since GOEs are basically businesses and competitors to private enterprises, GOEs must also be subject to competition law. This paper discusses the status of GOEs in Indonesia’s competition law, both in the context of normative framework and in the implementation of competition law provisions. For this purpose, this paper examine the rules of competition law governing the GOEs and analyze some cases of alleged violations of competition law examined by the KPPU as the Indonesian competition authority. This study found that basically Indonesia’s competition law follows the so-called “competitive neutrality” principle in which the law treat both GOEs and private enterprises in equal manner. However, at the practical domain, the cases studied indicates that monopolistic or dominant position held by GOEs may be abused to favor subsidiaries which are in direct, head to head competition, with private enterprises.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
References
Books
MacAvoy, Paul W., et al., 1989, Privatization and State-Owned Enterprises, Boston, Kluwer.
Siswanto, Arie, 2002, Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Bogor, PT Ghalia Indonesia.
Toninelli, Pier Angelo, 2000, The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Vernon, Raymond & Aharoni, Yair, 1981, State-Owned Enterprise in the Western Economies, New York, NY, Routledge.
Wish, Richard & Bailey, David, 2012, Competiton Law. Oxford, United Kingdom, Oxford University Press.
Zimmer, Daniel, ed., 2012, The Goals of Competition Law. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Journals
Chow, Daniel C. K., 2016, “How China Promotes Its State-Owned Enterprises at the Expense of Multinational Companies in China and Other Countries”, North Carolina Journal of International Law, 41(3), 455-490.
Kim, Minwoo, 2017, “Regulating the Visible Hands: Development of Rules on State-Owned Enterprises in Trade Agreements”, Harvard International Law Journal, 58(1), 225-272.
Kovacic, William E., 2017, “Competition Policy and State-Owned Enterprises in China”. World Trade Review, 16(4), 693-711.
Sappington, David E.M. & Sidak, Gregory J., 2003, “Competition Law for State-Owned Enterprises”. Antitrust Law Journal, 71(2), 479-253.
Wylemins, Ines, 2016, “Disciplines on State-Owned Enterprises in International Economic Law: Are We Moving in the Right Direction?”, Journal of International Economic Law, 9, 657-680.
Papers & Articles
Aproskie, Jason, Hendriksz, Morné and Kolobe, Tshekishi, 2014, State-owned enterprises and competition: exception to the rule?.s.l.
Fox, E. M. and Healey, D., 2013, When the State harms competition – The role for competition law. New York University Law and Economics Working Papers, Paper 336.
Healey, Deborah, 2011, “Application of Competition Laws to Government in Asia: The Singapore Story”, ASLI Working Paper, No. 025.
OECD, State Owned Enterprises and the Principle of Competitive Neutrality, Policy Roundtables, 2009.
Authorities
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 19 of 2003 concerning State-Owned Enterprises
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 23 of 2014 concerning Local Governments.
Cases
Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943)
Case Number 10 / KPPU-L / 2001
Case Number 08 / KPPU-I / 2005
Case Number 04 / KPPU-L / 2012
Case Number 8/KPPU-L/2016
Web resources
http://www.bumn.go.id/berita/0-Statistik-Jumlah-BUMN
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.