I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja


Under the WTO, Indonesia is obliged to liberalize its markets through establishing the schedule that comprise a list of services that can be either opened or closed to foreign suppliers.  However, Indonesia’s schedule is vague as to whether gambling services are closed to foreign suppliers. Through this loophole, the practice of cross-border gambling services has been rampant, resulting in some consequences, especially those related to money laundering and underage gambling. Tackling this problem, Indonesia could apply public morals exception that allows member states to impose trade prohibition. By using public morals exception that was applied in some WTO cases, this article explores the way in which Indonesia could justify prohibiting cross-border gambling services. This article claims that Indonesia has a justification to impose public morals exception under the WTO to prohibit cross-border gambling services within its territory because the prohibition would be designed to protect public morals; it would be necessary to protect public morals; and the prohibition would equally apply  to both foreign and local suppliers in cross-border gambling services in Indonesia.

Full Text:



Guzman, Andrew T. and Pauwelyn Joost, International Trade Law, 2012, Wolters Kluwer, South Holland

Van den Bossche, Peter, the Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization, 2010, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.


Andrle, John D., “A Winning Hand: A Proposal for an International Regulatory Schema With Respect to the Growing Online Gambling Dilemma in the United States”, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 375 VAND. J. OF TRANSNAT’L L. 1389 (2004).

Andina, Elga, “Studi Dampak Negatif Facebook Terhadap Remaja Indonesia [A Study of Negative Impact of Facebook for Indonesian Teenagers]” 1(1) Aspirasi Jurnal 124 (2010).

Charnovitz, Steve, “The Moral Exception in Trade Policy”, Virginia Journal of International Law 38:4 VA J INT’L L 689 (1998)

Gonzalez, Miguel A., “Note, Trade and Morality: Preserving Public Morals Without Sacrificing the Global Economy”, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 39 VAND. J. TRANSNAT’L L 939 (2006).

LaPlante D.A, et al, “Sitting at the Virtual Poker Table: A Prospective Epidemiological Study of Actual Internet Poker Gambling Behavior”, 25 Computers in Human Behavior 729 (2009).

Weinberg, Joel, “Everyone’s A Winner: Regulating, Not Prohibiting, Internet Gambling”, Southwestern University Law Review 35 SW. U.L.REV. 293 (2006).

Wu, Mark, “Free Trade and the Protection of Public Morals: An Analysis of the Newly Emerging Public Morals Clause Doctrine”, Yale Journal of International Law 33 YALE J. INT’L L. 215 (2008).


  • There are currently no refbacks.