THE CIRCUMSTANCE THAT NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED BY JUDGES OF INDUSTRIAL RELATION COURT IN DECIDING REINSTATE DECISION

Budi Santoso

Abstract

The implementation of the Industrial Relations Court verdict in the case of termination disputes which order employers to reinstate workers faces obstacles occasionally. This is caused by the reluctance of employers to comply with the verdict. This article aims to analyze the considered situations that the Industrial Relations Court needs to take into account in declaring a reinstatement decision in the case of termination disputes. Through the use of normative legal research methods with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, it is concluded that such considerations include: the reinstatement of worker to his/her former job title is not appropriate if the position left by the worker has been filled by another worker; the reinstatement of worker is not appropriately provided if it may cause an unharmonious relationship between employers and workers; the reinstatement of worker is not appropriately provided if it causes prejudice to the worker; the reinstatement of worker is unsuitable if it will have a negative impact on the relationship between the worker and the other workers in the workplace; and/or the reinstatement of worker would be unsuitable if the worker has a confidentiality capacity for the company's secrets because the employer no longer trusts the worker.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adrian Sutedi, Hukum Perburuhan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2009.

Bob Hepple, The Making of Labour Law in Europe: a comparative study of nine countries up to 1945, Mansel Publishing Limited, London and New York, 1986.

Budi Santoso dan Ratih Dheviana, ‘Eksistensi Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak dalam Perjanjian Kerja’ (2012) 6 (3) Arena Hukum 201 – 209.

Edi Sutrisno Sidabutar, Pedoman Penyelesaian PHK, Praninta Offset, Jakarta, 2007.

Giuseppe Casale, The Employment Relationship: A Comparative Overview, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2011.

Hukumonline, Putusan Mahkamah Agung Membuat Karyawan Pertamina Bingung, http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/hol18689/putusan-mahkamah-agung-membuat-karyawan-pertamina-bingung (diakses pada tanggal 1 Maret 2016).

ILO Declaration Concerning the Aims and Purposes of the International Labour Organisation 1944.

Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt et. al., Labor and Employment Law and Economics, Edward Elgar publishing, Cheltenham, 2009.

Lalu Husni, Pengantar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia, ed. Revisi, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2008.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 13 PK/PHI/2007.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 051 PK/Pdt.Sus/2009.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 701 K/Pdt.Sus/2009.

Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial pada Pengadilan Negeri Semarang No.33/G/2009/PHI.SMG.

Richard N. Block et al., The Economic Dimension of the Employment Relationship, dalam Jacqueline A. et. al. (Editors), The Employment Relationship: Examining Psychological and Contextual Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.

Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v7i3.19246

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.