THE IMPLICATIONS OF EXPANDING THE AUTHORITY OF THE PRETRIAL POST-VERDICT JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN DECIDING WHETHER IT IS A VALID DETERMINATION OF THE SUSPECT AGAINST LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE SUSPECT

Seno Wibowo Gumbira, Ratna Nurhayati

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are implications of expanding the authority of the pretrial post-verdict judicial review of Constitutional Court in deciding whether it is a valid determination of the suspect against law enforcement and the protection of the rights of the suspect. This research belongs to normative research. The results of this study explain that the interpretation method used in pretrial decision  No:04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jak.Sel is the method of discovery of analogy interpretation law (argumentum per analogiam) is wrong, while the legal interpretation method used in the judicial review judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 is the historical interpretation method (historiche intepretatie) the problem namely, the Constitutional Court has exceeded its original function that is negative legislator became positive legislators form or add a new norm. So that raises the problem that is contrary to the principles of the criminal justice system that is the principle of quick and simple and low budget justice and the principle of litis finiri oportet also inhibits the process of law enforcement settlement.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Books:

Abintoro Prakoso, 2016, Penemuan Hukum, Sistem, Metode, Aliran Dan Prosedur Dalam Menemukan Hukum (Rechtsvinding, System, Methods, Sect, and Procedur in The Finding of Law), Laksabang: Yogyakarta.

Achmad Ali, 2015, Menguak Tabir Hukum ,Edisi Kedua (Uncovering The Veil of Law, Second Edition ), Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Grup.

Indriyanto Seno Adji, 2015, Praperadilan & KUHAP,catatan mendatang (Pre-Trial and KUHAP, Future Notes) , Diadit Media: Jakarta..

MoeljatNumber, 1987, Asas Asas Hukum Pidana (Criminal Law Priciples), Bina Aksara: Jakarta.

Munir Fuady, 2006, Teori Hukum Pembuktian (Theory on Law of Evidence), Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung.

Nyoman Sarikat Putra Jaya, 2008, Beberapa Pemikiran Ke Arah Pengembangan Hukum PIdana (Some Thoughts Towards The Development of Criminal Law), Citra Adiya Bakti: Bandung.

Sidharta, 2016, Heurestika dan Hermeneutika: Penalaran Hukum Pidana. Artikel pada Demi Keadilan Antologi HUkum Pidana dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Heurestics and Hermeneutics: Criminal Law Reasoning. Articles on “For” the Justice of Criminal Law and The Criminal Justice System): 6 Dasawarsa Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, Pustaka Kemang: Jakarta.

Sri Soemantri, 1990, Bunga Rampai Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia (Potpourri of The Constitutional Law), Alumni: Bandung.

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2002, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (Indonesia Privat Procedur Law), Liberty: Yogyakarta.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamuji, 2007, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat (Normative Legal Research, a Simple Review), Rajawali Press: Jakarta.

Yudha Bhakti Ardhiwisastra, 2000, Penafsiran dan Konstruksi Hukum (Interpretation and Legal Construction), Alumni: Bandung.

Journals

Janpatar Simamora. “Analisa Yuridis Terhadap Model Kewenangan Yudicial Review di Indonesia”. Yogyakarta Jurnal Mimbar Hukum FH UGM Vol 25 No 3 Oktober 2013.

Yustisia Vol. 7 No. 1 January – April 2018 The Implications Of Expanding… 161

Martitah. “Progresivitas Hakim Konstitusi Dalam Membuat Putusan (Analisis Terhadap Keberadaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang bersifat Positive Legislature)”. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 41 No2, April 2012. FH UNDIP. Semarang.

Muchamad Ali Safa’at, “Kekuatan Mengikat Dan Pelaksanaan Putusan MK”, Makalah, Malang Universitas Brawijaya

Seno Wibowo Gumbira. “Problematika Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pasca SEMA RI Number 7 Tahun 2014 (Suatu Analisa Yuridis Dan Asas-Asas Dalam Hukum Peradilan Pidana)”. Depok. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Vol 46 No 1 Tahun 2016 FH UI

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.