ANALYSIS OF NOTARY HONORARY COUNCIL CONSENT AS GROUNDS OF IMPUNITY (STRAFUITSLAUTINGSGRONDEN) AGAINST REVELATION OF SECRETS

Gaza Carumna Iskadrenda, Anggita Mustika Dewi

Abstract

Article 66 paragraph (1) Act Number 2 of 2014 essentially regulates the consent of the Notary Honorary Council in the criminal justice process. The provisions in the a quo article have been still being applied and become a positive law in Indonesia. One of the criminal justice process in the notarial field relates to the criminal act of revelation of secrets as regulated in Article number 322 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. The consent given by the Notary Honorary Council as outlined above can certainly be viewed in the context of criminal law.

The research is a normative legal research using secondary data of both primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data collecting technique used is documentary study with written materials as the data collection tool to be analyzed qualitatively using content analysis.

The research result showed that in the context of criminal law, basically a notary who provides a copy of the deed and/or documents attached to the minuta deed or notarial protocol in the notarial archives for the purpose of the investigator, the public prosecutor or the judge has committed a criminal act of revelation of secrets as stipulated in Article number 322 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. However, the notary is not necessarily criminally liable considering the consent of the Notary Honorary Council as the grounds of impunity.


Keywords: Notary Honorary Council consent, grounds of impunity, criminal act of revelation of secrets.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Act Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Public Official (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2004 Number 117, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4432).

Act Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Act Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Public Official (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2014 Number 3, Supplement to State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5491).

Regulation of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights Number 7 of 2016 concerning the Notary Honorary Council (Official Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 180 Year 2016).

Constitutional Court Decision Number 49/PUU-X/2012.

Constitutional Court Decission Number 72/PUU-XI/2014.

Adjie, Habib, 2008, Hukum Notaris Indonesia (Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris), PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.

___________, 2013, Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, Cetakan Ketiga, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Hamdan, M., 2014, Alasan Penghapus Pidana Teori dan Studi Kasus, Cetakan Kedua, Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Hamzah, Andi, 2017, Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

H.S., Salim, 2016, Teknik Pembuatan Akta Satu (Konsep Teoretis, Kewenangan Notaris, Bentuk dan Minuta Akta), Edisi Pertama, Cetakan Kedua, Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Moeljatno, 2011, KUHP Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Kedua Puluh Sembilan, PT Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Mulyoto, 2010, Kriminalisasi Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perseroan Terbatas (PT), Edisi Revisi, Cakrawala Media, Yogyakarta.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S., 2016, Prinsip-prinsip Hukum Pidana, Edisi Revisi, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta.

Poernomo, Bambang, 1981, Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Cetakan Keempat, Ghalia Indonesia, Yogyakarta.

Remmelink, J., 2014, Pengantar Hukum Pidana Material 1 Inleiding tot de Studie van het Nederlandse Strafrecht, diterjemahkan oleh Tristam P. Moeliono, Maharsa Publishing, Yogyakarta.

Soekanto, Soerjono, 1986, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Cetakan Ketiga, UI-Press, Jakarta.

Subekti, R., R. Tjitrosudibio, 2014, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek), Cetakan Keempat Puluh Satu, PT Balai Pustaka (Persero), Jakarta.

Sudarto, 1990, Hukum Pidana I, Cetakan Kedua, Yayasan Sudarto, Semarang.

Sumardjono, Maria S.W., 2014, Bahan Kuliah Metodologi Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v6i3.17012

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.