Bambang Santoso, Soehartono .Soehartono, Muhammad Rustamaji


Thus far, equality before the law is understood as an ideality without limitation and exception. Its enforceability is considered to apply indiscriminately for every law breaker. However, reality of law enforcement says differently when a perpetrator of the crime is called an early age child. Special regulations exist injustice system, law governing it as well as provisions derived from the children rights, although the child is positioned as dealing with the law. In such context of an establishment of law regarding children in conflict with the law, it is interesting to find philosophical roots of distinctive treatment negating equality before the law. The explorative step is more attractive, especially when many mosaics of conception has been discovered about what are the truths whena child is in conflict with the law: 1) violations committed by children are not purely mistakes of the children, 2) children are, nevertheless, having rights that must be fulfilled including when dealing with the law, 3) children has privileges with broad distribution of regulations in various sectors and according to the view based on Pancasila, they are keten (a link) of a nation. Such varied conceptions elicit necessity of unearthing philosophical roots, truths and realitiesthat are always plural. So that, the law established is not only be legal because it is formed in legitimate manner and by legitimate power (pedigree thesis), also incorporating theexisting basic values or moral principles, though not absolute, depending on condition of society (the moral thesis) (Twining, 2009). Thus, study of such legal products is not only be seen as the work of professional, but as Satjipto Rahardjo viewed, it is placed as an scientific object to explain that a law codified in legislation, though, is not something sacred to examine for its philosophical content.


Children in conflict with the law, philosophy of Pancasila, different treatment.

Full Text:



Latif, Yudi. (2012). Negara Paripurna (Historisitas, Rasionalitas, dan Aktualitas Pancasila). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2012.

Ministry of Women Empowerment and Child Protection of Indonesia. (2016). General Explanation of Indonesian Government Regulation No. 65 Year 2015 on Guideline on Implementation of Diversion and Treatment for Children of less than 12 (twelve) years old. Jakarta: Deputy for Child Protection Agency.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2000). “Mengajarkan Keteraturan Menemukan Ketidakteraturan (Teaching Order Finding Disorder)” (An article was delivered in the speech at the end of tenure as a full-time professor at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang: Publishing Agency of Universitas Diponegoro

Rahayu. (2013). Hukum Hak asasi manusia di Era Global: Tantangan Implementasinya di Indonesia, An Inauguration Speech at Reception of Position as Professor of international law of the Law Faculty, Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang: Publishing Agency of Universitas Diponegoro.

Rustamaji, Muhammad. (2015). 'Mempertimbangkan Filsafat Kritis dan Deep Ecology dalam Pergumulan Masayarakat Ekonomi ASEAN’, a paper in the Proceedings of the National Seminar, Editor: Aidul Fitriciada Azhari, Kesiapan Indonesia: Harmonisasi Hukum Negara-negara ASEAN Menuju Komunitas ASEAN 2015. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Smith, Rhona K.M. et.al. (2008). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. Yogyakarta: PUSHAM UII.

Soekarno. (2014). Pancasila Dasar Negara: Kursus Pancasila Oleh Presiden Soekarno. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Pancasila UGM.

Susanto, Anthon F. (2010). Ilmu Hukum Nonsistematik (Fondasi Filsafat Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia). Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Syamsudin. M. (2012). Konstruksi Baru Budaya Hukum Hakim Berbasis Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana.

Twining, William. (2009). General Jurisprudence, Understanding Law from Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945


  • There are currently no refbacks.