Characterization of Humic Substance Extracted from Andisols, Spodosols, Peat, and Lignite

Eka Rahmi, Suwardi Suwardi, Basuki Sumawinata


Soil and other materials with high C-organic content are potential natural sources of humic substances. Until now the differences in the characteristics of such humic substances that are extracted from different sources have not been widely studied. Thus, this study was aimed to characterize humic substances extracted from andisols, spodosols, peat, and lignite. The highest C-organic (48.8%) and N (7.6%) were obtained from peat and spodosols, respectively. The andisols humic substance produced the highest total acidity (6.52 cmol kg-1). Humic substance extracted from spodosols was a mostly aliphatic group and phenolate –OH, while that of andisols and lignite contained more aromatic group and phenolate –OH, whereas the humic substance from peat was a predominantly aliphatic group and –COOH. The surface morphology of the humic substances observed using SEM showed varying densities and shapes due to differences in their respective degree of decomposition and the formation process involved. There has been significant interest in investigating the different characteristics of the humic substance. The type humic substances are important to be known considering of their positive effects on soil fertility and plant growth and development.


functional group; humic substance; surface morphology; total acidity

Full Text:



Adiwiganda, R., Koendadiri, A., & Poeloengan, Z. (1993). Characteristics of spodosols at Minas geological formation. Oil Palm Research Center Bulletin, 163–173.

Alimin, N., Santosa, S., & Noegrohati, S. (2005). Fractionation of humic acid and its influence on the solubility of zinc and cadmium ions. Journal of Basic Science, 6, 1–6.

Biyantoro, D., Subagiono, R., & Sumarsono, M. (2006). Character of humic compound extracted from peat and andisols using methyl-isobutyl ketones. In Proceedings (PPI-PDIPTN) Center for Technology and Substance Process Accelerator–National Nuclear Energy Agency (BATAN) (pp. 195–204). Yogyakarta.

Buurman, P., & Jongmans, A. G. (2002). PODZOLIZATION – AN ADDITIONAL PARADIGM. EDAFOLOGIA, 9(2), 107–114.

Chen, Y., Senesi, N., & Schnitzer, M. (1978). Chemical and physical characteristics of humic and fulvic acids extracted from soils of the Mediterranean region. Geoderma, 20(2), 87–104.

Francioso, O., Ciavatta, C., Montecchio, D., Tugnoli, V., Sánchez-Cortés, S., & Gessa, C. (2003). Quantitative estimation of peat, brown coal and lignite humic acids using chemical parameters, 1H-NMR and DTA analyses. Bioresource Technology, 88(3), 189–195.

Lawson, G., & Steward, D. (1989). Coal humic acids. New York, USA: Wiley-Interscience.

Muzakky, Taftazani, A., & Sukirno. (2013). Optimasi ekstraksi asam humat dari na-humat dan karakterisasinya dengan FTIR. GANENDRA, VI(2), 15–20.

Noorhidayah, R. (2015). Chemical characteristics and infrared spectral of humic acid and fulvic acid from seven orders in Central Java and special region of Yogyakarta. Journal of Basic Science, 6, 1–6.

Rahmawati, S. (2003). Characterization of humic acid from peat compost and rubber leaf compost (Research Paper). Bogor.

Ricca, G., Federico, L., Astori, C., & Gallo, R. (1993). Structural investigations of humic acid from leonardite by spectroscopic methods and thermal analysis. Geoderma, 57(3), 263–274.

Soil Survey Staff. (2000). Keys to Soil Taxonomy.

Stevenson, F. (1982). Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. New York, USA: A Willey & Sons, Inc.

Suharta, N., & Yatno, E. (2009). Karakteristik spodosols, kendala dan potensi penggunaannya. Jurnal Sumberdaya Lahan, 3(1), 1–14.

Tan, K. (1998). Principles of Soil Chemistry. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Tan, K. (2011). Principle of Soil Chemistry. New York, USA: CRC Press.

Zhou, S., Xu, J., Yang, G., & Zhuang, L. (2014). Methanogenesis affected by the co-occurrence of iron(III) oxides and humic substances. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 88(1), 107–120.


  • There are currently no refbacks.