METACOGNITIVE LEARNING STRATEGY: IN SEARCH OF THEORETICAL MODEL FOR READING COMPREHENSION

Iswan Riyadi; Hersulastuti Hersulastuti; Theresia Kriswianti Nugrahaningsih

doi:10.20961/seeds.v1i1.19894

METACOGNITIVE LEARNING STRATEGY: IN SEARCH OF THEORETICAL MODEL FOR READING COMPREHENSION

Iswan Riyadi, Hersulastuti Hersulastuti, Theresia Kriswianti Nugrahaningsih

Abstract

This paper was presented on the basic of senior high school teachers’ complaint over the implementation of scientific- based approach in 2013 Indonesian National Curriculum. Their path to successful learning is obstructed by the discontinuity of five stages of scientific- based approach which comprises of observing, questioning, associating, experimenting, and networking. This study was aimed at developing a theoretical model of reading comprehension based on metacognitive learning strategies. Descriptive qualitative approach was carried out to determine some possible theories which might lead to coin the theoretical model of reading comprehension based on metacognitive learning strategies for Indonesian students of Senior High School. Results of the study showed that underlining, note taking, summarizing, concept mapping might also be instantly working together to help senior high school students get the text content well-comprehended.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aleese Ray Mc. (1998). The Knowledge Arena as an Extension to the Concept Map: Reflection in Action, Interactive Learning Environment. 6(10), 1–2

Alwan-Al, (2008). The Effect of Using Metacognition Reading Strategies on the Reading Comprehension of Arabic Texts. IJAES. 13(1), 1-17.

Boch, F. (2001). Note-taking as writing to learn at University. Pratiques, 105/106, 137-159

Bohay, M., Blakely, D.P., Tamplin, A.K., & Radvansky, G.A. (2011). Note-taking. Review, memory, and comprehension. The American Journal of Psychology, 124, 63-73.

Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Brown, A.L., & Day, J.D. (1983). Macrorules for summarizing text: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 1-14

Cassata E. Amy, Lucia French. (2006). Using Concept Mapping To Facilitate Metacognitive Control In Preschool Children. Paper presented at The Second International Conference on Concept Mapping. San José, Costa Rica,

Castro, & Carolyn, D. (2006). Improving L2 Reading and Summarizing Skills through Explicit Instruction in Text Structure. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3.59-78.

Chan , D.W., (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinesse good and poor readers in Hong Kong, Journal of Research in Reading 26(2) 177-190

Cho, Y. (2012). Teaching Summary Writing through Direct Instruction to Improve Text Comprehension for Students in ESL/EFL Classroom. A Master’s Paper. University of Wisconsin-River Falls.

Diliduzgun, Sukran, Genc, & Serife (2015). Improving summarizing skills through text structure-based strategies. International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBBS).

Dinsmor. D., Alexander. P., Loughlin, S.M. (2008). Focusing on the Conceptual Lens on Metacognition, Self Regulation, and Self Regulated Learning. Educational Psichological Review 20, 477-484.

Edmondson, K.M, (1994). Concept maps and the development of cases for problem based learning, Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 69(2), 108-110.

Elliott, J. (2007). Summarizing with drawings: a reading-comprehension strategy. Science Scope. 23-27.

Enrich, M.K., Grabe, K.. Koda,K., Mosenthal, P., Mulcahy- Ernt, P., & Schedl, M.A. (2000).

TOEFL 2000 Reading Framework: A working Paper. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Flavell, J, Wellman, H.M., (1977). Metamemory; Perspective on the development of memory and cognition, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.

Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

Fowler, R.L., Barkes, A.S. (1974). Effectiveness of Hightlighting for Retention of Text Material. Journal of Applied Psycghology, 59, 358-364.

Garner, Ruth (1990) When Children and Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Toward a Theory of Setting, Review of Educational Research 60(4), 517-529.

Georghiades, P. (2000). Beyond Conceptual Change Learning In Science Education: Focusing On Transfer, Durability And Metacognition. Educational Research, 42(2), 119-140. Hartley (2002).

Note-taking in non academic settings: a review. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 559-574.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning; A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta Analyses Relating to Achivement, Oxon, New York: Routledge,

Hebert, M,. Graham, S., Wills, H.R., & Ganson, K. (2014). Effects of Note-taking and Extended Writing on Expository Text Comprehension: Who benefits? A Contemporary Journal, 12 (1),43-68.

Hidi, S., & Anderson. V. (1986). Producing Written Sumaries: Task Demands, Cognitive Operations, and Implications for Instruction. Review of Educational Research 56 (4),473-493.

Kaplan, A. (2008). Clarifying Metacognition, Self Regulation, Self Regulated Learning : What’s the Purpose? Educational Psichological Review, 20, 477-484.

Kiewra, K.A. (1987). Note- taking and review: The research and its implication. Instructional Science, 16, 233-249.

Kim, S.E. (2001). Characteristic of EFL Readers’ Summary Writing: A Study with Korean University Students. Foreign Language Anals 34(6), 569-581.

Kirkland, M., & Saunders, S. (1991). Maximizing Students Performance in Summary Writing: Managing Cognitive Load. TESOL QUARTERLY, 25(1), 105-121.

Kuo EnChang, Yao Ting Sung, Ine Dai Chen, (2002). The Effect of Concept Mapping to Enhance Text Comprehension and Summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5-23.

Lee, P.L., Lan, W., Hamman, D., & Hendricks, B. (2008). The effect of teachng note-taking strategies on elementry students’ science learning. Instr Sci. 36,191-201.

Leutwyer, B. (2009). Metacognitive Learning Strategies: Differential Development Patterns in High School, Metacognitive Learning 4: 111-123.

Magogwe, J.M. (2013). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies of Universities of Botswana, Reading and writing, 4(1) 1-8.

Marxen, Dale. (1996). Why Reading and Undetlining a Passage Is a Less Effective Study Strategy Than Simply Reading the Passage, Reading Improvement, 33(2), 88-96.

Cabe, Mc. (2011). Metacognitive Awareness of Learning Strategies in Undergraduates, Mem.Cogn, 39, 462-476.

Mintzes J.J., Wandersee J.H., & Novak, J.D. (1997). Teaching science for understanding. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Mokhtari, K & Sheorey, R, (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Development Education 25, 2-10.

Nist,S.L. & Hogrebe (1987) The Role of Underlining and Annotating in Remembering Textual Information, Reading Research and instruction 27, 12-25.

Penagos, H.P (2011) How Can Metacognition be Developed through Problem-Solving in Higher Education, Ingeniera E Investigacion, 31, 213-223.

Pintrich, H.P.R, (2002). The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assesing, Theory Into Practice, 41, 219-225.

Price, Elizabeth (2012). Silent Reading Fluency Using Underlining: Evidence for An Alternative Method of Assement, Psychology in the School, 49(6) 606-618.

Robinson, D, H., Katayama, A.D., Odom, S., Beth, A., Hsieh, Y.P., & Vanderveen, A. (2006). Increasing text comprehension and graphic note-taking using a partial organizer task. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 103-111.

Riyadi, I., Hersulastuti, Kriswianti, Th. (2015). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Membaca Pemahaman Berbasis Strategi Belajar Metakognisi. Kemenristek Dikti: Laporan Hasil Penelitian Hibah Pascasarjana.

Romainville, M. & Noe, B (2003). Metacognition and Note-taking learning at the University. Arobase, 1-2, 87-96

Rosenthal (2000) Metacognition And Higher Order Thoughts, Conciousness and Cognition, 26, 231-242.

Singhal, M. (2001). Reading, proficiency, reading strategies, metacognitive awareness, and L2 learners, The Reading Matrix.

Schnell, Thomas (1978). A Comparison of Underlying Strategies for Improving Reading Comprehension and Retention, Reading Horizon, Vol. 18(2), 106-109.

Tajeddin, Zia, Tabatabaei, Soudabeh (2016). Concept Mapping as a Reading Strategy: Does It Scaffold Comprehensioon and Recall? Reading Matrix An International Online Journal, 16(1). 194-208.

Taginezhad (2015). The Influence of Teachuing Metacognitive Reading Strategies on the Reading Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Iranian EFL Learners, Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 4(5), 728-734.

Trawick-Smith, J. (2003). Early childhood development, a multicultural perspectives. Upper Saddle Rve, New Jersey: Merril Prentice Hall.

Veenman M.V.J & Bernadette (2006) Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning 1: 3–14.

Venus, L.B. (2015). The Effect of Metacognitive Learning Strategy in Physic Achievement, The International Journal of Science & Technolodge, 3, 9-21.

White, C.J. (1996). Note-taking and traces of cognition in language learning. RELC Journal. 27, 89-1032.

Yue, C.L. (2015). Highlighting and Its Relation to Distributed Study and Students’ Metacognitive Beliefs, Educational Psychology Review, 27, 69-78.

Zohar, A. & David (2009). Paving a clear path in a thick forest: a conceptual analysis of a metacognitive component. Metacognition Learning, 4: 177–195

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/seeds.v1i1.19894