RUANG MENTAL DAN MODEL KOGNITIF IDEAL PEJABAT PEMERINTAH PADA HUMOR SATIRE #LORDLUHUT

Nurul Azizah

Abstract

This research aims to (1) explain the relationship between the mental space of humor and #LordLuhut's satire; (2) describes the ideal concept of the idealized duties and authorities of government officials through the satire humor of #Lord Luhut. Citizen have the right to express their opinions and aspirations. There are many ways that can be done to convey the aspirations of a community to the government. One of them is by using social media to aspire their voice as a citizen. Criticism is conveyed through linguistic expressions on social media, one of which is manifested in satire humor. The data of this research is a form of humorous satire #LordLuhut which comes from various Twitter uploads. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively by using cognitive linguistic theories, such as mental space, profiling, prototypes and ideal cognitive models. The research results are presented with formal and informal methods. Several conclusions were obtained: (1) the existence of mental space in the expression of satire humor indicates that the expression is only imagination, not reality; (2) there is an ideal concept of a government official written by the author in the humorous satire #LordLuhut.

 

Keywords

satire humor, mental space, ideal cognitive model; twitter

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aprilia, P., & Arimi, S. (2019). Ruang mental dan model kognitif ideal Ketua DPR-RI pada humor satire #ThepowerofSetyaNovanto. Bastin, 1, 109–121.

Arimi, S. (2015). Linguistik kognitif sebuah pengantar. Yogyakarta: A.Com Press.

Danandjaja, J. (1989). Ensiklopedia Indonesia Jilid VI. Jakarta: Cipta Adi Pustaka.

Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.

Evans, V. (2007). A glossary of cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fouconnier, G. dan Mark, T. (2002). The way we think conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.

Keraf, G. (2010). Diksi dan gaya bahasa. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

George, L. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Marzuuqi, S. & M. Y. (2019). Twitter sebagai media propaganda (analisis wacana pada tweet @TsamaraDKI dan @FaldoMaldini sebagai media propaganda menjelang pemilihan Presiden 2019). Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7, 421–438.

Nirmala, D. (2014). Proses kognitif dalam ungkapan. Parole, 4, 1–13.

Nuessel, F. (2003). On the discourse of satire: Towards a stylistic model of satirical humor. Paul Simpson, 34, 74–78.

Priambodo, M. J. (2021). Frame dan model kognitif ideal dialog antara Bu Tejo dan Yu Ning dalam Film Tilik. Bastrindo, 2(1), 35–44.

Rahmawati, N., Muslichatun, & Marizal, M. (2021). Kebebasan berpendapat terhadap pemerintah melalui media sosial dalam perspektif UU ITE. Pranata Hukum, 3(1), 62-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v3i1.270

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Sutedi, D. (2008). Dasar-dasar linguistik bahasa Jepang. Bandung: Humaniora.

Wijana, I. D. P. (1994). Pemanfaatan homonimi di dalam humor. Humaniora, 1(1), 21-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.2025

Yohani, A. M. (2016). Kotozawa dalam Kajian Linguistik Kognitif: Penerapan Gaya Bahasa Sinekdok. Izumi, 5(1), 24–32.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/prasasti.v7i2.65643

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.