BAGAIMANA MUKA DIWUJUDKAN DALAM INTERAKSI KOMUNIKASI PADA PERTUNJUKAN WAYANG SUKURAGA

Ramdan Sukmawan

Abstract

This research aims at describing how face expresses in communication interaction in wayang sukuraga show. The show which presents the theme of human conflict internally, namely the conflicts part of body between figure and figure such as eyes, mouth, ears, nose, hand, and foot will have a certain offering of face whether positive face or negative face. Positive face expresses in: (1) regretting to what happen; (2) want to be liked; (3) confessing on profession; and (4) want to be known by other. Meanwhile negative face expresses in: (1) freedom to choose by his/herself; (2) freedom to see; (3) freedom to take; and (4) order to find out. The Research applied qualitative descriptive method with pragmatics approach. The data was obtained from video of wayang sukuraga show. Data collection applied simak method. The technique applied sadap and catat. Qualitative data analysis applied with the step of reduction data, display data, and drawing conclusion. 


Keywords

communication; face; interaction; pragmatics; Wayang Sukuraga

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Jahdali, N. A. (2021). Face in the Hijazi Idioms: What does it reveal? International Journal of Linguistics, 13(2), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v13i2.18578

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essay on face to face behavior. New York: Pantheon Book.

Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(1), 237–257.

Guan, X., & Lee, H. E. (2017). Fight and flight: A multilevel analysis of facework strategies in intercultural face-threatening acts. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 58(December 2016), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.04.008

Iis, N., Duswatun, D. A., & Amalia, A. R. (2017). Building character and literacy skills of primary school students through puppet contemplative Sukuraga. Vidyattama Sanatana International Journal of Hindu Science and Religious Studies, 1(1), 40–45.

Iis, N., Juliansyaha, A., & Lyesmaya, D. (2019). Local wisdom (Sukuraga Puppets) android application as a media literacy learning. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Local Wisdom, 150–154. Padang: EAI Research Meet Innovation. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.29-8-2019.2289143

Iis, N., Lyesmaya, D., & Sumiarsa, D. (2019). Pengaruh Wayang Sukuraga Terhadap literasi siswa kelas tinggi SD Kota Sukabumi. Holistika: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD, 3(2), 105–110.

Kamsali, I. (2017). The positive politeness in conversations performed by the students of english study program of Timor University. METATHESIS Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 1(2), 68–81. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v1i2.467

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.

Lestary, A. (2017). Positive and negative face on Alvin Adam’s Utterances on just Alvin Talk Show. Stilistika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 2(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33654/sti.v2i2.390

Miles, M., & Huberman, M. A. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif (Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi, ed.). Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., Birnholtz, J., & Hancock, J. T. (2017). Your post is embarrassing me: Face threats, identity, and the audience on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 92–99. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.030

Rahmansyah, S., Nur, T., Indrayani, L. M., & Martha, D. C. V. (2020). The Function of positive face threatening acts badly on-record without redressive action in household and cyberconflicts: A pragmatic study. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 19(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2020.19.2.9

Ruziyeva, N. (2020). Face concept in the category of politeness. European Journal of Humanities and Education Advancements, 1(4), 15–20.

Saiko Rudi, K. (2018). Tindakan Pengancaman dan penyelamatan wajah Anies Baswedan dan Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama. Jurnal KATA: Penelitian tentang Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 2(2), 356–370. https://doi.org/10.22216/jk.v2i2.3377

Sudaryanto. (1992). Metode linguistik ke arah memahami metode linguistik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa, pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistik. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

Suganda, D. (2007). Pemanfaatan konsep “ Muka ” (Face) dalam wacana wayang Golek : Analisis pragmatik. Humaniora, 19(3), 248–260.

Sukmawan, R. (2016). Penolakan mengancam muka. Proseding Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya 14, 311–314. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Bahasa dan Budaya Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.

Sukmawan, R. (2017). Refusal politeness strategy in wayang Golek. International Journal of Linguistics, 9(6), 19–27. https://doi.org/doi:10.5296/ijl.v9i6.12207

Sukmawan, R., & Hestiana, S. (2015). Face Threatening acts in wayang Golek. International Journal of Linguistics, 7(5), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v7i5.8330

Yassi, A. H. (2017). Ancangan model kerangka teori kesantunan yang efektif mengkaji budaya bahasa-bahasa warisan di Asia: Review terhadap keuniversalan kerangka teori kesantunan Brown & Levinson. Linguistik Indonesia, 35(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v35i2.68

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. London: Oxford University Press.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.